Case law

Hinson v. Brown

80 N.C. App. 661 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 1986

Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Weaver, 310 N.C. 93, 103, 310 S.E. 2d 338, 344 (1984). … Kanoy v. Hinshaw, 273 N.C. 418 , 160 S.E. 2d 296 (1968). Under the circumstances of the instant case we consider Judge Walker’s questions asked of the jury non-prejudicial. See State v.

State v. Brown

641 S.E.2d 806 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 17, 2007

State v. Brown

120 N.C. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1995

The facts of this case are set forth in State v. Brown, 116 N.C. App. 445 , 448 S.E.2d 131 (1994). … State v. Corn, 307 N.C. 79, 85 , 296 S.E.2d 261, 266 (1982). N.C. Gen.

State v. Brown

248 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1958

S. v. Lassiter, 208 N.C. 251 , 179 S.E. 891 . See also S. v. Shew, 194 N.C. 690 , 140 S.E. 621 ; S. v. Barbee, 197 N.C. 248 , 148 S.E. 249 . … S v. Lassiter, supra. Venire de novo.

Alexander v. Brown

239 N.C. 527 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1954

appeal adjudging the plaintiff’s evidence ample to carry the case to the jury and support a verdict against the defendant Brown upon the cause of action for malicious prosecution. … Mintz v. R. R., 236 N.C. 109 , 72 S.E. 2d 38 . This conclusion necessitates a reversal of the involuntary nonsuit upon the second cause of action. No error upon cause of action for false arrest and imprisonment.

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 538 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 2006

State v. Brown

18 N.C. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1973

Schrecengost that “this man (indicating Brown) to whom I am now taking a look ... is the man that was standing in front of me in Horne’s Motor Lodge on the night of December 25th when I was shot and robbed,” or that defendant … State v. McVay and State v. Simmons, 279 N.C. 428 , 183 S.E. 2d 652 (1971). This assignment of error is overruled.

Brown v. . Osteen

197 N.C. 305 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1929

In Meadows Co. v. Bryan, 195 N. C., at p. 401, the law is stated as follows: “There is no provision in the notes executed by E. W. … The court has read to you from the case of McNair v. Finance Co., Book 191, at bottom page 718 of the N. C., Report.” May v. Loomis, 140 N. C., at p. 359.

State v. Brown

628 S.E.2d 868 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 22, 2006

State v. Brown

636 S.E.2d 813 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2006

636 S.E.2d 813 (2006) STATE of North Carolina v. Thomas Lloyd BROWN. No. 437P06. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 5, 2006. Thomas Lloyd Brown, Pro Se. Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Kristy M.

Newton v. . Brown

152 N.C. 200 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 23, 1910

BrowN, J., after stating the facts: 1.

Vanderbilt v. Brown.

128 N.C. 498 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1901

In Attorney General v. … Witsell v. R. R. , 120 N.C. 557 ; Bottoms v. R. R. , 109 N.C. 72 .

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 484 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 2006

State v. Brown

636 S.E.2d 569 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 23, 2006

Defendant (Paul Brown) shall have up to and including the 11th day of November 2006 to file and his petition for writ of certiorari with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of August 2006."

Brown v. Flowers

297 F. Supp. 2d 846 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 12, 2003

For example, in Ciena Corp. v. … Brown has not sufficiently alleged that he was an original owner of the songs in question, or that Mr. Flowers transferred any rights to him, Mr. Flowers’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. V.

State v. Brown

361 N.C. 169 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2006

Brown v. Overby

61 N.C. App. 329 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1983

We are constrained to hold that the present case is controlled by Byrd v. Watts Hospital, 29 N.C. App. 564 , 225 S.E. 2d *331 329 (1976), wherein the facts are practically identical.

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 538 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 2006

Morisey v. . Brown

144 N.C. 154 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1907

University v. Borden, 132 N. C., 416 . The appellant, conceding this to be the law, insists that the devise of “all the residue of my lands in Sampson County” is a residuary devise. We do not concur in that view.

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 538 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 2006