Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

0.40s

  • In Re Diehr

    174 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1935

    See, also, Board of Com’rs v. State Board of Equalization, 155 Okla. 183 , 8 P. (2d) 732 736 , and cases cited. … Be Gross Production Tax Wolverine Oil Co., supra; Board of Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization, supra, and cases there cited.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bliss Hotel Company v. Thompson

    378 P.2d 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1962

    Evansville *322 Mercantile Association v. … In commenting upon such valuation, this court said in Wilkin v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Spellman ex rel. Spellman v. Mount

    696 P.2d 510 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1984

    In Runyon v. … Ely v. Richard L.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 77-138 (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1977

    In the case of Gobel v. Mazie Dependent School District, 488 P.2d 156 (1971), the court considered a situation in which the State Board of Education had been relying on Attorney General Opinions from 1941 and 1959. … Peterson v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, Okl., 395 P.2d 388 (1964)."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-145 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 1968

    The board or officer must administer the licensing statute in accordance with its provisions." The Oklahoma Supreme Court in Boydston v. … Eslin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-141 (1973) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1973

    The circumstance of an insufficient number of students was presented to the Supreme Court of Oregon in the case of Funston v. District School Board for School District No. 1 in Multnomah County, 278 P. 1075 (1929). … In the recent case of Bruinsma v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2007)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 2007

    In a case involving the Governor and a corporation commissioner, the Oklahoma Supreme Court, in Nesbitt v. … Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). In your inquiry, the language of 51 O.S. 2001 , § 8[ 51-8 ] is plain and its meaning must be accepted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richards v. State

    569 P.2d 461 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 31, 1977

    The Best Evidence Rule is stated in Hayes v. … Contu v. State, Okl.Cr., 533 P.2d 1000 (1975). Trantham v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ellis v. State

    76 P.3d 1131 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 2003

    Bauman asked Appellant's stepmother, Valencia Brown, when Appellant had come home the night before. Mrs. Brown said she did not remember. Mrs. Brown then spoke to her husband on the phone, and Bauman overheard Mrs. … Rainey v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 78-206 (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1978

    With respect to that which constitutes in law a public office or public officer, this office has previously noted and applied those tests and criteria set forth in the cases of State v. Sowards, 64 Okl. … Cr. 430 , 82 P.2d 324 (1938) and Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Company, 178 Okl. 212 , 62 P.2d 94 (1936). In Sowards, supra, the Court stated, in paragraphs 2 and 3 of its syllabus: "2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma City Bldg. Loan Ass'n v. Hinton

    169 Okla. 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

    The case is almost exactly like that of Tolbert v. Chisholm, 163 Okla. 92 , 21 P. (2d) 16 . … Brown and Mr. P. W. Cress, the cause was assigned to a Justice of this court for examination and report to the court. Thereafter, upon consideration, this opinion was adopted.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Miller v. State

    579 P.2d 200 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 18, 1978

    Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 481 P.2d 475 (1971). … Brown v. State, supra. Rather, there must be other facts shown from which it can be fairly inferred that the defendant had dominion and control over the seized substance.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In Re Protest of Bendelari, Agent

    82 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1921

    Co. v. Harrison, 235 U. … the judgment of the State Board of Equalization is therefore affirmed.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Badger Oil & Gas Co. v. Preston

    49 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

    Unless a stated term is fixed in the contract of employment, undoubtedly such agent holds his agency subject to be terminated at the pleasure of the board of directors.” In Watson v. Gugine, 204 N. Y. 535 , 98 N. … C. 326; Parker v. Nickerson, 112 Mass. 195 ; Mt. Vernon Bank v. Porter, 148 Mo. 176 , 49 S. W. 982 ; Jackson v. Ludeling, 21 Wall. 616, 22 L. Ed. 492 ; Cook v. Sherman (C. C.) 20 Fed. 167 ; Bird Coal & Iron Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Gibson v. State

    45 Okla. Crim. 412 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1929

    In Blanck v. State, 14 Okla. … Brown v. State, 42 Okla. Cr. 11 , 273 Pac. 1018 . The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. The instructions were fair to this defendant and substantially stated the law.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bailey & Collins v. Ryan Cotton Oil Mill Co.

    119 Okla. 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1926

    Brown receivers of the Ryan Ootton Oil Company in the case of the Oklahoma National Bank of Chickasha, Okla., v. … Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-133 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 29, 1968

    In Cook et al. v. Cordell, 160 Okl. 59 , 15 P.2d 565 , the court stated: ". . . … Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 297 P. 315 ; Hines v. Winters, Okl. 320 P.2d 1114 . In Trapp, State Auditor v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Johnson, Co.

    85 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1922

    PITCHFORD, V. C. J. This action was commenced in the district court of Pawnee county, Okla., by plaintiff to recover of defendant taxes which it alleges were unlawfully levied against it and which it paid under protest. … There is nothing in the record showing that the excise board, in estimating the needs of the county, included any item for draggable roads.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Town of Burbank v. Sheel

    131 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1928

    This statute was construed and held to mean what it says in Bocox v. Town of Bixby, 114 Okla. 269 , 247 Pac. 20 , and in Edmonds v. … Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • R.L.R. v. Prague Public School District I-103

    838 F. Supp. 1526 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 31, 1993

    Sipka v. Soet, 761 F.Supp. 761, 766 (D.Kan.1991); Hutson by Hutson v. Bell, 702 F.Supp. 212, 214 (N.D.Ill.1988); Doe “A” v. Special Sch. Dist. of St. … See generally Maldonado v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.