Case law

Brown v. Brown

615 S.E.2d 436 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 25, 2005

Brown v. Brown

104 N.C. App. 547 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1991

Defendant answered, denying the allegations of fault and seeking a divorce from bed and board. … Graves v. Walston, 302 N.C; 332, 275 S.E.2d 485 (1981).

BROWN & BROWN ENTERPRISES, LLC v. Brown

698 S.E.2d 201 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 9, 2010

698 S.E.2d 201 (2010) BROWN & BROWN ENTERPRISES, LLC v. BROWN. No. COA09-1665. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed July 20, 2010. Certification Date August 9, 2010. Case Reported Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

Brown v. Brown

171 N.C. App. 365 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2005

The 14 July 2004 order is the subject of a corollary appeal in Brown v. Brown, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (filed 5 July 2005, COA04-1189). … Because the 14 July 2004 order on contempt must be vacated for the reasons set forth in Brown v. Brown, ___ N.C.

In Re Housing Authority of City of Salisbury

235 N.C. 463 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1952

The College Board of Trustees, after considering the proposal, reached the conclusion and so notified the Housing Authority that they could not consent for any part of the campus to be put to use as a public housing site, … Price v. Whisnant, 232 N.C. 653 , 62 S.E. 2d 56 ; Sprinkle v. Reidsville, ante, 140; S. v. Murphy, post, 503.

Brown v. Brown

136 N.C. App. 331 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2000

The administratrix of the estate of Gladys Brown (“plaintiff”), Marsha T. … Russell (“Brown administratrix”), made a motion in the trial court to be substituted for plaintiff in the present action for equi *332 table distribution, a divorce from bed and board, alimony pendente lite and permanent

Brown v. Brown

19 N.C. App. 393 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1973

Brown v. Brown.

6 N.C. 350 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1818

If wc were informed by the records of the County Court of Wilkes that the nuncupative will of James Brown had been proved in Court, and we should *351 be furnished with a copy of it properly authenticated, I think we would … It does not appear that James Brown specially required cither of the witnesses to bear witness to what lie was saying $ the words he uttered were drawn from him by the person whose interest it is to establish them as a will

Brown v. Brown

335 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1994

Brown v. Brown

335 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1994

Brown v. Brown

341 N.C. 418 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 7, 1995

Brown v. Brown

320 N.C. 511 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 28, 1987

Brown v. Brown

331 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1992

Brown v. Brown

331 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1992

417 S.E.2d 789 (1992) 331 N.C. 383 Janet Ruth BROWN v. Elbert Ferrell BROWN. No. 85P92. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 7, 1992. Thomas B. Kakassy, Gastonia, for defendant. Lloyd T. Kelso, Gastonia, for plaintiff.

Brown v. Brown

317 N.C. 332 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1986

Brown v. Brown

307 N.C. 696 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1983

Brown v. Brown

308 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1983

Brown v. Brown

315 N.C. 389 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1986

Brown v. . Brown

42 N.C. 30 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1850

The will of James Brown contains the following clause : “'I will and bequeath to my three sons, James L. Brown, Alexander Brown, and William M. … been finished in a workmanlike manner, and made comfortable, have been the sort of house that was intended by the testator ; but it was left unfinished and the work put on it was not at all suitable ; it is not weather boarded

Brown v. Brown.

101 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888