Case law

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1990

SPIERS V. MAQNOLIA PETROLEUM CO., 244 P.2D 852 (OKL. 1951). THIS MAXIM IS NOT A RULE OF LAW AND CANNOT OVERRIDE THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT OF A STATUTE. SPIERS, AT 856. … AS SUCH, IT IS MY OPINION THAT THE BOARD MAY NOT REQUIRE MEMBERSHIP BY A PRIVATE SCHOOL IN A PRIVATE ASSOCIATION AS A PREREQUISITE TO LICENSURE BY THE BOARD. (JAMES ROBERT JOHNSON)

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 21, 1991

NO. 80-221; BURKHARDT V. CITY OF ENID, 771 P.2D 608, 611 (OKLA. 1989); VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS V. CHILDERS, 171 P.2D 618 (OKLA. 1946); HAWKS V. BLAND, 9 P.2D 720 (OKLA. 1932); YETTE V. … WAY V. GRAND LAKE ASSOCIATION. INC., 635 P.2D 1010, 1015-1018 (OKLA. 1981).

Opinion No. 68-330 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1968

Excise Board of Washita County v. Lowden, 189 Okl. 286 , 116 P.2d 700 , 702." … In the case of Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

Dale v. State

449 P.2d 921 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1969

The early case of Lee v. State, 28 Okl.Cr. 397 , 231 P. 324 , while not dealing specifically with this issue, sheds some light on it. In Lee v. … In the light of Lee v.

Pottawatomie County v. Alexander

68 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1918

See, also, Mok v. Detroit Bldg. & Sav. Ass’n, 30 Mich. 511 ; Bush v. Indianapolis, 120 Ind. 476 , 22 N. E. 422 . … Ass’n, 23 Kan. 499 ; Hicks v. Davis, State Auditor, 97 Kan. 312 , 154 Pac. 1030 : Board of Commissioners v. Aspen Min. & Smalt. Co., 3 Colo.

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2001

Oglesby v. Lib. Mut. Ins. Co., 832 P.2d 834 , 844 (Okla. 1992). … McNeill v. City of Tulsa, 953 P.2d 329 , 332 (Okla. 1998) (citing Simpson v. Okla. Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 409 P.2d 364 , 367 (Okla. 1965)).

Forston v. Heisler

363 P.2d 949 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 1, 1961

of Equalization that board allowed the full exemption of $1,000. . … The contention of May Heisler bears some resemblance in principle to that made in Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. Bonner, 185 Okl. 431 , 93 P.2d 1077 .

Armstrong v. City of Arnett

708 F. Supp. 320 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1989

In Serna v. … In Hinson v.

Opinion No. 76-194 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1976

See Mann v. Nyquist, 71 N.Y. Misc.2d 435, 336 N.Y.2d 270 (1972), and Sinapkin v. Nyquist, 68 N.Y. Misc.2d 214, 325 N.Y. Supp. 823 (1971). … See, State v. Board of Education of City of Duluth, 213 Minn. 550 , 7 N.W.2d 544 (1943). However, the principal purpose of the tenure statutes is to secure permanency in the teaching force.

In Re Neary

174 Okla. 513 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1935

Miller in the district court of Muskogee county, and immediately presented the matter to that court, Judge Enloe V. Vernor presiding; that the court acting upon the testimony of Mr. … That thereafter, and on the 27th day of January, 1933, the said cause came on for trial, and that after a hearing thereon, the presiding Judge Enloe V, Vernor called the respondent and the counsel for Mrs.

In Re Duncan

43 Okla. 691 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1914

Board of Com’rs of Kingfisher County v. Guaranty State Bank et al., 27 Okla. 736 , 117 Pac. 216 ; State et al. v. Cawthorn’s Estate, 31 Okla. 560 , 122 Pac. 522 ; Asher State Bank v. … Board of Commissioners of Pottawatomie County, 31 Okla. 145 , 120 Pac. 634 .

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 30, 1996

Article V , Section 55 (emphasis added). ¶ 2 In both State v. Carter, 30 P.2d 700 , 703 (Okla. 1934), and Miller v. … As the Oklahoma Supreme Court recognized years ago in Miller v.

Perry v. State

561 P.2d 112 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1977

and by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by the Board for this purpose. … See, Box v. State, Okl.Cr., 541 P.2d 262 (1975).

Ex Parte Bailey

1 Okla. Crim. 115 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1908

Wilson v. People, 3 Colo. 325 ; Packer v. People, *119 8 Colo. 362 , 8 Pac. 564 ; State v. Carrington, 15 Utah 488 , 50 Pac. 526 : Higgins v. Brown et al., supra. … In Re Inerarity, Adm’r v.

In Re Farmers' Union Hospital Ass'n

190 Okla. 661 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1942

Association cites In re Beta Theta Pi, 108 Okla. 78 , 234 P. 354 ; Board of Com’rs Garfield County v. Phillips University, 144 Okla. 57 , 289 P. 720 ; State v. … San. v. Town, 228 Wis. 507 , 279 N.W. 623 ; Steward v. Calif., etc., Ass’n, supra; Hallinan v. Prindle, 220 Cal. 46 , 29 P. 2d 202 ; Baker v. Board of Trustees, 133 Cal. App. 243 , 23 P. 2d 1071 ; Hamilton v.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 1989

SEE SPEARMAN V. … V.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1990

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CHOCTAW NATION V. CRAYTOR, 600 P.2D 314 (OKL. 1979). … ELIMINATION/SUPERVISION OF THE BOARD.

Sholer v. ERC MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC

256 P.3d 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 2011

Pickens v. Tulsa Metropolitan Ministry, see note 22, supra. . Brown v. Nicholson, Pate, & Spears, 1997 OK 32, 16 , 935 P.2d 319 ; Henryetta Constr. Co. v. … Brown v. Nicholson, Pate, & Spears, see note 24, supra. . Henryetta Constr. Co. v. Harris, see note 24, supra; Rogers v. Hennessee, 1979 OK 138 , 13, 602 P.2d 1033 . . Pickens v.

Menefee, State Treas. v. Askew

25 Okla. 623 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1910

Board Com’rs of State Soldiers’ & Sailors’ Monument, 115 Ind. 591 , 18 N. E. 33 ; Kingsbury v. Anderson, 5 Idaho, 771, 51 Pac. 744 ; People ex rel. Hegwer v. Goodykoontz, 22 Colo. 507 , 45 Pac. 414 ; State v. … authorized and required to issue his warrants for the amounts thus expended upon vouchers therefor, properly authenticated by said board for the payment of the salaries of the members of the said board; and the Treasurer

IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION No. 420 STATE QUESTION No. 804

2020 OK 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 2020

In Kerby v. … Moran v.