Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

2.89s

  • Brown v. Board of Police Commissioners

    58 Cal. App. 2d 473 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1943

    Brown, decreeing that such respondents issue him a permit for the conduct of a game called “Defiance.” … In Jackson v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    780 A.2d 885 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2001

    Odgers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 514 Pa. 378 , 525 A.2d 359 (1987); Russell v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Volkswagen of America), 121 Pa.Cmwlth. 436 , 550 A.2d 1364 (1988). … Shrum v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 690 A.2d 796 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Summit County Board of Elections

    46 Ohio St. 3d 166 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1989

    The board of elections refuses to certify relator’s nominating petition under R.C. 3513.262. 1 In State, ex rel. Moss, v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Douglas and Wright, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Board of Election Canvassers

    45 W. Va. 826 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1899

    Brown obtained from this Court a rule against certain persons,, who constitute the board of election canvassers of Randolph County, to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not be awarded him to prohibit that board … Reasons for this conclusion are given in Brown v. County Court, 45 W. Va. 727 ( 32 S. E. 165 ), this day decided. Writ Granted.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. South Carolina State Board of Education

    296 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, D. South Carolina · May 31, 1968

    A review of the record, including the historical background of the Act, clearly reveals that the purpose, motive and effect of the Act is to unconstitutionally circumvent *203 the requirement first enunciated in Brown v. … See Lee v. Macon County Board of Education, 267 F.Supp. 458 (M.D.Ala.1967); Poindexter v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

    20 Cal. App. 3d 903 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1971

    The Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereafter WCAB) granted the petition for reconsideration. … Raischell & Cottrell, Inc. v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd., supra), not by resort to the Fund. We first note that the injury Brown suffered was an occupational disease. Drs.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Board of Review

    117 N.J. Super. 399 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 9, 1971

    BROWN, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND SOPHIA, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … The Board of Review agreed with the decision of the Appeal Tribunal, which denied benefits. The latter based its disqualification of claimant in reliance upon Stauhs v. Board of Review, 93 N.J. Super. 451 (App.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Board of Trustees Sealy Independent School District

    871 F. Supp. 2d 581 · District Court, S.D. Texas · May 9, 2012

    According to the Complaint, the Sealy ISD Board of Trustees (“Board”) was aware of Brown’s condition through Lechler, who also served as a trustee on the Board, but the Board did not give Brown any lesser sanction apart from … the SISD Board Defendants. v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    856 A.2d 302 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 2004

    Questioning the computation of her earning power, Gem Brown (Claimant) petitions for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board). … Moreover, Claimant failed to raise this issue before the Board. Therefore, it is twice waived. Mearion v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. (Franklin Smelting & Ref.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. New Haven Civil Service Board

    474 F. Supp. 1256 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Jul 27, 1979

    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (E.E.O.C.), and plaintiffs Brown and Nobles have received right to sue letters, thereby satisfying jurisdictional prerequisites to pursuing their Title VII claims here. … See Andre v. Board of Trustees, 561 F.2d 48 (7th Cir. 1977); Wardwell v. Board of Education, 529 F.2d 625 (6th Cir. 1976); Wright v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • R. D. Brown Contractors, Inc. v. Board of Education

    280 Ga. 210 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 13, 2006

    The Board is vested with the power to conduct its affairs. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VIII, Sec. V, Par. II; Colston v. Hutchinson, 208 Ga. 559, 560 ( 67 SE2d 763 ) (1951). … See Collins v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Public Works

    134 Minn. 204 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jul 28, 1916

    Board of Co. Commrs. of St. Louis County v. Nettleton, 22 Minn. 356 ; Davis v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Grant County, 75 Minn. 59 , 77 N. W. 548 . … Board of Co. Commrs. of Houston County v. Jessup, 22 Minn. 552 . He may show the unauthorized insertion of taxes for past years, County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , 17 N. W. 473, 944 ; Wass v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Board of Education

    211 A.D.2d 887 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 5, 1995

    judgment of the Supreme Court (Tait, Jr., J.), entered September 10, 1993 in Madison County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to *888 review a determination of respondent Board … of Schimmel v Board of Educ., Ill AD2d 966, 968).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    150 Pa. Commw. 614 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1992

    In Kachinski v. … In Young v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Board of Commissioners

    38 Kan. 436 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 15, 1888

    (Also see The State, ex rel., v. Stevens, 23 Kas. 456 ; The State, ex rel., v. Comm’rs of Hodgeman Co., 23 id. 268; Hagerty v. … Brown has been duly elected county commissioner of said first district, and that said board issue a certificate of election to him therefor. By the Court: It is so ordered. All the Justices concurring.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Orange County Board of Public Instruction

    128 So. 2d 181 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 23, 1960

    Board of Trustees, Fla. 1959, 115 So.2d 697 . The defendants answer that Doremus v. … Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 15 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 ; Fowler v. State of Rhode Island, 345 U.S. 67 , 73 S.Ct. 526 , 97 L.Ed. 828 ; Zorach v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State Board of Examiners of Psychologists

    190 Ga. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Feb 14, 1989

    In early April of 1985 the Board sent an application to Dr. Brown, along with a copy of the Board rules and regulations as they existed prior to March 28, 1985. Dr. … Brown from meeting the Board’s educational requirements at the time of his application. 2.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    138 Pa. Commw. 560 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1991

    Brown (Claimant) petitions for review of the June 29,1990 order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the referee denying Claimant workmen’s compensation benefits. … Torres v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Modern Mushroom Farm, Inc.), 129 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 372, *565 565 A.2d 857 (1989); Nationwide Ins. Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Teachers' Retirement Board

    239 A.D. 178 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1933

    On March 24, 1923, petitioner was advised by the defendant that he had been classified as “ present-teacher " by the unanimous vote of the board. … (See Matter of Everitt v. Teachers’ Retirement Board, 135 Mise. 916; affd., 229 App. Div. 857 ; Matter of Goldstein v. Teachers’ Retirement Board , 235 id. 668.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Village Board of Education

    40 Ohio St. 3d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1988

    The ultimate issue in this case is whether Brown is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the board to award her a retroactive continuing teaching contract and back pay. … The court of appeals held that Brown was entitled to be paid for the school years 1980-1981 through 1986-1987 in accordance with the board’s duly adopted teacher’s salary schedules.

    Cited 27 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.