Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.55s

  • STEPHANIE C. ARTIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    135 A.3d 334 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2016

    Brown challenging several notices of proposed infractions against her and alleging that Brown violated other employee rights regulations. 3 On November 15, 2010, appellant … Hedges v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Price v. Greenspan

    374 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2005

    Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984)) (per curiam). … See Stevens v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Local Union No. 103, International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

    535 F.2d 87 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1976

    It is clear enough that the Board was— and is — unhappy with this court’s opinion in Local No. 150 v. … Union No. 57 v.

    Reversed on other grounds by National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, 434 U.S. 335 (1978)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Chavez v. Compass Group Inc

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2025

    Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (per curiam)). III. … “‘[I]f an injury is within the Act's coverage, an employee (or representative) may only pursue a claim before the Benefits Review Board,’ and may not pursue such a claim in court.” Carson v. Sim, 778 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. DOJ

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2009

    Davis v. Dep’t of Justice, 460 F.3d 92, 105 (D.C. Cir. 2006). … See Brown v. Sec’y of Army, 78 F.3d 645, 647 (D.C. Cir. 4 1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sampson v. Department of the Army

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2024

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … initiate the proceeding covered by the limitations period,” which for a service member’s claim for correction of records “begins when the applicant fulfills all prerequisites to bringing an application before the Correction Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matter of Wild

    361 A.2d 182 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1976

    See District of Columbia Bar v. Kleindienst, D.C.App., 345 A.2d 146 (1975). . Findings and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, p. 6. . … Findings and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, p. 3. . Brief of Respondent, pp. 5-6. . Findings and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, p. 4. . District of Columbia Bar v. Kleindienst, supra at 148. .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Children's Hospital of District of Columbia v. Adkins

    284 F. 613 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1922

    See Wilson v. New, 243 U. S. 332, 345, 346 ; Ft. Smith & Western R. R. Co. v. Mills, 253 U. S. 206 . … As the court said, in Truax v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, Afl-Cio, Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, M. Lowenstein Corporation, Intervenor. M. Lowenstein Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, Afl-Cio, Clc, Intervenor

    736 F.2d 1559 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1984

    P 11,092 AMALGAMATED CLOTHING AND TEXTILE WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, M. Lowenstein Corporation, Intervenor. M. LOWENSTEIN CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. … See Boire v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • International Union, Security, Police & Fire Professionals of America v. Faye

    828 F.3d 969 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 2016

    In Arbaugh v. … See District of Columbia Nurses Ass’n v. Brown, No. 15-203, 153 F.Supp.3d 1, 1-2 , 2016 WL 29252, at *1-2 (D.D.C. Jan. 4, 2016) (reaching the same result).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl--Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Jimmy-Richard Co., Inc.,intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Jimmy--Richard Company, Inc., Amalgamated Clothing Workers Ofamerica, Intervenor

    527 F.2d 803 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 13, 1976

    P 11,169 AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL--CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Jimmy-Richard Co., Inc.,Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • William J. Davis, Inc. v. Slade

    271 A.2d 412 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1970

    Their cause failed, however, since the lease was admittedly void under our decision in Brown v. Southall Realty Co., D.C.App., 237 A.2d 834 (1968). … v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Robert P. Smith v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense

    513 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 1975

    See also Williams v. Robinson, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 204 , 432 F.2d 637, 642 (1970). This rule is not iron-clad. See Williams v. Robinson, supra, at 642 n. 17; Brown v. … Schneider v. Smith, 390 U.S. 17 , 88 S.Ct. 682 , 19 L.Ed.2d 799 (1968); Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Harmon v.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Verso Corp. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n

    898 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2018

    Power Comm’n v. Sierra Pac. … Comm’n v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • In Re Challenge to Nominating Petition of Haworth

    258 A.2d 447 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1969

    We cannot infer, in view of the fact that Congress provided judicial review of Board action, that it intended to permit the Board to finally decide such questions. Abbott Laboratories v. … No. 9 v. Wisconsin Employment R.B., 32 Wis.2d 478, 479 , 151 N.W.2d 84, 85 (1967); Koehn v. State Board of Equalization, 166 Cal.App.2d 109, 114 , 333 P.2d 125, 131 (Dist.Ct.App. 1958).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Matter of Alexander

    466 A.2d 447 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1983

    See Vann v. District of Columbia Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, 441 A.2d 246 (D.C.1982). 4 . … People v. Betillo, 53 Misc.2d 540, 546 , 279 N.Y.S.2d 444, 453 (1967) (citing cases); see also Koehler v. Wales, 16 Wash.App. 304, 307 , 556 P.2d 233, 236 (1976).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Becker v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

    518 A.2d 93 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1986

    D.C.Code § l-1510(a) (1981); LCP, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 499 A.2d 897, 903 (D.C.1985). … Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 433 A.2d 1114, 1116 (D.C.1981).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Said v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2019

    See Brown v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 254 F.3d 654, 661 (7th Cir. 2001). … Brown, 254 F.3d at 658 (quoting Hawaiian Airlines, 512 U.S. at 261–62).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Richardson

    692 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1997

    See Barry v. … Overmyer Co. v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Department of Health and Human Services

    763 F.2d 1441 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1985

    V).” Bell v. … See Block v. Community Nutrition Institute, - U.S. -, -, 104 S.Ct. 2450, 2454 , 81 L.Ed.2d 270 (1984); Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 317-18 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1725-26 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979).

    Disagreed with by Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Departmental Grant Appeals Board of United States Department of Health & Human Services, 815 F.2d 778 (1987)Cited 185 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.