Case law

Fraternal Order of Police No. 165 v. City of Choctaw

933 P.2d 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1997

The arbitration board heard the remaining issues on September 20, 1994 and rendered its decision on October 14, 1994. The board accepted the “last best offer” of the FOP. … We do not find persuasive the cities’ reliance on City of Ardmore v. Excise Board, 155 Okla. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932).

St. Louis S. F. R. v. Travelers' Corp. of Oklahoma

47 Okla. 374 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1915

Co. v. State et al., 23 Okla. 210 , 100 Pac. 11 , 21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 908; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. State et al., 23 Okla. 510 , 101 Pac. 262 ; Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. … Co. v. State et al., 24 Okla. 370 , 103 Pac. 617 , 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 393; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Newell et al., 25 Okla. 502 , 106 Pac. 818 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v.

Consolidated School District No. 41 v. Dacus

189 Okla. 400 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1941

Common School District No. 49 v. Wolfe, 94 Okla. 87 , 221 P. 42 ; School District No. 65 of Payne County v. Board of Commissioners of Payne County, 148 Okla. 5 , 296 P. 483 ; School District No. 9 of Tulsa County v. … Musick v. State ex rel. Miles, supra; Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, supra.

McClellan v. Ficklen

54 Okla. 745 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 1916

error alleges in his petition that he was the owner of the real estate involved herein at the time of its assessment in the year of 1911; that it was properly assessed for said year, and its value equalized by the proper boards … Upon the authority of Carrico et al. v. Crocker et al., 38 Okla. 440 , 133 Pac. 181 , and the cases, therein cited, and also of Thompson et al. v. Brady et al., 42 Okla. 807 , 143 Pac. 6 , Rumph, Treas., v.

CRB v. State

638 P.2d 1130 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1982

Cooper v. State, 584 P.2d 234 (Okl.Cr. 1978). II. … Brown v. State, 518 P.2d 898 (Okl.Cr. 1974).

Opinion No. 79-197 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1979

Senate Bill No. 33, provides for the recreation of eight state boards These boards were due to terminate under the Sunset Laws on July 1, 1979. … Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Oklahoma Tax Commission et al., (City of Tulsa et al.) Interveners 212 P.2d 462 (1949) .

Opinion No. 69-178 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 18, 1969

The general rule concerning powers of an administrative agency was expressed in the first paragraph of the syllabus in Boydston v. … board itself."

Opinion No. 74-153 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1975

In Guthrie Daily Leader v. … In Gibson v.

Opinion No. 71-155 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1971

Co. v. Colvert, 100 P.2d 1005 , 1008 (Okl. 1940) stated: "The word employed by the legislature deposit has a definite meaning. . ." and goes on to quote 7 Am. … Having been either designated by statute or appointed by a board of education, a treasurer of a school district is the agent of the school board or board of education.

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 2002

Coll. v. … Dist. v. Wis.

Opinion No. 76-151 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 25, 1976

Hines v. … In Mott v.

Coffey v. Robert McMullan & Son, Inc.

570 P.2d 1152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1977

Department of Highways v. … However, in State Board of Public Affairs v.

Woods v. City of Lawton

64 O.B.A.J. 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1992

The court of appeals reversed citing Board of Trustees v. … The exact question presented in this case has not been before us, although, we did consider in Board of Trustees v.

WEAVER v. DOE

371 P.3d 1170 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 2016

According to the West Virginia Court in Brown ex rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 228 W.Va. 646 , 724 S.E.2d 250, 267 (2011) cert. granted, judgment vacated sub nom. Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. … See also, eg., Preston v.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 1994

For example, see O'Brien v. … In Williams Petroleum Co. v.

Arthur Andersen LLP v. Standard & Poor's Credit

260 F. Supp. 2d 1123 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2003

Zink Co. v. Zink, 241 F.3d 1256, 1259 (10th Cir.2001). … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 , 106 S.Ct. 466 , 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985); Haney v. Addison, 175 F.3d 1217 (10th Cir. 1999); and Talley v. Hesse, 91 F.3d 1411 (10th Cir.1996). February 18, 2003. 1 .

Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 2 of Garfield Cty. v. Beeson

30 Okla. 802 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1911

In Moore v. … See Gilmore v. Fox, 10 Kan. 509 ; Hays v. Hill, 17 Kan. 360 ; Voss v. School District, 18 Kan. 471 ; 30 Cyc. 40.

Frost v. Blockwood

408 P.2d 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1965

In this connection, see Bates v. Hanks, 262 Ky. 556 , 90 S.W.2d 743 ; Brown v. Crossmann, 204 N.Y. 238 , 97 N.E. 526 ; Jackson v. … Guy, 165 Old. 156, 25 P.2d 625 ; and Bailey v. Brown, 166 Okl. 5 , 25 P.2d 1088 .

Opinion No. 77-239 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1977

In the case of Spearman v. … In the case of Rosen v. New York City Teacher's Retirement Board, et al., 115 N.Y.

Opinion No. 77-191 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 1977

Haskell v. Houston, 21 Okl. 782 , 79 P. 92 (1908). Moreover, nothing appears in the Constitution which would remove the Governor from the rule laid down in Shaw v. … The decision in Russell Petroleum Company v. Walker, 162 Okl. 216 , 19 P.2d 582 (1933), is directly on point.