Case law

Brown v. Board of Directions

District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 1, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAMONTE BROWN, … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). Plaintiff consents to electronic service.

Chester v. . Dorr

41 N.Y. 279 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1869

No case in this State has called for a decision of the question ; and yet in Brown v. Mott (7 J. R., 361), and in Grant v. Ellicott ( 7 Wend., 227 ) the case of Charles v. … And that in other States in this country, such an exception to the general rule first above stated is repudiated, see Brown v. Hastings ( 36 Penn., 285 ); Britton v. Bishop ( 11 Vt., 70 ); Odiorne v. Howard (10 N.

United States v. Velazquez

197 F. Supp. 3d 481 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 24, 2016

Pavel v. … Bell v.

Calim of Gomez v. Windows On the World

23 A.D.3d 967 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 23, 2005

Matter of Barrow v Loon Lake Hotel, 3 AD2d 783, 783-784 [1957]; Matter of McLaskey v City of New York, 277 App Div 1068 , 1069 [1950]) and will instead review the record before us to ascertain whether the Board’s determination … Grill, supra at 884-885, with Matter of Brown, supra at 939, and Steele v Richardson, 472 F2d 49, 52-53 [1972]; see generally Dolan v Celebrezze, 381 F2d 231 [1967]), it is our view that Escalante has sufficiently established

Garcia v. New York State Division of Parole

239 A.D.2d 235 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1997

Herbert v New York State Bd. of Parole, 97 AD2d 128, 133 ). … Moreover, the Board is not required to expressly discuss each of the guidelines in its determination (Matter of King v New York State Div. of Parole, supra, 83 NY2d, at 791 ).

Brown v. Brown

88 A.D.3d 1174 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 27, 2011

Evidence regarding the mother’s forms of punishment, which partially led to an indicated report of inadequate guardianship, was sufficient to show a change of circumstances (see Matter of Terry I. v Barbara H., 69 AD3d 1146 … deference to that court’s credibility determinations and factual findings, which are supported by the record, the decision to modify physical custody has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Paul T. v

Brown v. Brown

97 A.D.3d 568 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 5, 2012

the circumstances” (Matter of Parliman v Labriola, 87 AD3d 1144, 1144 [2011]; see Matter of Nava v Kinsler, 85 AD3d 1186, 1186-1187 [2011]; Trinagel v Boyar, 70 AD3d 816 [2010]). … 898-899 [2012]; Matter of Picado v Doan, 90 AD3d 932 [2011]; White v Mazzella-White, 84 AD3d 1068 [2011]).

Brown v. Brown

239 A.D.2d 535 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 27, 1997

party’s maintenance or child support obligation, a court need not rely upon the party’s own account of his or her finances, but may impute income based upon the party’s past income or demonstrated earning potential (Kay v … Kay, 37 NY2d 632 ; Brodsky v Brodsky, 214 AD2d 599; Liadis v Liadis, 207 AD2d 331 ; Hollis v Hollis, 188 AD2d 960 ).

Brown v. Brown

185 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 3, 1992

McClure, 176 AD2d 325, 326 ; Matter of Andrews v Andrews, 168 AD2d 444 ; Matter of Gansburg v Gansburg, 127 AD2d 766 ; see also, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 ). … Leffingwell, 86 AD2d 929 ; see also, Merola v Merola, 146 AD2d 611 ; Kilmer v Kilmer, 109 AD2d 1004 ; Besharov, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, Family Ct Act § 842, at 194).

Brown v. . Brown

58 N.Y. 609 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1874

Brown v. Brown

266 N.Y. 532 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1935

Brown v. Brown

12 A.D.3d 176 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 4, 2004

“Beneficiaries enjoy only expectancy interests and not vested legal rights” (Blackmon v Estate of Battcock, 78 NY2d 735, 739 [1991]). … Capital v Karp Family Assoc., 285 AD2d 361, 362 [2001]). In any event, the tort claims were merely duplicative of the insufficiently pleaded breach of contract causes of action herein.

Brown v. Brown

242 A.D. 33 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 27, 1934

(Starbuck v. Starbuck, 173 N. Y. 503 ; Kelsey v. Kelsey, 204 App. Div. 116 ; affd., 237 N. Y. 520 ; Matter of Swales, 60 App. Div. 599 ; Simmonds v. Simmonds, 78 Misc. 571 .) … affirmance, with an additional finding of fact to the effect that the plaintiff herein had knowledge and acted in aid of the invalid divorce proceeding instituted in South Dakota by the present defendant against Vivina Haynes Brown

Brown v. Brown

123 A.D.3d 596 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 16, 2014

enumerated factors, explained how the factors support an upward deviation from the $13,100 a month in guideline support, and found that $37,000 per month was not “unjust or inappropriate” under the circumstances (Lennox v … The court providently exercised its discretion in making the award of temporary maintenance taxable to the wife (see Lasry *597 v Lasry, 180 AD2d 488, 489 [1st Dept 1992]; Siskind v Siskind, 89 AD3d 832, 833 [2d Dept 2011

Brown v. Brown

53 Barb. 217 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1869

(President, &c. of Bank of Poughkeepsie v. Hasbrouck, 2 Seld. 216. Glover v. Holley, 2 Brad. 291 . 2 R. S. 94, § 65.) This section declares as to what subjects it shall be conclusive. … This opinion was expressed in President, &c. of Bank of Poughkeepsie v. Hasbrouck, above cited.

Brown v. Brown

136 A.D.3d 852 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 17, 2016

In September 2005, Linton Brown executed a durable power of attorney naming his daughter Glenisha Brown as his attorney-in-fact as to certain matters. … Corp. v Tycoon Collections, Inc., 73 AD3d 719, 721 [2010]; Halstead v Dolphy, 70 AD3d 639, 639-640 [2010]).

Brown v. Brown

203 A.D. 658 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 29, 1922

Brown, deceased. The respondents are the executors and trustees appointed therein. The appellant is the widow of the testator. … Brown.

Brown v. Brown

34 Barb. 533 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1861

(Phelps v. Bostwick, 22 Barb. 314, 317 . Cole v. Wendel, 8 John. 116 . Waldron v. Willard, 17 N. Y. Rep. 468 . Davison v. Seymour, 1 *537 Bosw. 94 . Perkins v. Goodman, 21 Barb. 218 . Sheldon v. Peck, 13 id. 317 . … (Brown v. Treat, 1 Hill, 225 . Suydam v. Smith, 7 id. 182 . Miller v. Scherder, 2 Comst. 262. Lambert v. Snow, 17 How. 517 . McGovern v. Payn, 32 Barb. 91 .)

Brown v. Brown

148 A.D.2d 377 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 23, 1989

Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, New York County (Irving Kirschenbaum, J.), entered on or about June 7, 1988, which, inter alia, denied defendant Arthur Brown’s motion to vacate his default, granted plaintiff … *378 Delaine Brown’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee, and set out details of the distribution of real and personal property between the parties, is unanimously modified, on the law and facts, to the extent

Brown v. Brown

1 Barb. Ch. 189 · New York Court of Chancery · Oct 7, 1845

I had occasion to examine that question in the recent case of Vroom v. … (a) In Whyte, adm’r <j-e. v, Rose, (3 Ad. cf- El. N.