Case law

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 2002

Coll. v. … Dist. v. Wis.

Opinion No. 75-205 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 24, 1975

the excise board. … The leading Oklahoma ease defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, Okl., 82 P.2d 324 (1938).

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 1994

For example, see O'Brien v. … In Williams Petroleum Co. v.

Arthur Andersen LLP v. Standard & Poor's Credit

260 F. Supp. 2d 1123 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2003

Zink Co. v. Zink, 241 F.3d 1256, 1259 (10th Cir.2001). … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 , 106 S.Ct. 466 , 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985); Haney v. Addison, 175 F.3d 1217 (10th Cir. 1999); and Talley v. Hesse, 91 F.3d 1411 (10th Cir.1996). February 18, 2003. 1 .

IN THE MATTER OF THE STRIKING OF NAMES OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION

2024 OK 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 2024

This Court further finds that the actions of the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma Bar Association are in compliance with the Rules. … Higgins 420 S Lawton Ave Apt 517 Tulsa, OK 74127-8929 OBA # 14351 Robert Earl Jones Jr. 1819 Rolling Hills St Norman, OK 73072-6707 OBA # 11125 Theodore Koss Jr. 10604 Admiral Dr Oklahoma City, OK 73162-6806 OBA # 5240 John V.

Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 2 of Garfield Cty. v. Beeson

30 Okla. 802 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1911

In Moore v. … See Gilmore v. Fox, 10 Kan. 509 ; Hays v. Hill, 17 Kan. 360 ; Voss v. School District, 18 Kan. 471 ; 30 Cyc. 40.

Frost v. Blockwood

408 P.2d 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1965

In this connection, see Bates v. Hanks, 262 Ky. 556 , 90 S.W.2d 743 ; Brown v. Crossmann, 204 N.Y. 238 , 97 N.E. 526 ; Jackson v. … Guy, 165 Old. 156, 25 P.2d 625 ; and Bailey v. Brown, 166 Okl. 5 , 25 P.2d 1088 .

Opinion No. 77-191 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 1977

Haskell v. Houston, 21 Okl. 782 , 79 P. 92 (1908). Moreover, nothing appears in the Constitution which would remove the Governor from the rule laid down in Shaw v. … The decision in Russell Petroleum Company v. Walker, 162 Okl. 216 , 19 P.2d 582 (1933), is directly on point.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1989

Article II , Section 3 . ¶ 14 In Bridges v. … Cartwright v.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1992

THE TEST TO DETERMINE WHETHER A PERSON IS A PUBLIC OFFICER WAS ARTICULATED IN OKLAHOMA CITY V. CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, 62 P.2D 94 (OKLA. 1936). … THIS IS THE ONLY DUAL OFFICE EXEMPTION GIVEN TO SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS.

Byrd v. State Ex Rel. Roff

99 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924

Eldridge, supra, and cites the case of Bartlett et al. v. … of education of the town of Eoraker, and that the entire membership of said board was now vacant.

Ishmael v. Andrew

137 P.3d 1271 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 2006

See Brown v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2002 OK CIV APP 107 , 58 P.3d 217 . 6 Whether or not a duty exists depends on the relationship between the parties. Duty of care is a question of law. … Eddy v.

Opinion No. 74-257 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1975

Rather, it vests discretion in the board of education with respect to such use which is to be exercised in accordance with regulations and conditions prescribed by the board. The United States Supreme Court in Ellis v. … In Cannon v.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.

169 Okla. 648 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1934

The county excise board allocated to the municipalities in Custer county for the fiscal year of 1933-34 a levy of 3.5 mills. … This particular provision was declared unconstitutional and void in the case of State v. Morley, 168 Okla. 259 , 34 P. (2d) 258 .

CRB v. State

638 P.2d 1130 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1982

Cooper v. State, 584 P.2d 234 (Okl.Cr. 1978). II. … Brown v. State, 518 P.2d 898 (Okl.Cr. 1974).

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1996

the Review Board to obtain OSBI records. … TXO Production Corporation v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission, 829 P.2d 964 , 968-9 (Okla. 1992). The Legislature expressed its intent in 10 O.S.

Young v. State

29 Okla. Crim. 60 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1925

Zeke stood on the running board of the car. … O’Neal v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 386 , 188 P. 1092 ; Arnold v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 519 , 178 P. 897 ; Litchfield v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 173 , 126 P. 707 , 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 153; Gritts v. State, 6 Okla.

Opinion No. 68-276 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1968

In the case of People v. … And, in the case of the City of Dayton v. Horstman, Ohio Com.

Hobbs v. State

417 P.2d 934 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 31, 1966

See Hurst v. Pitman, 90 Okl.Cr. 329 , 213 P.2d 877 ; Bonsor v. District Court of Cimarron County, Okl.Cr., 303 P.2d 471 ; White v. Brown, Okl.Cr., 349 P.2d 509 ; Auten v. … In the case of Head v. State, Okl.Cr., 388 P.2d 327 ; and in the recent decision of Angel v.

Town of Sentinel v. Riley

171 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1935

Galt v. Galloway, 4 Pet. 332 . It is hardly necessary to refer to judicial decisions illustrating the rule. They are numerous. A few may be mentioned. De Armond v. Neasmith, 32 Mich. 231 ; Gurney v. … Wallace, 98 Okla. 155 , 224 P. 515 ; Jueschke v. Seeley, 98 Okla. 133 , 224 P. 341 ; Selby Oil, etc., Co. v. Rogers, 94 Okla. 269 , 221 P. 1012 ; Walters v.