Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

0.43s

  • DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 10, 2022

    See Johnson v. … Doe, 713 F.3d at 758 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 319 (4th Cir. 2006)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State v. DUBAR

    165 N.C. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2004

    After walking several blocks, Debose continued toward his home without Brown. Shortly thereafter, Brown heard eleven shots fired. … In State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Holanek

    242 N.C. App. 633 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2015

    the Meadowsweet pet boarding charges. … Meadowsweet Pet Boarding and Grooming. - 18 - STATE V.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State v. Staten

    271 N.C. 600 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1967

    G.S. 15-4.1; G.S. 15-180; G.S. 15-221; S. v. Roux, 263 N.C. 149 , 139 S.E. 2d 189 ; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 ; 9 L. Ed. 2d 811 , reh. den. 373 U.S. 905 , 10 L. Ed. 2d 200 ; Griffin v. … About that time Jesse Earl Brown and June Lindsey were coming up from McDowell Street. He asked Jesse Earl Brown where' his sister was.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Calhoun v. Southeastern Container

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 27, 1996

    Brown note of January 20, 1992 and Dr. Brown deposition, p. 7). Plaintiff's treating doctor, Dr. Brown, rendered a specific opinion of her ability to work as follows: Q. All right. Did you form an opinion as to Mrs. … Richards v. Town of Valdese , 92 N.C. App. 222 , 374 S.E.2d 116 (1988), cert. denied , 324 N.C. 337 , 378 S.E.2d 799 (1989). 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patterson v. McLean Credit Union

    130 F.R.D. 617 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 24, 1990

    Stuart, 85 N.C.App. 338 , 354 S.E.2d 757 (1987), and Brown v. … Brown, 93 N.C.App. at 434 , 378 S.E.2d at 234 (quoting Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club, 79 N.C.App. 483 , 340 S.E.2d 116 , disc. rev. denied, 317 N.C. 334 , 346 S.E.2d 140 (1986).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Hernandez

    360 N.C. 539 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 2006

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • North Carolina Ass'n of Educators, Inc. v. State

    368 N.C. 777 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2016

    In Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U.S. 319 , 57 S. Ct. 483 , 81 L. … Bd. of Educ. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of Society for Preservation of Historic Oakwood

    571 S.E.2d 588 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 2002

    Raleigh Rescue Mission, Inc., and Coggins Construction Company, Petitioners, v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Raleigh, The Society for the Preservation of Historic Oakwood and Mozelle Jones, Respondents. No. … See Midgette v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • R.S. V. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WOODS CHARTER SCHOOL COMPANY

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 25, 2021

    Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., Chevrolet Div., 722 F.2d 1009, 1011 (2d Cir. 1983) (emphasis added). … See Mary Helen Coal Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Appeal of Tadlock

    261 N.C. 120 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1964

    Johnson v. Board of Education, 241 N.C. 56 , 84 S.E. 2d 256 ; Jarrell v. *124 Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476 , 128 S.E. 2d 879 . … In Commissioners v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Ledwell v. Proctor

    221 N.C. 161 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1942

    Cohoon v. Swain, 216 N. C., 317 , 5 S. E. (2d), 1 . In canvassing tbe returns and judicially determining tbe result tbe board of canvassers must pass upon tbe legality of any disputed ballots. Burgin v. … E., 817 ; S. v. Jackson, 183 N. C., 695 , 110 S. E., 593 ; Gohoon v. Swain, supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bunch v. Commissioners of Randolph County

    159 N.C. 335 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1912

    of Trustees v. … C., 383 ; Crocker v. Moore, 140 N. C., 429 ; Tate v. Commissioners, 122 N.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Crutchfield

    5 N.C. App. 586 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 13, 1969

    State v. Phillip, 261 N.C. 263 , 134 S.E. 2d 386 ; State v. Lane, 258 N.C. 349 , 128 S.E. 2d 389 . … In State v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. White

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2026

    In Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50 (1979), the U.S. … Defendant concedes that the checkpoint “advances the public interest” under Brown’s first prong, Brown, 443 U.S. - 19 - STATE V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McNair v. . Cooper

    174 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1917

    Brown, J. … Lee v. McKoy, 118 N. C., 518 ; Byrd v. Byrd, 117 N. C., *568 523; Smith v. Brown, 99 N. C., 377 .” To tbe same effect are: Tremble v. Jones, 7 N. C., 579 ; Long v. Oxford, 108 N. C., 280 ; Tilley v. Brown, 112 N.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. . Hargrave

    103 N.C. 328 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889

    Harris v. Burwell, 65 N. C., 584 ; Havens v. Potts, 86 N. C., 31 . … Brink v. Black, 77 N. C., 59 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Williams v. N.C. D.O.C.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 7, 2003

    Teer Company v. State Highway Commission , 265 N.C. 1 , 143 S.E.2d 247 (1965). … Bolkir v. NCSU , 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 898 (1988). 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • London v. Commissioners

    193 N.C. 100 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 1927

    Miller v. Groome, 109 N. C., 148 ; Dumas v. Morrison, 175 N. C., 431 ; Caldwell v. Robinson, 179 N. C., 518 ; Hardy v. Thornton, 192 N. C., 296 ; Greer v. Comrs., 192 N. C., 714 . … C., 45 ; Fore v. Feimster, 171 N. C., 551 ; Wright v. Kinney, 123 N. C., 618 . Did the commissioners act in their official capacity upon the question of this supplemental contract?

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Abernathy v. . Phifer

    84 N.C. 711 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1881

    The allowance of a claim by a county board of commissioners is not final and conclusive. Such an allowance is only prima facie evidence of the correctness of the claim. In the case of Commissioners v. … It may be reexamined by the board itself, and on appeal may be examined or disallowed in whole or in part by the court, and it. is error to instruct the jury that the allowance of a claim by the board is an adjudication as

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.