Case law

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Quality Rubber Manufacturing Company, Inc., Intervenor v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor v. Quality Rubber Manufacturing Company, Inc.

430 F.2d 519 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 24, 1970

430 F.2d 519 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, Quality Rubber Manufacturing Company, Inc., Intervenor, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … of America v.

In Re Richardson

692 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1997

See Barry v. … Overmyer Co. v.

Daley v. United States

739 A.2d 814 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1999

owned a pistol; and Johnson saw Brown hand his pistol to Daley. … Hairston v. Gennet, 501 A.2d 1265, 1268 (D.C.1985); Joyner v. Jonathan Woodner Co., 479 A.2d 308, 312 (D.C.1984); Harris v. Akindulureni, 342 A.2d 684, 686-87 (D.C.1975).

In Re Greenspan

910 A.2d 324 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2006

District of Columbia v. … Gen.Stat. § 51-84 (2003); Burton v.

Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

716 F.3d 183 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 2013

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge, and EDWARDS and SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judges. … Id. § 2.309(f)(1)(ii), (v), (vii).

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

992 A.2d 1276 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 2010

Logan v. … Hosp. v.

Shaw v. Esper

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2023

See Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992). A 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss is designed to “test[] the legal sufficiency of a complaint.” Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Rodriguez, 857 F.3d at 906 (“district courts have routinely reviewed those board decisions in the first instance.”); see also, e.g., McKinney v. Wormuth, 5 F.4th 42 (D.C. Cir. 2021); Kidwell v.

Aguiar v. Pare

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2019

) MICHAEL AGUIAR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: January 31, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Joseph M. Keating v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of California, Ex Rel. California State Water Resources Control Board, Intervenor

927 F.2d 616 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 10, 1991

Control Board. … Dist. v. Andrews, 758 F.2d 508 , 511 (10th Cir.1985); Orleans Audubon Soc’y v.

In Re Micheel

610 A.2d 231 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 19, 1992

See, e.g., Montague v. Henderson, 409 A.2d 627, 628 (D.C.1979). … Montague v. Henderson, supra, 409 A.2d at 628 . .

Dolphin & Bradbury, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

512 F.3d 634 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 2008

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. … Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.  2 BROWN, Circuit Judge: Dolphin & Bradbury, Inc. and Robert J.

In Re Artis

883 A.2d 85 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 2005

R. 16 & 17); see also Moms v. … See Snyder v. Maryland Cas.

White v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.

303 F. Supp. 3d 5 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 2018

(citing Byrd v. District of Columbia, 1991 WL 336038 , *1 (D.D.C. Sept. 12, 1991) ; Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, 359 A.2d 28 , 31 n.4 (D.C. 1976) ); see also Brown v. … Moreover, the Supreme Court ruled in Board of Trustees v.

Smith v. United States

984 A.2d 196 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 2009

See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 795 A.2d 56 , 62 n. 2 (D.C.2002); Littlejohn v. United States, 749 A.2d 1253, 1258 (D.C.2000). … Superior Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 35, like all the Superi- or Court Rules, was enacted by the Board of Judges, not by Congress.

Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of Agriculture

944 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 1996

Co. v. … Adams v.

United States v. Jones

584 F.3d 1083 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 2009

Rollins also could not see what was in the cup or the brown bag. … Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124–25 (2000).

Meat & Highway Drivers, Dockmen, Helpers & Miscellaneous Truck Terminal Employees, Local Union No. 710 v. National Labor Relations Board

348 F.2d 803 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1965

Meat and Highway Drivers, Dockmen, etc. v. N. L. R. B., 118 U.S.App.D.C. 287, 294-295 , 335 F.2d 709 , 716-717 (1964). (Emphasis supplied; footnotes omitted.) … See Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413, etc. v. N. L. R. B., 118 U.S.App.D.C. 149 , 158, 334 F.2d 539 , 548 (1964). So ordered. . 73 Stat. 543 , 29 U.S.C. § 158 (e).

Penello v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

223 F. Supp. 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 1963

B. v. … B. v. Retail Clerks International Association, Local No. 57, D.C., 188 F. Supp. 847, 852 ; Penello for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v.

International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Scott's Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Scott's, Inc., International Union of Electrical, Radio Andmachine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

383 F.2d 230 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 6, 1967

Wheeler v. … In N.L.R.B. v.

Michael F. Dilley, Captain, U.S. Army Reserve v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army Raymond W. Fontaine, Major, U.S. Army Reserve v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army Milton D. O'Quinn v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army. Major Russell A. Powell v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army

603 F.2d 914 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 26, 1979

See Harmon v. Brucker, supra; Geiger v. Brown, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 132, 135-37 , 419 F.2d 714, 717-19 (1969); Roberts v. Vance, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 367 , 371, 343 F.2d 236, 240 (1964). … Accord, United States v. Brown, 206 U.S. 240, 244 , 27 S.Ct. 620 , 51 L.Ed. 1046 (1907). 23 We agree with the Army that McClaughry's jurisdictionally-based analysis is inapposite here.