Case law

E. Cent. Baldwin Cnty. Water v. Town of Summerdale (Ex parte Town of Summerdale)

252 So. 3d 111 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 13, 2016

Brown, Stagner, Richardson, Inc. , 873 So.2d 220 , 223 (Ala.2003) )). In contrast, the Court of Civil Appeals in this case relied upon Town of Cedar Bluff v. … [Inc. v.

Payne v. Department of Industrial Relations

423 So. 2d 231 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Aug 25, 1982

See Rogers v. Smith , 287 Ala. 118 , 248 So.2d 713 (1971); Farrell v. Farrell , 243 Ala. 389 , 10 So.2d 153 (1942); Louisville N.R. Co. v. Tally , 203 Ala. 370 , 83 So. 114 (1919). … City of Huntsville v. Miller, supra.

Duke v. Wimberly

245 Ala. 639 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 22, 1944

Kidd v. Borum, 181 Ala. 144, 161 , 61 So. 100 , 106 Ann.Cas. 1915C, 1226; Kidd v. Browne, 200 Ala. *641 299, 303(8), 76 So. 65 ; Long, Adm’r, v. Parmer, 81 Ala. 384, 388 , 1 So. 900 . … J., and BROWN and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur

Higginbotham v. State

54 Ala. App. 633 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 4, 1975

In Shields v. … McMullen v. State, 53 Ala. 531 ; Ludlum v. State, 13 Ala.App. 278 , 69 So. 255 . In Reed v.

King v. S.R. Smith, Inc.

578 So. 2d 1285 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 26, 1991

Woodham v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co. , 349 So.2d 1110 (Ala. 1977); Shades Ridge Holding Co. v. Cobbs, Allen Hall Mortg. Co. , 390 So.2d 601 (Ala. 1980); Fulton v. Advertiser Co. , 388 So.2d 533 (Ala. 1980)." Schoen v. … Entrekin v. Atlantic Richfield Co. , 519 So.2d 447 (Ala. 1987). See Rivers v. Stihl, Inc. , 434 So.2d 766 (Ala. 1983); Ford Motor Co. v. Rodgers , *Page 1288 337 So.2d 736 (Ala. 1976). S.R.

Simmons v. State

16 Ala. App. 645 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1919

BROWN, P. … Brown v. State, 108 Ala. 18 , 18 South. 811 ; Hall v. State, 53 Ala. 463 ; Fortner v. State, 12 Ala. App. 179 , 67 South. 720 . There is no error in the record. Affirmed. 1 Ante, p. 390.

Ex Parte Globe Life Insurance Co. of Alabama

41 Ala. App. 82 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1960

Ex parte Walker, 54 Ala. 577 ; Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Lockerd, 202 Ala. 330 , 80 So. 412 ; McCord v. Harrison & Stringer, 207 Ala. 480 , 93 So. 428 ; Brown v. Brown, 213 Ala. 339 , 105 So. 171 . … Finance Co., 251 Ala. 665 , 38 So.2d 560 ; McDavid v. United Mercantile Agencies, 248 Ala. 297 , 27 So.2d 499 ; Brown v. Brown, 213 Ala. 339 , 105 So. 171 . See Skelton v. Weaver, 266 Ala. 335 , 96 So.2d 288 .”

Menefee v. City of Huntsville Board of Education

District Court, N.D. Alabama · Dec 30, 2019

) Case No.: 5:18-cv-1481-LCB ) CITY OF HUNTSVILLE BOARD OF ) EDUCATION … Love v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 865 F.3d 1322, 1325 (11th Cir. 2017) (holding that a joint stipulation of dismissal is “self-executing” and dismisses the case upon proper filing)).

Carlisle v. State

533 So. 2d 645 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Sep 20, 1988

of the presence of marijuana in the brown bag in question. … He then placed the cocaine in a sealed brown manila envelope.

Town of Capitol Heights v. Steiner

211 Ala. 640 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 26, 1924

The case from the Supreme Court of the United States, that is cited by the author is Memphis v. Brown, 20 Wall. 289 , 22 L. … Co. v.

Browning v. State

465 So. 2d 1208 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Nov 27, 1984

BROWNING: Yes, sir'" (RT-36). It is clear from the petitioner's testimony at trial that he pled guilty knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. … Strickland v. Washington , ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 ; Duncan v. State , 461 So.2d 906 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984); Daniel v. State , 459 So.2d 948 (Ala. 1984); Haynes v.

Gee v. Gee

249 Ala. 642 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 20, 1947

Bryan v. Bryan, 34 Ala. 516, 519-522 ; Anonymous, 55 Ala. 428 ; Brown v. Brown, 178 Ala. 121 , 59 So. 48 ; Spafford v. Spafford, 199 Ala. 300 , 74 So. 358 , L.R.A.1917D, 773.” … J„ and BROWN and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

City of Birmingham v. Personnel Bd.

464 So. 2d 100 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Dec 12, 1984

In City of Bessemer v. Personnel Board of Jefferson County , 420 So.2d 6 (Ala. 1982), rule 8.6 of the board was determined to be valid. … "We have spoken to the conflict between a city department and a county personnel board previously. In Hudson v.

Eady v. State

495 So. 2d 1161 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Sep 9, 1986

Valenza went back to the point where the brown sack had been thrown from the vehicle and recovered the brown sack and a coin purse from the side of the roadway. … See, English v. State , 457 So.2d 458 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984) and cases cited therein.

City of Montgomery v. Zgouvas

953 So. 2d 434 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Sep 29, 2006

State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow Drive , 740 So.2d 1025 , 1027 (Ala. 1999) (quoting Romer v. Board of County Comm'rs of the County of Pueblo , 956 P.2d 566 , 581 (Colo. 1998)(Kourlis, J., dissenting)). … Board of Airport Comm'rs of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc. , 482 U.S. 569 , 107 S.Ct. 2568 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987).

Allison v. Holman

216 F. Supp. 69 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 29, 1963

Sain, the leading case on this point was Brown v. Allen. … Allen, supra, and applied the “vital flaw” test as applied in Brown v. Allen and also in Rogers v.

Ex Parte Greater Mobile-Wash. County Mental

940 So. 2d 990 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 3, 2006

Creation and Organization of the Board As explained in Williams v. … In Deal v.

Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. v. Bd. of Adjust.

470 So. 2d 1234 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 16, 1985

Alford v. City of Gadsden , 349 So.2d 1132 (Ala. 1977); Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County v. Hudgens , 274 Ala. 647 , 151 So.2d 247 (1963). … Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Warren , 366 So.2d 1125 (Ala. 1979).

Weatherwax v. Heflin

244 Ala. 210 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 11, 1943

Wadsworth v. Hodge, 88 Ala. [500], 506, 7 So. 194 ; Hawkins Lumber Company v. Brown, 100 Ala. 217 , 114 So. 110 ; Hanchey v. Powell, 171 Ala. 597 , 55 So. 97 .” … BROWN and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

Averyt v. Doyle

456 So. 2d 1096 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Aug 29, 1984

Such hearings on appeal are de novo, and the Board may rescind, modify, alter or affirm the penalty imposed by the City. Rule 14.7 of the Personnel Board of Mobile County; City of Mobile v. … Furthermore, in Bush v.