Case law

Huckins Hotel Co. v. Clampitt

101 Okla. 190 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1924

cause, by a public enemy, by the negligence of the owner, or by the act of someone whom he brought into the inn or boarding house; and upon such property the innkeeper or keeper of a boarding house has a lien and a right … Dickinson v. Winchester, 58 Mass. 114 ; Sasseen v. Clark, 37 Ga. 632 ; Coskery v. Nagle (Ga.) 10 S. E. 491 ; Williams V. Moore, 69 Ill. App. 618 : Giles v. Fauntleroy, 13 Md. 126 ; Maxwell v. Gerard, N. Y.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1992

THE TEST TO DETERMINE WHETHER A PERSON IS A PUBLIC OFFICER WAS ARTICULATED IN OKLAHOMA CITY V. CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, 62 P.2D 94 (OKLA. 1936). … THIS IS THE ONLY DUAL OFFICE EXEMPTION GIVEN TO SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS.

McMasters v. Town of Byars

203 Okla. 498 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1950

of any town, board of education, township board, school district board or any member or members of the aforesaid commissioners, or of any of the above named boards, to make any contract for, incur, acknowledge, approve, … In Coppedge et al. v.

Opinion No. 74-257 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1975

Rather, it vests discretion in the board of education with respect to such use which is to be exercised in accordance with regulations and conditions prescribed by the board. The United States Supreme Court in Ellis v. … In Cannon v.

CRB v. State

638 P.2d 1130 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1982

Cooper v. State, 584 P.2d 234 (Okl.Cr. 1978). II. … Brown v. State, 518 P.2d 898 (Okl.Cr. 1974).

Hobbs v. State

417 P.2d 934 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 31, 1966

See Hurst v. Pitman, 90 Okl.Cr. 329 , 213 P.2d 877 ; Bonsor v. District Court of Cimarron County, Okl.Cr., 303 P.2d 471 ; White v. Brown, Okl.Cr., 349 P.2d 509 ; Auten v. … In the case of Head v. State, Okl.Cr., 388 P.2d 327 ; and in the recent decision of Angel v.

Harvey v. State

676 P.2d 865 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1984

The residence is composed of white colored wood with brown wood trim. The roof of the residence is light in color. The front of the residence faces East. … McCormick v. State, 388 P.2d 873 (Okl.Cr.1964).

Town of Sentinel v. Riley

171 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1935

Galt v. Galloway, 4 Pet. 332 . It is hardly necessary to refer to judicial decisions illustrating the rule. They are numerous. A few may be mentioned. De Armond v. Neasmith, 32 Mich. 231 ; Gurney v. … Wallace, 98 Okla. 155 , 224 P. 515 ; Jueschke v. Seeley, 98 Okla. 133 , 224 P. 341 ; Selby Oil, etc., Co. v. Rogers, 94 Okla. 269 , 221 P. 1012 ; Walters v.

Thompson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

194 Okla. 77 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1944

In Anderson-Kerr v. … In Cash v.

Cannon v. Cassidy

542 P.2d 514 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1975

Coal, Oil and Gas Co. v. Styron, Okl., 303 P.2d 965 (1956). … See, Robertson v. Maney, 196 Okl. 500 , 166 P.2d 106 (1946), and, Ionic Petroleum Limited v. Third Finance Corp., Okl., 411 P.2d 492 (1966).

Jones v. Winters

365 P.2d 357 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1961

State Board of Equalization et al., 109 Mont. 52 , 96 P.2d 420, 422 , “This court has the power to declare a legislative Act invalid * * * ” In Jones v. … V, § 58).

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 2001

Opin. 71-366, at 391 (citing AFSCME v. Woodward, 406 Fed. 2d 137 (8th Cir. 1969)). … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964). ¶ 10 In International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 976 v.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1991

TERRY V. EDGIN, 598 P.2D 228 (OKLA. 1979). … STATE V. SUPERIOR COURT, WASH., 346 P.2D 999 (1959)."

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1972

WHEN INDIVIDUAL BOARD MEMBERS ARE NAMED AS DEFENDANTS IN CIVIL ACTION, PUBLIC EXPENDITURES FOR PAYMENT OF THE COSTS OF THEIR DEFENSE ARE PROPER WHEN THE BOARD MEMBERS ARE NAMED ONLY IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND WHEN NO … CITE: 70 O.S. 1972 Supp., 5-117 [ 70-5-117 ]; ARTICLE V, SECTION 11, ARTICLE V, SECTION 15, ARTICLE V, SECTION 19 (LARRY PAIN) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 96-043 (1996) **

In Re General Motors Corp." Piston Slap" Prods. Liability Litigation

385 F. Supp. 2d 1181 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 8, 2005

Lee v. … Brown was substituted as the named plaintiff for John Remor on January 20, 2005. 2 .

Wiley v. New Home Sewing MacH. Co.

128 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 3, 1928

See Gilmore v. Smith, 93 Okla. 4 , 219 Pac. 92 ; Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 ; Hall v. Bank of Commerce, 80 Okla. 40 , 193 Pac. 990 ; McDonell v. … Continental Supply Co., 79 Okla. 286 , 193 Pac. 524 ; Wagnon v. Davison, 79 Okla. 209 , 192 Pac. 565 .

State ex rel. Haning v. Dept. of Public Welfare

206 Okla. 583 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1952

See Board of Education of City of Guthrie, Logan County, v. Excise Board of Logan County, 86 Okla. 24 , 206 P. 517 ; Webster v. Morris, Co. Treas., 129 Okla. 145 , 264 P. 190 ; State ex rel. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. … Boyett et al., 183 Okla. 49 , 80 P. 2d 201 ; Excise Board of Tulsa County v. City of Tulsa, 180 Okla. 248 , 68 P. 2d 823 , and Excise Board of Tulsa County v. Board of Education City of Tulsa, School Dist.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Rymer

187 P.3d 725 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 2008

The Colorado Supreme Court's order affirmed the Hearing Board's order of disbarment. … Bar Ass'n v. Henderson, 1999 OK 29, ¶ 4 , 977 P.2d 1096, 1098 .

Dunagan v. State

755 P.2d 102 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1988

Two men, in ski masks, were present at the scene, along with a brown, four-door Ford sedan. … See Driskell v. State, 659 P.2d 343 (Okl.Cr.1983); Blades v. State, 619 P.2d 875 (Okl.Cr.1980).

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1986

Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries Auth ., 498 P.2d 1395 , 1398 (Okla. 1972). … Board whereby the County Board has assumed responsibility for the city or town's waste, and (3) the agreement authorizes the County Board to exercise such authority.