Case law

State v. Wilputte Coke Oven Corporation

251 Ala. 271 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 14, 1948

See, the King-Boozer case (State of Alabama v. King & Boozer), 314 U.S. 1 , 62 S.Ct. 43 , 86 L.Ed. 3 . … BROWN, LIVINGSTON, SIMPSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Harris

630 So. 2d 1018 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 7, 1994

Cowley & Bros., Inc. v. Brown, 569 So.2d 375 (Ala.1990); Alpine Bay Resorts, Inc. v. Wyatt, 539 So.2d 160 (Ala.1988). … Cowley & Bros, Inc. v. Brown, supra ; § 12-21-12(a), (c), Ala.Code 1975.

Woolen v. State

154 So. 3d 264 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Dec 20, 2013

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50-51 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). … State, 555 So.2d 290, 293 (Ala.Crim.App. 1989) (citing Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. at 51 ).

Toney v. Dewey

201 Ala. 533 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 11, 1918

Brown v. South Boston Savings Bank, 148 Mass. 300 , 19 N. … In Brown v. South Boston Savings Bank, supra, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held the case of Estabrook v. Smith, 6 Gray (Mass.) 570 , 66 Am.

Arnold v. Arnold

246 Ala. 86 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1944

BROWN, Justice (after stating the facts as above). The allegations of the original bill filed by appellee Arnold do not bring the case within the influence of §§ 79, 80 of Code 1940, Title 34. … Burns v. Shapley, 16 Ala.App. 297 , 77 So. 447 ; Kirkbride v. Harvey, 139 Ala. 231 , 35 So. 848 ; Neville v. Reed, 134 Ala. 317 , 32 So. 659 , 92 Am.St.Rep. 35 ; Murphree v.

Glidewell v. Town of Gantt

176 F. Supp. 2d 1257 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 10, 2001

Board of County Commissioners v. … V.

Samek v. Sanders

788 So. 2d 872 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 17, 2000

McCoy v. McCoy , 549 So.2d 53 , 57 (Ala. 1989). See also McCrary v. Butler , 540 So.2d 736 (Ala. 1989); Jones v. Jones , 470 So.2d 1207 (Ala. 1985); Clark v. … HOOPER, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Yeldell

36 Ala. App. 652 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1953

Brown’s outer office, and went in to see Mr. Brown when Mr. Yeldell left through another door which opened directly onto the corridor. “At about 1:30 P.M. Mr. … Brown that he would be with him in just a minute, and he went into the washroom, Mr. Brown went back to his office and Mr. Walsh rang for the elevator. At that time Mr.

State ex rel. Tyson v. Houghton

142 Ala. 90 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1904

Bank of Mobile, 33 Ala. 693 ; George v. Skeaters, 19 Ala. 738 ; Brick. Dig. p. 463, §§ 44, 45; Sedgwick’s Stat. and Const. … In Parker v. Hubbard, 64 Ala. 207 , it was said, there quoting from Sedgwick on Stat. & Con.

Decker v. Hays

282 Ala. 93 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 4, 1968

Bailey v. City of Mobile, 277 Ala. 111 , 167 So.2d 294 ; Tankersley v. Webb, 263 Ala. 234 , 82 So.2d 259 . … Locklear v. Nash, 275 Ala. 95 , 152 So.2d 421 .

Alabama Independent Service Station Ass'n v. McDowell

242 Ala. 424 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 29, 1942

*426 BROWN, Justice. … Mellott v. Board of Com’rs of Wyandotte County, 128 Kan. 516 , 279 P. 1 ; Perry v. City of Elizabethton, 160 Tenn. 102 , 22 S.W.2d 359 .” See Holland v. Flinn, 239 Ala. 390 , 195 So. 265, 267 .

Fountain v. State Ex Rel. Hybart

211 Ala. 586 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 12, 1924

Commissioners’ Court v. Moore, 53 Ala. 25 . Very clearly, then, petitioners acquired a valuable right by the action of the board of revenue in auditing and allowing their claim. … Board, 10 Iowa, 157 , 74 Am. Dec. 381 ; Dane v. Derby, 54 Me. 95 , 89 Am. Dee. 722; 18 R. C. D. 349, § 305; Tapping on'Mandamus, 362; 26 Oyc. 464, 465).

Bracken v. Mullins

263 Ala. 402 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 18, 1955

City of Meridian v. Davidson, 211 Miss. 683 , 53 So.2d 48 (1). … Touart v. State, 173 Ala. 453 , 56 So. 211 . It finally remains to consider whether or not the decision of the Board was justified under the facts.

Henry v. State

675 So. 2d 45 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 3, 1995

the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a “neutral and detached” hearing body such as a traditional parole board … See Brown v. State, 515 So.2d 146 (Ala. Crim.App.1987); Salter v. State, 470 So.2d 1360 (Ala.Crim.App.1985).

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Britt

203 So. 3d 804 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 29, 2016

Brown, 496 So.2d 756, 758 (Ala. 1986). … Co. v. Brown, 832 So.2d 1, 12 (Ala.2001). There is no shortage of speculation as to what happened to the sailboat.

Lang v. State

1 Ala. App. 128 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1911

—Gordon v. State, 129 Ala. 113 , 30 South. 30 ; Longmire v. State, 130 Ala. 66 , 30 South. 143 ; Gandy v. State, 86 Ala. 20 , 5 South. 420 . … Brown, Mr. Thomas, and Lonnie Lang, to which each of those persons made some objection.

Karr v. State

100 Ala. 4 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1893

—Ex parte Brown, 63 Ala. 187 ; Brown v. State, 74 Ala. 478 ; Roberts v. State, 68 Ala. 156 ; Storey v. State, 71 Ala. 329 ; Rogers v. State, 62 Ala. 170 ; De Armon v. State, 71 Ala. 351 ; Myers v. State, 62 Ala. 599 . … —De Armon v. State, 71 Ala. 351 ; Lanq v. State, 84 Ala. 1 ; Smith v. State, 88 Ala. 73 . It was shown that deceased had received an anonymous letter about two months before the homicide occurred.

Cantrell v. Stewart

628 So. 2d 543 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 15, 1993

This Court overruled an application for rehearing, and a final certificate of judgment was issued in Bullen v. Brown. The plaintiffs then sued their attorney, alleging malpractice in the Bullen v. Brown case. … Brown. In reversing the summary judgment for the attorney, we held: "In this case, unlike Michael v.

Ex parte Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama and Employees' Retirement System of Alabama v. Baldwin County Planning and Zoning Department; Baldwin County Board of Adjustment No. 1; and Point Clear Property Owners Association, Inc.) (Baldwin Circuit Court: CV-21-900858; Civil Appeals CL-2022-0697).

Supreme Court of Alabama · May 2, 2025

See Hanes v. … ("PCPOA"), to appeal to the Baldwin County Board of Adjustment ("the Board") as a "person aggrieved" was not an issue that implicated the Board's subject-matter jurisdiction. See Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v.

Fraternal Order of Police, Strawberry Lodge 40 v. Entrekin

294 Ala. 201 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 22, 1975

Chicago Mercantile Exchange v. Deaktor, 414 U.S. 113 , 94 S.Ct. 466 , 38 L.Ed.2d 344 ; Ricci v. … Plaintiffs cite us to Calagaz v.