Case law

Opinion No. 70-155 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 1970

See Alias v. City of Tulsa, Okl., 408 P.2d 517 (1965); Application of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, Okl., 416 P.2d 860 (1966). … Sanchez v. Melvin, Okl., 418 P.2d 639 (1966); Taff v. State, Okl., 425 P.2d 970 (1966).

Young v. State

29 Okla. Crim. 60 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1925

Zeke stood on the running board of the car. … O’Neal v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 386 , 188 P. 1092 ; Arnold v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 519 , 178 P. 897 ; Litchfield v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 173 , 126 P. 707 , 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 153; Gritts v. State, 6 Okla.

State v. Madden

562 P.2d 1177 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1977

Brown, sitting without a jury on the 10th day of March, 1976. All evidence was presented at that time. … Judge Brown in his court minute of June 14th, 1976, reasoned as follows: “. . .

Opinion No. 77-192 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1977

In addition, he shall advise the Board and perform legal services for the Board with respect to any other matters properly before the Board as directed by the Board." … Otjen v.

Holland v. Cofield

27 Okla. 469 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1910

See, also, Lewis v. Atherton et al., 5 Okla. 90; McCormick v. Bonfils, 9 Okla. 605 ; Eldridge v. Stenger et al., 19 Wash. 697 , 54 Pac. 541 ; Hoyt v. Jones, 31 Wis. 389 ; Ehle v. Brown, 31 Wis. 405 ; Collingwood v. … Brown, 106 N. C. 362 , 10 S. E. 869 ; Jackson & Sharp Co. v. Pearson, 60 Fed. 113 ; 21 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law (2nd Ed.), pp. 650, 651. A lis pendens vendor’s lien claim is an encumbrance under the term “or otherwise.”

Opinion No. 74-259 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1975

' awarded by the board of education? … The applicable rule is stated in the second paragraph of the syllabus by the court in City of Tulsa v.

Byrd v. State Ex Rel. Roff

99 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924

Eldridge, supra, and cites the case of Bartlett et al. v. … of education of the town of Eoraker, and that the entire membership of said board was now vacant.

St. Louis S. F. R. v. Travelers' Corp. of Oklahoma

47 Okla. 374 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1915

Co. v. State et al., 23 Okla. 210 , 100 Pac. 11 , 21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 908; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. State et al., 23 Okla. 510 , 101 Pac. 262 ; Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. … Co. v. State et al., 24 Okla. 370 , 103 Pac. 617 , 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 393; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Newell et al., 25 Okla. 502 , 106 Pac. 818 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v.

Opinion No. 72-162 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 7, 1972

Home-Stake Production Company v. Board of Equalization of Seminole County, Okl., 416 P.2d 917 (1966). … City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R. Co., 168 F.2d 252 (10th Cir. 1948). Accordingly, the cases in Oklahoma have consistently adhered to the rule set forth in Tulsa Exposition Fair Corporation v.

Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 2 of Garfield Cty. v. Beeson

30 Okla. 802 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1911

In Moore v. … See Gilmore v. Fox, 10 Kan. 509 ; Hays v. Hill, 17 Kan. 360 ; Voss v. School District, 18 Kan. 471 ; 30 Cyc. 40.

Opinion No. 71-242 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1971

earlier being special and the later general, a presumption exists, in absence of express repeal or absolute incompatibility, that the special statute is to remain in force as an exception to the general, State ex rel King v. … statutes is to determine the intent of the legislative body in enacting such statutes, and if two or more enactments are involved, the primary object, then is to determine the latest expression of legislative will, Trask v.

Opinion No. 71-275 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1971

An officer under 51 O.S. 6 [ 51-6 ] (1961), was defined in Sparks v. … Jur. 880 ; Farley v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 .

Davis v. State

916 P.2d 251 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1996

In Hanf v. … Valdez v. State, 900 P.2d 363, 389, n. 79 (Okl.Cr.1995); Hyatt v. State, 779 P.2d 993, 995 (Okl.Cr.1989); Holt v. State, 774 P.2d 476, 478 (Okl.Cr.1989); Jones v. State, 772 P.2d 922, 924-25 (Okl.Cr.1989); Drew v.

Opinion No. 75-127 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1975

Title 59 O.S. 396 .17 [ 59-396.17 ] (1971) expresses the powers of the Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors: "Said Board shall have the power . . . to make, adopt and promulgate and enforce reasonable rules and regulations … City of Tulsa v. Goins, 437 P.2d 257 , 259 (1967) .

Opinion No. 75-205 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 24, 1975

the excise board. … The leading Oklahoma ease defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, Okl., 82 P.2d 324 (1938).

Coffey v. Robert McMullan & Son, Inc.

570 P.2d 1152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1977

Department of Highways v. … However, in State Board of Public Affairs v.

WEAVER v. DOE

371 P.3d 1170 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 2016

According to the West Virginia Court in Brown ex rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 228 W.Va. 646 , 724 S.E.2d 250, 267 (2011) cert. granted, judgment vacated sub nom. Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. … See also, eg., Preston v.

Bowen v. State

586 P.2d 67 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1978

In Brown v. … We note that the State in its brief relies on the following language from Draper v. State, Okl.Cr., 562 P.2d 155 (1977) and Branch v.

IN THE MATTER OF THE STRIKING OF NAMES OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION

2024 OK 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 2024

This Court further finds that the actions of the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma Bar Association are in compliance with the Rules. … Higgins 420 S Lawton Ave Apt 517 Tulsa, OK 74127-8929 OBA # 14351 Robert Earl Jones Jr. 1819 Rolling Hills St Norman, OK 73072-6707 OBA # 11125 Theodore Koss Jr. 10604 Admiral Dr Oklahoma City, OK 73162-6806 OBA # 5240 John V.

Opinion No. 77-239 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1977

In the case of Spearman v. … In the case of Rosen v. New York City Teacher's Retirement Board, et al., 115 N.Y.