Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1800

10,000+ results

2.36s

  • Martínez-Rodríguez v. Guevara

    597 F.3d 414 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Mar 1, 2010

    First, they assume that Defendants are protected by qualified immunity rather than absolute immunity. … The qualified immunity doctrine protects federal and state officials from civil liability in the performance of "discretionary functions . . . insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, Board of Trustees

    3 F.3d 1482 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 7, 1993

    Since the contract was ambiguous, the court reasoned, it was not clearly established that the contract created a property interest. This decision reflects a misunderstanding of qualified immunity. … Because the law was clearly established, the qualified immunity doctrine cannot shield the individual capacity defendants from suit.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Jones v. United States of America

    934 F. Supp. 2d 284 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2013

    Qualified Immunity Officer Kadiev asserts the defense of qualified immunity. Qualified immunity is “an immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to liability.” Hunter v. … Qualified immunity shields government officials “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Haggerty v. Texas Southern University

    391 F.3d 653 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 18, 2004

    Jurisdiction over this Appeal “Denial of summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity is immediately appealable to the extent that the question on appeal is whether the undisputed facts amount to a violation of clearly … established law.”

    Cited 185 timesPublished
  • Henry Lyons v. F. Wayne Vaught

    781 F.3d 958 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 24, 2015

    We have jurisdiction over the denial of a motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity, including “whether a particular complaint sufficiently alleges a clearly established violation of law.” Ashcroft v. … established’ for purposes of the . . . qualified immunity standard.”

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Anthony C. Greene v. Jack Barber, Edward Hillyer, Victor Gillis, William Hegarty, and the City of Grand Rapids, Michigan

    310 F.3d 889 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 8, 2002

    Qualified Immunity for the Arrest Mr. … “If no constitutional right would have been violated were the allegations established, there is no necessity for further inquiries concerning qualified immunity.”

    Cited 909 timesPublished
  • McClennon v. Kipke

    821 F. Supp. 2d 1101 · District Court, D. Minnesota · Oct 31, 2011

    Seizing on Chambers, the Individual Defendants argue they are entitled to qualified immunity here because (1) McClennon suffered only de minimis injuries and (2) it was not clearly established on December 20, 2006, that inflicting … to qualified immunity on the excessive-force claim.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Joseph Rome v. Eugene Burden, Michel Cabello, Angela Phillips, and Sareta Davis

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 31, 2002

    Qualified immunity is an affirmative defense. We need only reach this issue if there is a clearly established statutory or constitutional right violated. Rome has not alleged any violation of a statutory right. … Furthermore, as Rome did not establish the predicate constitutional violation, we need not reach the issue of qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rodeman v. Foster

    767 F. Supp. 2d 1176 · District Court, D. Colorado · Mar 16, 2011

    Once defendants asserted qualified immunity, the burden shifted to plaintiff to show the violation of a clearly established right. See Powell v. … no material facts remain in dispute that would defeat his or her claim of qualified immunity.”).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Koch v. Rugg

    221 F.3d 1283 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 11, 2000

    clearly established law." … violate clearly established law.").

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Vázquez v. Surillo-Ruiz

    76 F. Supp. 3d 381 · District Court, D. Puerto Rico · Jan 7, 2015

    Qualified Immunity Individual-capacity Defendants now request permission from the Court to don the protective armor of qualified immunity. … : that individual-capacity Defendants’ alleged conduct violated a “clearly established” constitutional right.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jerry Hollingsworth and Kenneth Anderson v. Kim Hackler, Individually and as Next Friend for C. H., a Minor, and Steve Hackler, Individually and as Next Friend for C. H., a Minor

    Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · Dec 31, 2009

    of qualified immunity shields an official performing discretionary functions from individual liability for civil damages under § 1983 if the official’s “conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … ’s conduct violated a clearly established statutory or constitutional right.18 A right is “clearly established” when its contours are “sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sunn v. City & County of Honolulu

    852 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, D. Hawaii · May 19, 1994

    have believed that their conduct did not violate clearly established law. … Qualified immunity requires that in light of clearly established principles governing the conduct in question, the officer objectively could have believed his conduct was lawful. Anderson v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hampton v. Oktibbeha County Sheriff Department

    480 F.3d 358 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 6, 2007

    establishing that the official’s allegedly wrongful conduct violated clearly established law.” … If the plaintiff fails to state a constitutional claim or if the defendant’s conduct was objectively reasonable under clearly established law, then the government official is entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Aiken v. Nixon

    236 F. Supp. 2d 211 · District Court, N.D. New York · Sep 30, 2002

    Qualified Immunity — General Qualified immunity is available only to defendants in their individual capacities and only on that much of the claims seeking monetary damages. Lewis v. … The Court concludes that he is entitled to qualified immunity on this claim.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Crockett

    District Court, D. Colorado · Aug 3, 2023

    Wang’s conclusion that an inmate’s First Amendment right to a diet conforming to his sincerely held religious beliefs was clearly established since at least 2002; in other words, it is clearly established Tenth Circuit … City of Las Cruces, 584 F.3d 888, 895–902 (10th Cir. 2009) (qualified immunity unavailable at summary judgment where the plaintiff’s version of the facts, if believed, would constitute a violation of a clearly established

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CAREPARTNERS, LLC v. Lashway

    545 F.3d 867 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 25, 2008

    If the right was not clearly established at the time of the violation, the official is entitled to qualified immunity. 6 Id. A. … Therefore, the First Amendment rights advanced by CarePartners were clearly established for the purpose of evaluating the State employees’ qualified immunity defense.

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • Wynn v. Morgan

    861 F. Supp. 622 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 8, 1994

    However, the Sixth Circuit noted, the defendants may assert the defense of qualified immunity to the extent that their conduct “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … were “clearly established” at the time the actions were taken.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Jack McLaurin v. Keith Morton and Roger Marriott

    48 F.3d 944 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 3, 1995

    qualified immunity question ... … [defendant] actually did commit acts that would violate -a clearly established right, then summary judgment on qualified immunity is improper.” Black, 4 F.3d at 445 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Almonte v. City of Long Beach

    478 F.3d 100 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 14, 2007

    Qualified Immunity Based on the “Policymaker Exception” The doctrine of qualified immunity shields public officials from personal liability for official actions, “unless their conduct violates clearly established constitutional … Stated differently, an official is entitled to qualified immunity (1) if the plaintiff has not alleged a violation of a constitutional right, (2) if that right was not clearly established at the time of the conduct, or (3

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.