Case law

Wilson v. Green

135 N.C. 343 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 11, 1904

Stanly v. Supervisors, 121 U. S., 535 ; Hughes v. Kline, 30 Pa., 227 ; Meade v. Haines, 81 Mich., 261 ; Keigwin v. Commissioners, 115 Ill., 347; Railroad v. Brooklyn, 123 N. Y., 375 ; Stewart v. … Maple, 70 Pa., 221 ; Chisholm v. Adams, 71 Tex., 678 ; Bourne v. Boston, 2 Gray, 494 ; Macklot v. Davenport, 17 Iowa, 379 ; Merrill v. Gorham, 6 Cal., 41 ; Meyer v. Rosenblatt, 78 Mo., 495 ; *351 Chapel v.

DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 10, 2022

See Johnson v. … Doe, 713 F.3d at 758 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 319 (4th Cir. 2006)).

Sinodis v. STATE BD. OF ALCOHOLIC CON., MALT BEV. DIV.

258 N.C. 282 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1962

See Morgan v. U.S., 304 U.S. 1 , 82 L. ed. 1129. Similar views are expressed in Fifth Street Pier Corp. v. City of Hoboken, 126 A. 2d 6 , (N.J.), and Mazza v. Cavicchia, 105 A 2d 545 (N.J.). … Board of Education of McDowell County, 227 F 2d 789 ; Carson v. Warlick, 238 F 2d 724 . Reversed.

State v. Brooks

111 N.C. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 1993

The trial judge further found that defendant removed the board and laid it on top of two nylon bags which were in the back floor board behind the driver’s seat. … Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). In applying that principle in Brown v.

Brooks v. Ansco & Associates, Inc.

114 N.C. App. 711 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 17, 1994

Fuel Co., v. … See N.C.G.S. § 95-135(i) (1993) (requiring the Review Board to enter findings of fact “on all the material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record”); see also Coble v.

Abernathy v. . Phifer

84 N.C. 711 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1881

The allowance of a claim by a county board of commissioners is not final and conclusive. Such an allowance is only prima facie evidence of the correctness of the claim. In the case of Commissioners v. … It may be reexamined by the board itself, and on appeal may be examined or disallowed in whole or in part by the court, and it. is error to instruct the jury that the allowance of a claim by the board is an adjudication as

Miller v. Miller

273 N.C. 228 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1968

In Tom Brown Drilling Co. v. Nieman, 418 S.W. 2d 337 (Tex. Civ. App. 1967), and in Brown v. … In the case comment on Brown v. Kendrick, supra, 39 Colo. L.

Parrish v. Hayworth

138 N.C. App. 637 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2000

See Williams v. Board of Education, 284 N.C. 588, 598 , 201 S.E.2d 889, 896 (1974) (summary judgment inappropriate when genuine issue of material fact exists). … Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428 , 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989) (“If the granting of summary judgment can be sustained on any grounds, it should be affirmed on appeal.”).

State v. Chestnut

255 N.C. App. 772 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2017

STATE V. … Reaves (COA16-1311); State v. Bowens (COA16-1312); State v. Owens (COA16-1313); and State v. Mercer (COA16-1314).

Pack v. . Auman

220 N.C. 704 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1942

Mills v. Moore, 219 N. C., 25 , 12 S. E. (2d), 661 , and cases there cited. … Henry v. R. R., ante, 277; Austin v. R. R., 197 N. C., 319 .” See, also, Mills v. Moore, supra.

State v. Staten

271 N.C. 600 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1967

G.S. 15-4.1; G.S. 15-180; G.S. 15-221; S. v. Roux, 263 N.C. 149 , 139 S.E. 2d 189 ; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 ; 9 L. Ed. 2d 811 , reh. den. 373 U.S. 905 , 10 L. Ed. 2d 200 ; Griffin v. … About that time Jesse Earl Brown and June Lindsey were coming up from McDowell Street. He asked Jesse Earl Brown where' his sister was.

State v. Hernandez

360 N.C. 539 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 2006

North Carolina Ass'n of Educators, Inc. v. State

368 N.C. 777 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2016

In Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U.S. 319 , 57 S. Ct. 483 , 81 L. … Bd. of Educ. v.

Baxter v. Poe

42 N.C. App. 404 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 31, 1979

In addressing these contentions, we rely in large measure on the opinion of this Court by Judge (now Chief Judge) Morris in Thompson v. Board of Education, 31 N.C. … Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474 , 95 L.Ed. 456 , 71 S.Ct. 456 (1951); Underwood v.

Bunch v. Commissioners of Randolph County

159 N.C. 335 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1912

of Trustees v. … C., 383 ; Crocker v. Moore, 140 N. C., 429 ; Tate v. Commissioners, 122 N.

State v. Crutchfield

5 N.C. App. 586 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 13, 1969

State v. Phillip, 261 N.C. 263 , 134 S.E. 2d 386 ; State v. Lane, 258 N.C. 349 , 128 S.E. 2d 389 . … In State v.

State v. White

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2026

In Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50 (1979), the U.S. … Defendant concedes that the checkpoint “advances the public interest” under Brown’s first prong, Brown, 443 U.S. - 19 -  STATE V.

McNair v. . Cooper

174 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1917

Brown, J. … Lee v. McKoy, 118 N. C., 518 ; Byrd v. Byrd, 117 N. C., *568 523; Smith v. Brown, 99 N. C., 377 .” To tbe same effect are: Tremble v. Jones, 7 N. C., 579 ; Long v. Oxford, 108 N. C., 280 ; Tilley v. Brown, 112 N.

State v. Hoyle

325 N.C. 232 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1989

Brown: Objection. COURT: Overruled. Q: Did he ever tell you on that occasion or the next day that Terry Kicinski had done anything at all to him? MRS. Brown: Objection. COURT: Sustained. … In State v.

Canadian American Ass'n of Professional Baseball, Ltd. v. Rapidz

213 N.C. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2011

Capps v. Virrey, 184 N.C. App. 267, 272 , 645 S.E.2d 825, 829 (2007). … Our conclusion is in accord with Parke Construction Co. v.