Case law

State v. Callahan

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 24, 1997

The Tennessee Supreme Court has addressed the issues of premeditation and deliberation in State v. Brown, 836 S.W .2d 530 (Tenn. 1992), and in State -8- v. … Unlike Brown, repeated shots were not integral to proving the case at bar. In Brown, the Defendant beat his three-year-old son to death. Brown, 836 S.W.2d at 534.

DAVIS, ARTHUR v. BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - MEMPHIS

2026 TN WC 24 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 18, 2026

The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

State Ex Rel. Washington Industries, Inc. v. Shacklett

512 S.W.2d 284 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1974

The meeting of the new board was recessed for sixty days until April 14, 1973. … Appellants’ reliance is on the landmark case of Italo Petroleum Corp. v. Producers Oil Corp., 20 Del.Ch. 283 , 174 A. 276 [1934].

Copas v. Copas

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 27, 1998

Brown v. Brown, 847 S.W.2d 496, 499 (Tenn. 1993). As the instant case demonstrates, the UCCJA has not always had its intended effect. … * * * V. Analysis In the landmark case of Brown v.

Mayor of Memphis v. Halsey

59 Tenn. 210 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1873

This view was repeated in the case of The State v. The Bank of East Tennessee, 5 Sneed, 573 , and again in Ward v. … The case of The State v. E. F. Hall, 3 Col., 256 , was decided upon the same principle.

Lodge Mfg. Co. v. Gilbert

195 Tenn. 403 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1953

Trades Council v. *407 Ledbetter, 256 Ala. 678 , 57 So. (2d) 112 , it was held that the Taft-Hartley Act determined the rights of the parties, but sustained the jurisdiction of the State Court on account of the urgent need … In Nashville Corp. v. United Steelworkers, etc., 187 Tenn. 444 , 215 S.

DENNIS, ROBERTA v. KNOX COUNTY SCHOOLS

2025 TN WC 88 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 4, 2025

Inds., Inc. v. Sloan, 1988 Tenn. App. LEXIS 592, at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. … See Williamson v. Prof. Care Servs., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

State ex rel. Kercheval v. Mayor of Nashville

83 Tenn. 697 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1885

But it is sufficient to say, as to-this, that the course pursued in that court was in substantial compliance with the practice approved or suggested, in the case of The State ex rel., v. Board of Inspectors, 6 Lea, 18 . … The ordinance abolishing the salary being void, it cannot affect the legal rights of the. relator: Burch v. Baxter, 12 Heis., 603.

Mayor of Memphis v. Halsey

59 Tenn. 210 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1873

This view was repeated in the case of The State v. The Bank of East Tennessee, 5 Sneed, 573 , and again in Ward v. … The case of The State v. E. F. Hall, 3 Col., 256 , was decided upon the same principle.

Muncy, Rick O. v. Premium Distrbutors, Inc.

2019 TN WC 84 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 24, 2019

MUNCY, ) Docket No. 2017-03-0447 Employee, ) v. ) PREMIUM DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ) State File No. 54717-2016 Employer, ) And ) FFVA MUTUAL INSURANCE ) Judge Lisa A. … McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Kesterson v. Varner

172 S.W.3d 556 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 27, 2005

Wall v. Wall, 907 S.W.2d 829, 834 (Tenn.App. 1995). Thomson v. Thomson, No. 03A01-9809-CH-00308, 1999 WL 894446, at *8 (Tenn.Ct.App. Oct. 18, 1999). This same analysis was applied by this Court in Brown v. … Brown, 1998 WL 760935, at *8 n.3. In Richardson v. Richardson, No. W2000-02374-COA-R3- CV, 2001 WL 687074, (Tenn.Ct.App.

McLaughlin v. State

512 S.W.2d 657 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 15, 1974

Brown v. Grosch, 177 Tenn. 619 , 152 S.W.2d 239 . See also: State ex rel. Sandford v. Cate, 199 Tenn. 195 , 285 S.W.2d 343 . … Johnson v. Turner, 207 Tenn. 93 , 338 S.W.2d 558 ; State ex rel. Brown v.

Franklin v. Shelby County Schools

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 15, 2021

The Court finds that, given that a plaintiff’s burden at the prima facie stage is “minimal,” Brown v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov’t, 483 F. App’x 221, 225 (6th Cir. 2012) (citing EEOC v. … Yazdian, 793 F.3d at 645 (quoting Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1313 (6th Cir. 1989)).

Lee, Thomas v. Federal Express Corporation

2016 TN WC 193 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 26, 2016

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Aug. 18, 2015). … Willis v. All Staff, No. 2014-05-0005, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at * 18 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Nov. 9, 2015); see also Tenn.

William Horton v. Dept. of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 12, 1999

In addition to the board itself, the proper parties to a certiorari proceeding are the individuals or entitles who were parties to the dispute at the board level. Levy v. … Gilley v. Jernigan, 597 S.W.2d 313, 318 (Tenn. Ct. App. 197 9). -5- approves the board’s recommendation. Mandela v.

Vestal v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, ETC.

245 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 16, 1965

Defendants rely on Lodge No. 42 v. … His interpretation has been affirmed by the General Executive Board.

Michael Kindall v. Jim H. Rose - Concurring

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 7, 1997

Henry v. Board of Claims, 638 S.W.2d 825 (M.D. Tenn. 1982); Clark v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville, 827 S.W.2d 312 (M.D. Tenn. 1991). … Henry v. Board of Claims, 638 S.W.2d 825 (M.D. Tenn. 1982 Clark v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville, 827 S.W.2d 312 (M.D. Tenn. 1991).

Antuan J. Foxx v. James Neely

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 21, 2003

Foxx’s primary function was to mount transformers on circuit boards. … It is generally held that courts must affirm the Board of Review if there is any evidence to support the Board’s decision, unless the Board’s decision is contrary to the law. Perryman v.

State of Tennessee v. Nicholas Grace

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 29, 2016

State v. Davis, 354 S.W.3d 718, 729 (Tenn. 2011) (citing State v. Majors, 318 S.W.3d 850, 857 (Tenn. 2010)). … App. 1990) (citing State v. Brown, 551 S.W.2d 329, 331 (Tenn. 1977); Farmer v. State, 343 S.W.2d 895, 897 (Tenn. 1961)).

United States v. Williams

428 F. Supp. 2d 745 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 17, 2006

Brown knew Defendant by his nickname of Drago. Brown testified two of her friends, who were also under 18 years old and in high school at the time, were involved in the scheme as well. … See United States v.