Case law

Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart

445 F. Supp. 2d 882 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 5, 2006

Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 572-73 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975) (quoting Bd. of Regents v. … Compare, e.g., Killion v. Franklin Reg’l Sch.

La Southaphanh v. Tennessee Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 14, 2022

Arnold v. Tenn. Bd. of Paroles, 956 S.W.2d 478, 480 (Tenn. 1997); Powell v. Parole Eligibility Rev. Bd., 879 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). “The intrinsic correctness of the Board’s decision is not reviewable.” … V. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the Tennessee Board of Parole.

State v. Brock

327 S.W.3d 645 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 29, 2009

In State *682 v. Huddleston, 924 S.W.2d 666 (Tenn.1996), our supreme court adopted the factors set out in Brown v. … Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. at 603-604 , 95 S.Ct. at 2261-2262 , State v. Chandler, 547 S.W.2d 918, 920 (Tenn.1977). Id. (citations omitted).

Ready Mix, USA, LLC v. Jefferson County, Tennessee

380 S.W.3d 52 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2012

V. … Enters. v.

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. XAVION LYNDON UNDERWOOD

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 18, 2013

State v. Dorantes, 331 S.W.3d 370, 379 (Tenn. 2011); State v. Brown, 551 S.W.2d 329, 331 (Tenn. 1977). … State v. Bland, 958 S.W.2d 651, 659 (Tenn. 1997); State v. Pruett, 788 S.W.2d 559, 561 (Tenn. 1990).

Lee v. Melson

54 Tenn. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 10, 1964

J Among the cases cited is Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. … Brown, 132 Tenn. 294 , 177 S.W. 1158 , L.R.A.1915F, 723; Securities Inv. Co. v. White, 19 Tenn.App. 540 , and cases cited p. 556, 91 S.W.(2d) 581 , on the practice of limiting issues on remand.

Harrison v. Seay

856 F. Supp. 1275 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 24, 1994

See Cleavinger v. Saxner, 474 U.S. 193 , 106 S.Ct. 496 , 88 L.Ed.2d 507 (1985) (disciplinary board members protected by qualified immunity); Superintendent v. … A written record that complies with Superintendent v. Hill necessarily complies with Wolff. Hudson v. Edmonson, 848 F.2d at 688 . Plaintiffs contention that the board’s findings violated Hill is meritless.

Sanders, Sarah v. Regis Corp., dba SmartStyle

2015 TN WC 110 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 1, 2015

.: 2015-06-0017 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 2292-2015 REGIS CORP., D/B/A SMARTSTYLE, ) Employer, … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review

State of Tennessee v. Ambreia Washington

Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 8, 2025

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 738 (1983). … Brown, 460 U.S. at 738 (quoting Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176 (1949)).

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Schriver

541 S.W.2d 799 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 27, 1976

In Palmer v. … Palmer v. Love, supra; Cloud Cotton Company v. White, supra.

Peeler v. Luther

175 Tenn. 454 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1940

In his opinion in Trust Company v. … Doud v. Wisconsin, etc., Ry. Co., 65 Wis., 108 , 25 N. W., 533 , 56 Am. Rep., 620 ; Franey v. Warner, 96 Wis., 222 , 71 N. W., 81 ; Cunningham v. Wechselberg, 105 Wis., 359 , 81 N. W., 414 ; Land, etc., Lumber Co. v.

Mark Percy v. Dept of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 22, 2002

Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997). We must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and we must resolve all inferences in the non-moving party’s favor. Godfrey v. … Rampy v. ICI Acrylics, Inc., 898 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). We will, however, give effect to the substance, rather than the form or terminology, of their papers. Brown v.

Smartt v. Fleming

481 S.W.2d 774 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 25, 1972

Therefore, under the provisions of T.C.A. 20-921, the Board of Education waived the right to rely upon the defense of governmental immunity. See Creekmore v. Woodard (1950), 192 Tenn. 280 , 241 S.W.2d 397 and Roberts v. … Co. v. Woodward (1928), 7 Tenn.App. 394 . In Klein v.

Emberton v. Board of Trustees of Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 572 Pension Fund

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 1, 2022

Directv, Inc. v. Treesh, 487 F.3d 471, 476 (6th Cir. 2007); Inge v. Rock Fin. Corp., 281 F.3d 613, 619 (6th Cir. 2002). … LLC v. Med. Mut. of Ohio, 601 F.3d 505, 522 (6th Cir. 2010) (citing Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 266 (6th Cir. 1988)); see also LifeCare Mgmt. Servs. LLC v. Ins. Mgmt.

Hamilton County v. Bryant

175 Tenn. 123 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1939

Const., art. 11, sec. 8; Rogers v. Butler, 170 Tenn., 125 , 92 S. W. (2d), 414 ; Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Marshall County, 161 Tenn., 236 , 30 S. W. (2d), 268 ; Union County v. Toliver, 159 Tenn., 699 , 22 S. … Rogers v. Butler, supra, and State ex rel. Bise v. Knox County, supra.

Kenneth W. Taylor v. Lawrence County, Tennessee Election Commission

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 23, 2011

TAYLOR v. LAWRENCE COUNTY, TENNESSEE ELECTION COMMISSION ET AL. … Gleason v. Gleason, 164 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

Robert P. Hoover and wife, Donna D. Hoover v. Metropolitan Board of Housing Appeals of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 2, 1996

The decision of the Board will not be disturbed unless it can be shown to be beyond its jurisdiction or not supported by material evidence in the record. Huddleston v. … McCallen v. City of Memphis, Tenn. 1990, 786 S.W.2d 633.

STEELE, JEFFREY v. DREAMLINER LUXURY COACHES, LLC

2026 TN WC 60 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 6, 2026

The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

Copas v. Copas

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 27, 1998

Brown v. Brown, 847 S.W.2d 496, 499 (Tenn. 1993). As the instant case demonstrates, the UCCJA has not always had its intended effect. … * * * V. Analysis In the landmark case of Brown v.

R. E. Sharp, Jr. v. Campbell Co. Bd. of Education & Campbell Co., TN

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 31, 2000

Summit Hill Associates v. Knoxville Utilities Board, 667 S.W.2d 91, 96 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). The record before us in this matter is sparse. … Wilson v. Hafley, 189 Tenn. 598, 226 S.W.2d 308 (1949); McDonald v. Onoh, 772 S.W.2d 913 (Tenn. Ct. App.1989); Irvin v. City of Clarksville, 767 S.W.2d 649 (Tenn. Ct. App.1988); Gotten v.