Case law

Brown v. Marks

45 Okla. 711 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1915

Harrison v. Penny, 28 Okla. 523 , 114 Pac. 734 ; Ft. Smith & W. R. Co. v. State Nat. Bank, 25 Okla. 128 , 105 Pac. 647 ; First Nat. Bank v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383 , 108 Pac. 748 ; Cooper v. … Laws 1910, sec. 5244; Upton v. Am. Trust Co., 31 Okla. 456 , 122 Pac. 159 ; Ripey v. Art Wall Paper Mill, 27 Okla. 600 , 112 Pac. 1119 ; Hess v. Harrah v, 28 Okla. 627 , 115 Pac. 790 ; Harrison v.

Brown v. Massey

19 Okla. 482 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1907

"Mary Massey, Plaintiff, "v. "Nellie Brown and D. G. Tutt, Defendants, and L. N. Beadles, as Successor in Interests to Defendants, Defendant. "Answer to Petition of Plaintiff. "Comes now the defendants and L. N. … *Page 488 And in Kimball v.

Brown v. State

89 Okla. Crim. 389 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 1949

Plaintiff in error above, defendant in error below, V. O. … Brown, was charged by information in the district court of Bryan county, Obla., with the crime of murder, alleged to have been committed on or about July 22, 1946, on the person of Joe Pangle by means of a pistol.

Brown v. Coppadge

54 Okla. 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1915

Laws 1910; Canadian Coal Co. v. … Laws 1910; City of Tecumseh v. Burns et al., 30 Okla. 503 , 120 Pac. 270 ; Kansas City Bridge Co. v. Lindsay Bridge Co., 32 Okla. 31 , 121 Pac. 639 ; Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v.

Brown v. State

5 Okla. Crim. 567 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 23, 1911

D. 1909, in said county and state, one Ofa Brown did then and there wilfully, knowingly, and unlawfully have in his possession certain intoxicating liquor, to wit, one barrel of bottled beer, with the unlawful intent to then … In the case of Bonitzer v. State, 4 Okla.

Brown v. State

384 P.2d 54 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1963

McGuire v. State, 239 Ala,. 564, 194 So. 815 . And see State v. … In Lyons v.

Brown v. Davidson

42 Okla. 598 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1914

Culbertson v. Mann, 30 Okla. 249 , 120 Pac. 918 ; Amer. Job. Ass’n v. … The facts of this case, therefore, bring it squarely within the rule announced by the Territorial Supreme Court in the case of Brown v.

Haynes v. Brown

18 Okla. 389 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1907

Haynes agreed to sell Miss Brown 20 shares of stock in a corporation; he was to transfer and assign the stock to her and procure its transfer upon the books of the company; she was then to pay him $2000; they each deposited … The trial court held that the case fell within the rule announced by this court in the case of Mansur-Tebbetts Co. v. Willett, 10 Okla. 383 , and we think this correct in several particulars.

Brown v. State

405 P.2d 698 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1965

And, as recently stated in Melchor v. … This Court held in the case of Antuna v.

Brown v. Baird

5 Okla. 133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1897

Brown in the of $59.77, balance alleged to be due upon a bill of lumber purchased and received by Brown from the Reno Lumber company. … (Hasse v. Nonnemacher, 21 Minn. 486 ; Maxwell v. Lee, 34 Minn. 511 ; Comstock v. Sanger, 51 Mich. 497 ; Zabriskie v. C. V. R. R. Co. 131 N. Y. 72 .)

BROWN v. ALLEY

384 P.3d 496 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 2016

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ¶3 Appellant Rhonda Brown and Bobby Joe Brown, Jr. were married on December 12,1996, and three children were born of the marriage. One child is deceased. … See gen., Mueggenborg v. Walling, 1992 OK 121 , 836 P.2d 112 , citing Rath v. Maness, 1970 OK 111, 15 , 470 P.2d 1011, 1013 . .

Brown v. Wrightsman

175 Okla. 189 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1935

Brown.” … This court, in the case of Walker v.

Rider v. Brown

1 Okla. 244 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1893

Brown and Thomas Jenson, canvassed the votes cast at said election, on the 19th day of .February, 1891, with the above result, and that he requested said board of county commissioners to deliver to him a certificate of said … board, and said county canvassing board shall meet on the Friday next following said election, and canvass the returns and declare the result of said election, and the county clerk shall thereupon immediately issue to all

Rogers v. Brown

15 Okla. 524 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1905

(Frame v. Ryel. 14 Okla. 536 .) … (Blankenship, Receiver, v. Power Co. 4 Okla. 242 .)

Brown v. Woods

2 Okla. 601 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1895

Brown v. Parks

80 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1921

Park v. School District 65, 63 Okla 233, 164 Pac. 102 ; McGuire v. McGuire, 78 Okla 164, 189 Pac. 193 . … Chapter 18, Session Laws 1910-11; Thomason et al. v. Champlin, 43 Okla. 86 , 141 Pac. 411 . It follows, therefore, that the appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Brown v. State

81 Okla. Crim. 314 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1945

Brown, was charged in the district court of Okmulgee county with the crime of assault with a sharp and dangerous weapon, to wit: a pocket knife. … Williams v. State, 42 Okla. Cr. 399 , 276 P. 515 ; Foster v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 70 , 248 P. 847 ; Mendenhall v. United States, 6 Okla. Cr. 436 , 119 P. 594 ; Stealer v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 460 , 138 P. 395 ; Bryant v.

Fox v. Brown

176 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1936

Brown (c’aimant before the Industrial Commission) was awarded compensation for a 20 per cent, permanent partial loss of use of his left arm.' … Fike Co. v. Vice, 158 Okla. 243 , 13 P. (2d) 143 ; Boardman & Co. v. Clark, 166 Okla. 194 26 P. (2d) 906 ; U. S. F. & G. Co. v. Harrison, 125 Okla. 90 , 256 P. 752 .

Fritz v. Brown

20 Okla. 263 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1908

Ed. 153 ; District of Columbia v. Hutton, 143 U. S. 18 , 12 Sup. Ct. 369, 36 L. Ed. 60 ; Iverson v. … Brown from said J.

Brown v. Massey

13 Okla. 670 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1904

Co. v. … The defendants, Nellie Brown and D. G.