Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
9.24s
Sanders, Sarah v. Regis Corp., dba SmartStyle
2015 TN WC 110 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 1, 2015
.: 2015-06-0017 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 2292-2015 REGIS CORP., D/B/A SMARTSTYLE, ) Employer, … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 16, 1999
United States v. Quezada, 754 F.2d 1190, 1194 (5th Cir. 1985), cited in United States v. Brown, 9 F.3d 907, 911 (11th Cir. 1993); see United States v. Grady, 544 F.2d 598, 604 (2d Cir. 1976). … Brown, 9 F.3d at 911-12.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMerrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Schriver
541 S.W.2d 799 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 27, 1976
In Palmer v. … Palmer v. Love, supra; Cloud Cotton Company v. White, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFranklin v. Shelby County Schools
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 15, 2021
The Court finds that, given that a plaintiff’s burden at the prima facie stage is “minimal,” Brown v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov’t, 483 F. App’x 221, 225 (6th Cir. 2012) (citing EEOC v. … Yazdian, 793 F.3d at 645 (quoting Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1313 (6th Cir. 1989)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHarris, Eboni v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center
2023 TN WC App. 21 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 25, 2023
Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015). … Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMark Percy v. Dept of Correction
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 22, 2002
Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997). We must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and we must resolve all inferences in the non-moving party’s favor. Godfrey v. … Rampy v. ICI Acrylics, Inc., 898 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). We will, however, give effect to the substance, rather than the form or terminology, of their papers. Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished175 Tenn. 123 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1939
Const., art. 11, sec. 8; Rogers v. Butler, 170 Tenn., 125 , 92 S. W. (2d), 414 ; Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Marshall County, 161 Tenn., 236 , 30 S. W. (2d), 268 ; Union County v. Toliver, 159 Tenn., 699 , 22 S. … Rogers v. Butler, supra, and State ex rel. Bise v. Knox County, supra.
Cited 10 timesPublished50 Tenn. 682 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1871
In the case of Marr v. … It has also been held, in the case of Shelby County v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUniversity of the South v. Franklin County
506 S.W.2d 779 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 27, 1973
State Board of Equalization (1966), 219 Tenn. 123 , 407 S.W.2d 443 . In State v. … In State ex rel. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMitchell v. Automobile Sales Co.
161 Tenn. 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 24, 1930
, possession was acquired by the seller from Brown, which fact was unknown to Mitchell until after the automobile had been advertised and sold. … The seller, in Lieberman v.
Cited 13 timesPublished87 Tenn. 60 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1888
Acts of 1875, page 248; M. & V. Code, Sec. 1858. … Horner v. Henning, 98 U. S., 231 . It is no answer to say that the old debt may have been paid off by the creation of a new one.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 27, 1998
Brown v. Brown, 847 S.W.2d 496, 499 (Tenn. 1993). As the instant case demonstrates, the UCCJA has not always had its intended effect. … * * * V. Analysis In the landmark case of Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilson, Scott v. American Paper & Twine Co.
2022 TN WC 38 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 2, 2022
Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board recently addressed this question in Braden v. Mohawk Indus. Inc., 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 11 (Mar. 1, 2022).
Cited 0 timesPublishedRomona D. Gore v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water, Division of the City of Memphis
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 14, 2009
GORE, ET AL. v. … In sum, the Board of Review’s finding is conclusive unless there is not substantial and material evidence to support its findings. Ford v. Traughber, 813 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991)(citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 24, 1997
The Tennessee Supreme Court has addressed the issues of premeditation and deliberation in State v. Brown, 836 S.W .2d 530 (Tenn. 1992), and in State -8- v. … Unlike Brown, repeated shots were not integral to proving the case at bar. In Brown, the Defendant beat his three-year-old son to death. Brown, 836 S.W.2d at 534.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKelley v. Apria Healthcare, LLC
232 F. Supp. 3d 983 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 3, 2017
Apria’s argument relies on Brown v. Sun Healthcar e Group, Inc., 476 F.Supp.2d 848 (E.D. Tenn. 2007) (Varían, C.J.), and Conley v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). … Brown, 476 F.Supp.2d at 851-52 ; Conley, 236 *1003 S.W.3d at 733 . Both cases, however, were limited to federal nursing-home regulations. Further, Brown and Conley were medical malpractice actions.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRobert Starbuck Newsom a/k/a Robby Starbuck v. Tennessee Republican Party
Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 10, 2022
Id. at 394-95 (citing Cole v. Dych, 535 S.W.2d 315, 322 (Tenn. 1976); King v. Elrod, 268 S.W.2d 103, 106 (Tenn. 1954)). … (citing State v. Lewis, 958 S.W.2d 736, 739 (Tenn. 1997)); State v.
Cited 0 timesPublished59 Tenn. 210 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1873
This view was repeated in the case of The State v. The Bank of East Tennessee, 5 Sneed, 573 , and again in Ward v. … The case of The State v. E. F. Hall, 3 Col., 256 , was decided upon the same principle.
Cited 0 timesPublished54 Tenn. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 10, 1964
J Among the cases cited is Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. … Brown, 132 Tenn. 294 , 177 S.W. 1158 , L.R.A.1915F, 723; Securities Inv. Co. v. White, 19 Tenn.App. 540 , and cases cited p. 556, 91 S.W.(2d) 581 , on the practice of limiting issues on remand.
Cited 7 timesPublished477 S.W.2d 754 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 22, 1971
Shepard v. Henderson, supra; State ex rel. Wyatt v. Henderson, Tenn.Cr.App., 453 S.W.2d 434 ; Adams v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 841 ; Beaty v. Neil, Tenn.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 844 ; Parker v. … Gann v. Henderson, 221 Tenn. 209 , 425 S.W.2d 616 ; State ex rel. Johnson v. Heer, 219 Tenn. 604 , 412 S.W.2d 218 ; Carvin v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 681 ; Beaty v. Neil, supra. In Richmond v.
Cited 62 timesPublished
Ask Donna