Case law

Shaw v. Esper

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2023

See Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992). A 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss is designed to “test[] the legal sufficiency of a complaint.” Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Rodriguez, 857 F.3d at 906 (“district courts have routinely reviewed those board decisions in the first instance.”); see also, e.g., McKinney v. Wormuth, 5 F.4th 42 (D.C. Cir. 2021); Kidwell v.

Daley v. United States

739 A.2d 814 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1999

owned a pistol; and Johnson saw Brown hand his pistol to Daley. … Hairston v. Gennet, 501 A.2d 1265, 1268 (D.C.1985); Joyner v. Jonathan Woodner Co., 479 A.2d 308, 312 (D.C.1984); Harris v. Akindulureni, 342 A.2d 684, 686-87 (D.C.1975).

Joseph M. Keating v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of California, Ex Rel. California State Water Resources Control Board, Intervenor

927 F.2d 616 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 10, 1991

Control Board. … Dist. v. Andrews, 758 F.2d 508 , 511 (10th Cir.1985); Orleans Audubon Soc’y v.

In Re Micheel

610 A.2d 231 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 19, 1992

See, e.g., Montague v. Henderson, 409 A.2d 627, 628 (D.C.1979). … Montague v. Henderson, supra, 409 A.2d at 628 . .

Annette v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 2014

cv-01560-KBJ-DAR Document 19 Filed 08/07/14 Page 2 of 14 Brown, et al. v. … Case 1:13-cv-01560-KBJ-DAR Document 19 Filed 08/07/14 Page 4 of 14 Brown, et al. v.

White v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.

303 F. Supp. 3d 5 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 2018

(citing Byrd v. District of Columbia, 1991 WL 336038 , *1 (D.D.C. Sept. 12, 1991) ; Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, 359 A.2d 28 , 31 n.4 (D.C. 1976) ); see also Brown v. … Moreover, the Supreme Court ruled in Board of Trustees v.

Smith v. United States

984 A.2d 196 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 2009

See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 795 A.2d 56 , 62 n. 2 (D.C.2002); Littlejohn v. United States, 749 A.2d 1253, 1258 (D.C.2000). … Superior Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 35, like all the Superi- or Court Rules, was enacted by the Board of Judges, not by Congress.

Schwartz v. Chow

867 A.2d 230 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 2005

See Zhou v. Jennifer Mall Restaurant, Inc., 534 A.2d 1268, 1269 (D.C.1987) (“Zhou 7”); Zhou v. Jennifer Mall Restaurant, Inc., 699 A.2d 348, 350 (D.C.1997) (“Zhou II”). … Poire v. Kaplan, 491 A.2d 529, 534 (D.C.1985); see Sargent v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 280 U.S.App.

United States v. Jones

584 F.3d 1083 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 2009

Rollins also could not see what was in the cup or the brown bag. … Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124–25 (2000).

Penello v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

223 F. Supp. 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 1963

B. v. … B. v. Retail Clerks International Association, Local No. 57, D.C., 188 F. Supp. 847, 852 ; Penello for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v.

Bannum, Inc. v. Citizens for a Safe Ward Five, Inc.

383 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2005

See Letter from Carolyn Brown to Michael Johnson (Dec. 11, 2000) (“Johnson Concurrence”), Ex. 7 to Def. Mot. Dism. … Summit Health, Ltd. v. Pinhas, 500 U.S. 322, 325 , 111 S.Ct. 1842 , 114 L.Ed.2d 366 (1991); Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Browning v.

Chavez v. Compass Group Inc

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2025

Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (per curiam)). III. … “‘[I]f an injury is within the Act's coverage, an employee (or representative) may only pursue a claim before the Benefits Review Board,’ and may not pursue such a claim in court.” Carson v. Sim, 778 F.

Bricklayers, Masons and Plasterers International Union of America v. National Labor Relations Board. National Labor Relations Board v. Bricklayers, Stone Masons, Marble Masons, Tile Setters and Terrazzo Workers, Local Union No. 1 of Tennessee

475 F.2d 1316 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 1973

P 13,453 BRICKLAYERS, MASONS AND PLASTERERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … This interpretation of section 10(k) by the Board is entitled to great weight. United States v.

Sampson v. Department of the Army

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2024

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … initiate the proceeding covered by the limitations period,” which for a service member’s claim for correction of records “begins when the applicant fulfills all prerequisites to bringing an application before the Correction Board

International Union, Security, Police & Fire Professionals of America v. Faye

828 F.3d 969 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 2016

In Arbaugh v. … See District of Columbia Nurses Ass’n v. Brown, No. 15-203, 153 F.Supp.3d 1, 1-2 , 2016 WL 29252, at *1-2 (D.D.C. Jan. 4, 2016) (reaching the same result).

Children's Hospital of District of Columbia v. Adkins

284 F. 613 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1922

See Wilson v. New, 243 U. S. 332, 345, 346 ; Ft. Smith & Western R. R. Co. v. Mills, 253 U. S. 206 . … As the court said, in Truax v.

Said v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2019

See Brown v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 254 F.3d 654, 661 (7th Cir. 2001). … Brown, 254 F.3d at 658 (quoting Hawaiian Airlines, 512 U.S. at 261–62).

Davis v. DOJ

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2009

Davis v. Dep’t of Justice, 460 F.3d 92, 105 (D.C. Cir. 2006). … See Brown v. Sec’y of Army, 78 F.3d 645, 647 (D.C. Cir. 4 1996).

Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, Afl-Cio, Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, M. Lowenstein Corporation, Intervenor. M. Lowenstein Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, Afl-Cio, Clc, Intervenor

736 F.2d 1559 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1984

P 11,092 AMALGAMATED CLOTHING AND TEXTILE WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, M. Lowenstein Corporation, Intervenor. M. LOWENSTEIN CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. … See Boire v.

Matter of Shillaire

549 A.2d 336 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1988

Radio Officers v. Labor Board, 347 U.S. 17, 45 , 74 S.Ct. 323, 338 , 98 L.Ed. 455 (1954). … Machinists Local v. Labor Board, 362 U.S. 411 , 416 n. 6, 80 S.Ct. 822 , 826 n. 6, 4 L.Ed.2d 832 (1960).