Case law

Bliss Hotel Company v. Thompson

378 P.2d 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1962

Evansville *322 Mercantile Association v. … In commenting upon such valuation, this court said in Wilkin v.

Doyle v. State

759 P.2d 223 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 11, 1988

Miller , at 202; Sturgeon v. State, 483 P.2d 335, 338 (Okla.Crim.App.1971); Brown v. State, 481 P.2d 475, 477-78 (Okla.Crim.App.1971). Guilty knowledge and control cannot be presumed. … Hishaw v. State, 568 P.2d 643, 645 (Okla.Crim.App.1977); Brown , at 477-78.

Opinion No. 77-138 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1977

In the case of Gobel v. Mazie Dependent School District, 488 P.2d 156 (1971), the court considered a situation in which the State Board of Education had been relying on Attorney General Opinions from 1941 and 1959. … Peterson v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, Okl., 395 P.2d 388 (1964)."

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1996

Austin Western Road Machinery Company v. … It is well established in Oklahoma that the board of county commissioners "has general control over the property and finances of the county." Cavin v.

Opinion No. 68-145 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 1968

The board or officer must administer the licensing statute in accordance with its provisions." The Oklahoma Supreme Court in Boydston v. … Eslin v.

Whitehall Homeowners Ass'n v. Appletree Enterprise, Inc.

309 P.3d 144 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 3, 2013

Finnell v. Jebco Seismic, 2003 OK 35, ¶ 7 , 67 P.3d 339, 342 . … The decision in Twin Creek Estates, LLC v.

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 1998

DiMauro v. Oklahoma Board of Medical Examiners, 769 P.2d 759 (Okla. 1989). … The statute does not specify the way the Board is authorized to do this, so it is left to the judgment and discretion of the Board. See Application of State Board of Medical Examiners, 206 P.2d 211 (Okla. 1949).

City of Norman v. International Ass'n of Firefighters Local 2067

307 P.3d 351 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 2013

(citing Payne v. Jones, 1944 OK 86 , 146 P.2d 113 ). … City of Oklahoma City v.

Sharpe v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association

1968 Okl Jud. 1 · Court on the Judiciary of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1968

Garner v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles, 341 U.S. 716 , 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 (1951) ; Adler v. … Board of Education, etc., 342 U.S. 485 , 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 , 27 A.L.R.2d 472 (1952); Beilan v. Board of Public Education, etc., 357 U.S. 399 , 78 S.Ct. 1317 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1414 (1958); Keyishian v.

Oklahoma City Bldg. Loan Ass'n v. Hinton

169 Okla. 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

The case is almost exactly like that of Tolbert v. Chisholm, 163 Okla. 92 , 21 P. (2d) 16 . … Brown and Mr. P. W. Cress, the cause was assigned to a Justice of this court for examination and report to the court. Thereafter, upon consideration, this opinion was adopted.

Opinion No. 68-210 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1968

In Board of Education of Independent School District Number One of Tulsa County v. S. J. … In Board of Education of Independent School District Number One of Tulsa County v. S. J.

In Re Protest of Bendelari, Agent

82 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1921

Co. v. Harrison, 235 U. … the judgment of the State Board of Equalization is therefore affirmed.

Appeal of the Order of Annexation Dated April 10, 1968, Issued by Wickstrum

454 P.2d 660 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1969

School District No. 9 of Tulsa County v. … Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 185 Okl. 342 , 91 P. 2d 771 .

Simpson v. Highfill

172 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1935

This rule is stated in Wilson v. … L. 1114; Thayer v. Honeywell (Kan. App.) 51 P. 929 ; Brown v. Brown (Cal. App.) 256 P. 595 ; Spencer v. Industrial Comm. (Utah) 20 P. (2d) 618 . No evidence of a former adjudication was before the court.

Strong v. Oklahoma City Public Schools, Independent School District No. 89

68 O.B.A.J. 1478 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1997

Juvenal v. … Okeene Public Schools, 878 P.2d 1026, 1029 (Okla.1994) (notice of claim given to city, whose board of trustees oversaw operations of the public works authority, was sufficient notice to the authority); Lucas v.

R.L.R. v. Prague Public School District I-103

838 F. Supp. 1526 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 31, 1993

Sipka v. Soet, 761 F.Supp. 761, 766 (D.Kan.1991); Hutson by Hutson v. Bell, 702 F.Supp. 212, 214 (N.D.Ill.1988); Doe “A” v. Special Sch. Dist. of St. … See generally Maldonado v.

Young v. Missouri, O. G. R. Co.

44 Okla. 611 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1915

Scoville et al. v. Powell et al., 33 Okla. 446 , 126 Pac. 730 . Plaintiff in error assigns as error the giving of certain instructions. … Laws 1910; Finch et al. v. Brown et al., 27 Okla. 217, 111 Pac. 391 ; Straughan v. Cooper, 41 Okla. 515 , 139 Pac. 265 ; Shuler et al. v. Hall, 42 Okla. 325 , 141 Pac. 280 . The cause should therefore be affirmed.

Opinion No. 68-136 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1968

all the educational requirements, as specified in 59 O.S. 164 [ 59-164 ] (1961), and has passed both parts of the National Board of Examinations of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners without successfully examining … (Emphasis added) The language "shall examine all applicants" and "Board shall examine" are words of command and are compulsory upon the Board rather than directory. The Court in State v.

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1995

of education ("board") has sole control over student activity funds ("activity funds"). 1 The purpose of the activity funds must be approved and regulated by the board. … Independent School District No. 8 of Seiling v. Swanson, 553 P.2d 496 , 501 (Okla. 1976) citing Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.

Coffey v. Robert McMullan & Son, Inc.

570 P.2d 1152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1977

Department of Highways v. … However, in State Board of Public Affairs v.