Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

0.57s

  • Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl--Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Jimmy-Richard Co., Inc.,intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Jimmy--Richard Company, Inc., Amalgamated Clothing Workers Ofamerica, Intervenor

    527 F.2d 803 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 13, 1976

    P 11,169 AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL--CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Jimmy-Richard Co., Inc.,Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Securities & Exchange Commission v. General Refractories Co.

    400 F. Supp. 1248 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 1975

    Board Representation 15. From 1965 until April 1971, H. Mayer was represented on the Board of Directors of GRX by Otto Griesser. Subsequently, from April 1971 until April 1975, H. … SEC, 309 F.2d 93 (8th Cir. 1962); SEC v. Atlas Tack Corp., 93 F.Supp. 111, 115 (D.Mass. 1950). 40. The business dealings with H. Mayer, his board representation and his *1258 stockholdings were material facts.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Matter of Williams

    513 A.2d 793 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1986

    See The Florida Bar v. Randolph, 238 So.2d 635, 638 (Fla.1970); Louisiana Bar Association v. Edwards, supra note 2, 387 So.2d at 1139. … Arden v. State Bar, 52 Cal.2d 310, 321 , 341 P.2d 6, 13 (1959) (en banc) (per curiam); The Florida Bar v. Papy, 358 So.2d 4, 7 (1978) (per curiam); Attorney Grievance Commission v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Schlottman v. Solis

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2012

    See Bowa’en v. Um`ted States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C. Cir. l997) (citing Brown v. Gen. Servs. Aa’min., 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 (1976)). … Newcastle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Estate of Munawar

    981 A.2d 584 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2009

    Brown. The language at the top of the first page of the deed, as provided by the Recorder's office, indicates that the VA sold the deed to "Mary L. Brown, unmarried." … BROWN FRANKLIN TIBBS ... When recorded mail to: MARY L. BROWN FRANKLIN TIBBS 527 16th Street, NE Apt # 1 Washington, DC 20002 Approximately ten years later, in March 1999, Mary L. Brown married Mohammad Munawar.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Berrigan v. Sigler

    475 F.2d 918 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 17, 1973

    Brown Shoe v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962); McSurley v. McClellan, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 187 , 426 F.2d 664 (1970). … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nick Bombard, Inc. v. Proctor

    47 A.2d 405 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1946

    Thierry v. Gilbert, 1 Cir., 147 F.2d 603 ; Bowles v. American Stores, 78 U.S. App.D.C. 238, 139 E.2d 377, certiorari denied 322 U.S. 730 , 64 S.Ct. 947 , 88 L. Ed. 1565 ; Brown v. … Hobart Estate Co., Cal.Sup., 159 P.2d 958, 975 ; Blackwell v. American Film Co., Inc., 189 Cal. 689 , 209 P. 999 ; Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. Beach, 66 Colo. 226 , 180 P. 982 ; Smith v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Michael F. Dilley, Captain, U.S. Army Reserve v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army Raymond W. Fontaine, Major, U.S. Army Reserve v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army Milton D. O'Quinn v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army. Major Russell A. Powell v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army

    603 F.2d 914 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 26, 1979

    See Harmon v. Brucker, supra; Geiger v. Brown, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 132, 135-37 , 419 F.2d 714, 717-19 (1969); Roberts v. Vance, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 367 , 371, 343 F.2d 236, 240 (1964). … Accord, United States v. Brown, 206 U.S. 240, 244 , 27 S.Ct. 620 , 51 L.Ed. 1046 (1907). 23 We agree with the Army that McClaughry's jurisdictionally-based analysis is inapposite here.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robert P. Smith v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense

    513 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 1975

    See also Williams v. Robinson, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 204 , 432 F.2d 637, 642 (1970). This rule is not iron-clad. See Williams v. Robinson, supra, at 642 n. 17; Brown v. … Schneider v. Smith, 390 U.S. 17 , 88 S.Ct. 682 , 19 L.Ed.2d 799 (1968); Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Harmon v.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Weidel v. Ashcroft

    234 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 24, 2002

    Gant v. Wallingford Board of Education, 195 F.3d 134, 152 (2d Cir.1999). … See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 453 (D.C.Cir.1999)(plaintiff in retaliation action must establish causality).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wilson-Bey v. United States

    903 A.2d 818 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 2006

    Brown was one of the women who had joined Ms. Blackwell in attacking Ms. Marbury. Upon arrival at Teresa Brown’s apartment house, the women tried to locate Ms. Brown’s unit, and they yelled at Ms. Brown to come out. Ms. … Brown; Ms. Marbury allegedly made a similar threat to Ms. Brown’s fian-cé. When Ms. Brown declined to leave her apartment, several of the women took turns stomping on Ms.

    Cited 127 timesPublished
  • United States v. Pedro Jolio Prandy-Binett

    995 F.2d 1069 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 11, 1993

    Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742-43 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1543 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (plurality opinion of Rehnquist, J.). … See, e.g., Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. at 734, 743 , 103 S.Ct. at 1539, 1543 ; United States v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Local 483, International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    288 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 1961

    This term, in Board parlance, signifies the removal as a result of an election of a craft group from a broader bargaining unit of which it was previously a part. … See Jones, Self-Determination v. Stability of Labor Relations, 58 Mich.L.Rev. 313 (1960); Cox, The Legal Nature of Collective Bargaining Agreements, 57 Mich.L.Rev. 1, 12, (1958).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • WIBC, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    259 F.2d 941 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1958

    Brown v. District of Columbia, 1888, 127 U.S. 579, 586 , 8 S.Ct. 1314 , 32 L.Ed. 262 ; United States v. Ballin, Joseph & Co., 1891, 144 U.S. 1 , 12 S.Ct. 507 , 36 L.Ed. 321 ; Frischer & Co. v. … State Tax Comm., 1946, 109 Utah 563 , 168 P.2d 324 ; Adkins v. Citizens Board, 1932, 112 W.Va. 171 , 163 S.E. 853, 854 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Malloy v. United States

    797 A.2d 687 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 2002

    The caller did not testify at trial, but a tape of her 911 call was introduced through Officer Brown. … See Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946). Questioning of Officer Brown was not the only means through which the evidence could have been introduced.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Friends of Tilden Park, Inc. v. District of Columbia

    806 A.2d 1201 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 2002

    Friends is governed by a self-perpetuating board of directors. … See United Food & Commercial Workers Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 555-56 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). B.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Bannum, Inc. v. Citizens for a Safe Ward Five, Inc.

    383 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2005

    See Letter from Carolyn Brown to Michael Johnson (Dec. 11, 2000) (“Johnson Concurrence”), Ex. 7 to Def. Mot. Dism. … Summit Health, Ltd. v. Pinhas, 500 U.S. 322, 325 , 111 S.Ct. 1842 , 114 L.Ed.2d 366 (1991); Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Browning v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Smith v. United States

    984 A.2d 196 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 2009

    See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 795 A.2d 56 , 62 n. 2 (D.C.2002); Littlejohn v. United States, 749 A.2d 1253, 1258 (D.C.2000). … Superior Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 35, like all the Superi- or Court Rules, was enacted by the Board of Judges, not by Congress.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Washington v. White

    231 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2002

    Although Brown had instructed Ms. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board, Wire Service Guild, Local 222, the News-Paper Guild, Afl-Cio-Clc, Intervenor. Noel M. Yancey v. National Labor Relations Board, the Associated Press, Intervenor

    492 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 20, 1974

    P 14,325 ASSOCIATED PRESS, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Wire Service Guild, Local 222, The News-paper Guild, AFL-CIO-CLC, Intervenor. Noel M. YANCEY, Petitioner v. … Auburn Rubber Co., 10 Cir., 384 F.2d 1 (1967); Ramsey v. NLRB, supra note 1, 327 F.2d 784 . See also language favorable to the Spielberg policy in NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.