Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

9.24s

  • Sanders, Sarah v. Regis Corp., dba SmartStyle

    2015 TN WC 110 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 1, 2015

    .: 2015-06-0017 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 2292-2015 REGIS CORP., D/B/A SMARTSTYLE, ) Employer, … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Mark J. Turner

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 16, 1999

    United States v. Quezada, 754 F.2d 1190, 1194 (5th Cir. 1985), cited in United States v. Brown, 9 F.3d 907, 911 (11th Cir. 1993); see United States v. Grady, 544 F.2d 598, 604 (2d Cir. 1976). … Brown, 9 F.3d at 911-12.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Schriver

    541 S.W.2d 799 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 27, 1976

    In Palmer v. … Palmer v. Love, supra; Cloud Cotton Company v. White, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Franklin v. Shelby County Schools

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 15, 2021

    The Court finds that, given that a plaintiff’s burden at the prima facie stage is “minimal,” Brown v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov’t, 483 F. App’x 221, 225 (6th Cir. 2012) (citing EEOC v. … Yazdian, 793 F.3d at 645 (quoting Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1313 (6th Cir. 1989)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Harris, Eboni v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    2023 TN WC App. 21 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 25, 2023

    Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015). … Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mark Percy v. Dept of Correction

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 22, 2002

    Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997). We must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and we must resolve all inferences in the non-moving party’s favor. Godfrey v. … Rampy v. ICI Acrylics, Inc., 898 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). We will, however, give effect to the substance, rather than the form or terminology, of their papers. Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hamilton County v. Bryant

    175 Tenn. 123 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1939

    Const., art. 11, sec. 8; Rogers v. Butler, 170 Tenn., 125 , 92 S. W. (2d), 414 ; Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Marshall County, 161 Tenn., 236 , 30 S. W. (2d), 268 ; Union County v. Toliver, 159 Tenn., 699 , 22 S. … Rogers v. Butler, supra, and State ex rel. Bise v. Knox County, supra.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Pope v. Phifer

    50 Tenn. 682 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1871

    In the case of Marr v. … It has also been held, in the case of Shelby County v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • University of the South v. Franklin County

    506 S.W.2d 779 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 27, 1973

    State Board of Equalization (1966), 219 Tenn. 123 , 407 S.W.2d 443 . In State v. … In State ex rel. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Automobile Sales Co.

    161 Tenn. 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 24, 1930

    , possession was acquired by the seller from Brown, which fact was unknown to Mitchell until after the automobile had been advertised and sold. … The seller, in Lieberman v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Allison v. Coal Co.

    87 Tenn. 60 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1888

    Acts of 1875, page 248; M. & V. Code, Sec. 1858. … Horner v. Henning, 98 U. S., 231 . It is no answer to say that the old debt may have been paid off by the creation of a new one.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Copas v. Copas

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 27, 1998

    Brown v. Brown, 847 S.W.2d 496, 499 (Tenn. 1993). As the instant case demonstrates, the UCCJA has not always had its intended effect. … * * * V. Analysis In the landmark case of Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilson, Scott v. American Paper & Twine Co.

    2022 TN WC 38 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 2, 2022

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board recently addressed this question in Braden v. Mohawk Indus. Inc., 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 11 (Mar. 1, 2022).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Romona D. Gore v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water, Division of the City of Memphis

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 14, 2009

    GORE, ET AL. v. … In sum, the Board of Review’s finding is conclusive unless there is not substantial and material evidence to support its findings. Ford v. Traughber, 813 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991)(citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Callahan

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 24, 1997

    The Tennessee Supreme Court has addressed the issues of premeditation and deliberation in State v. Brown, 836 S.W .2d 530 (Tenn. 1992), and in State -8- v. … Unlike Brown, repeated shots were not integral to proving the case at bar. In Brown, the Defendant beat his three-year-old son to death. Brown, 836 S.W.2d at 534.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kelley v. Apria Healthcare, LLC

    232 F. Supp. 3d 983 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 3, 2017

    Apria’s argument relies on Brown v. Sun Healthcar e Group, Inc., 476 F.Supp.2d 848 (E.D. Tenn. 2007) (Varían, C.J.), and Conley v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). … Brown, 476 F.Supp.2d at 851-52 ; Conley, 236 *1003 S.W.3d at 733 . Both cases, however, were limited to federal nursing-home regulations. Further, Brown and Conley were medical malpractice actions.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Robert Starbuck Newsom a/k/a Robby Starbuck v. Tennessee Republican Party

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 10, 2022

    Id. at 394-95 (citing Cole v. Dych, 535 S.W.2d 315, 322 (Tenn. 1976); King v. Elrod, 268 S.W.2d 103, 106 (Tenn. 1954)). … (citing State v. Lewis, 958 S.W.2d 736, 739 (Tenn. 1997)); State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mayor of Memphis v. Halsey

    59 Tenn. 210 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1873

    This view was repeated in the case of The State v. The Bank of East Tennessee, 5 Sneed, 573 , and again in Ward v. … The case of The State v. E. F. Hall, 3 Col., 256 , was decided upon the same principle.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Melson

    54 Tenn. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 10, 1964

    J Among the cases cited is Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. … Brown, 132 Tenn. 294 , 177 S.W. 1158 , L.R.A.1915F, 723; Securities Inv. Co. v. White, 19 Tenn.App. 540 , and cases cited p. 556, 91 S.W.(2d) 581 , on the practice of limiting issues on remand.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bratton v. State

    477 S.W.2d 754 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 22, 1971

    Shepard v. Henderson, supra; State ex rel. Wyatt v. Henderson, Tenn.Cr.App., 453 S.W.2d 434 ; Adams v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 841 ; Beaty v. Neil, Tenn.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 844 ; Parker v. … Gann v. Henderson, 221 Tenn. 209 , 425 S.W.2d 616 ; State ex rel. Johnson v. Heer, 219 Tenn. 604 , 412 S.W.2d 218 ; Carvin v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 681 ; Beaty v. Neil, supra. In Richmond v.

    Cited 62 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.