Case law

Ingram v. NC State Bd. of Plumbing, Heating

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 2020

10 -  INGRAM V. … The Board is expressly authorized - 11 -  INGRAM V. N.C. STATE BD.

Bigley v. Lombardo

90 N.C. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1988

The Ross Realty and Chemical Bank analysis, however, conflicted with the rationale of an earlier Supreme Court decision, Brown v. Kirkpatrick, 217 N.C. 486 , 8 S.E. 2d 601 (1940). … The court “expressly rejected] the reasoning of Brown”; however, it noted that the result in Brown might be correct since the deed of trust “was not a ‘purchase-money deed of trust under G.S. 45-21.38.’ Childers v.

State v. Jolley

312 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1984

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 502 . 3 He thereupon secured the residence by roping it off and posting signs. He thereby lawfully seized the rifle. … Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 502 (1983).

Stacy v. Merrill

191 N.C. App. 131 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2008

An action against a commission or board created by statute as an agency of the State where the interest or rights of the State are directly affected is in fact an action against the State. Meyer v. … The Board is a local board of education as defined in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-5(5) (2007). N.C. Gen.

Cook v. UNION ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

649 S.E.2d 458 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 2007

"[A]ny person aggrieved" has standing to appeal the decision of a board of *466 adjustment pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 153A-345(b) (2003). See Lloyd v. … Heery v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C.App. 612, 613 , 300 S.E.2d 869, 870 (1983) (internal citations and quotations omitted).

Wake County Board of Education v. L.P., a minor child

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 8, 2023

Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Const. Co., 559 F.2d 928, 933 (4th Cir. 1977). … Lorsson v. Chapel Hill-Carrboro Bd. of Educ., 773 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2014).

Lumbee Enter. Dev. Inc., LLC v. Lumbee Reg'l Dev. Ass'n

2020 NCBC 38 · North Carolina Business Court · May 8, 2020

Inc., LLC v. Lumbee Reg’l Dev. Ass’n, 2020 NCBC 38. … Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v.

Nantz v. Employment Security Commission

28 N.C. App. 626 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1976

In Board of *629 Regents v. … First-Citizens Bank and Trust Company v. Camp, 409 F. 2d 1086 (4th Cir. 1969). The trial court correctly dismissed the action against the State Personnel Board.

Gunter v. Anders

115 N.C. App. 331 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 1994

However, as cited in our earlier opinion, in Clary v. … Based on Fields v. Board of Education, Clary v. Board of Education, and Presnell v.

City of Asheville v. Aly

233 N.C. App. 620 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 2014

While the Civil Service Act — as originally enacted — did not provide a mechanism for judicial review of the Board’s decisions, Jacobs v. City of Asheville, 137 N.C. … Koufman v.

Stratford v. City of Greensboro

124 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1899

Domain, section 238; Boom v. Patterson, 98 U. S., 403 ; Broadnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 ; Vaughan v. Commissioners, 117 N. C., 434. … In Baltimore v.

Hughes v. Anchor Enterprises, Inc.

245 N.C. 131 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1956

See also, Cab Co. v. Casualty Co., 219 N.C. 788 , 15 S.E. 2d 295 . Brogden, J., in Brown v. … Hence, the theory on which Brown v. Wood, supra, was decided, has no application here. In Barber v. R.

State v. McGrady

191 N.C. App. 401 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 2008

Brown at the clinic. Dr. Brown reviewed "paperwork" prepared by Ms. Peterson and interviewed Anne's grandmother. Next, through a two-way mirror, Dr. Brown observed another clinic employee interview Anne. … Brown conducted a physical examination of Anne. Dr. Brown testified that Anne had a flat affect which raised a "concern for possible depression." Dr.

Sullivan v. Smith

56 N.C. App. 525 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1982

Clark v. Bodycombe, 289 N.C. 246 , 221 S.E. 2d 506 (1976); Horton v. Insurance Co., 9 N.C. App. 140 , 175 S.E. 2d 725 (1970); see also Dickinson v. Pake, 284 N.C. 576 , 201 S.E. 2d 897 (1974); Ridge v. Grimes, 53 N.C. … He relies primarily on Brown v. Louisburg, 126 N.C. 701 , 36 S.E. 166 (1900). Brown is in apposite, and the argument is without merit.

Potts v. Potts

24 N.C. App. 673 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1975

Hester v. Hester, 239 N.C. 97 , 79 S.E. 2d 248 (1953). … See Wilson v. Wilson, 261 N.C. 40 , 134 S.E. 2d 240 (1964) ; Fuchs v. Fuchs, 260 N.C. 635 , 133 S.E. 2d 487 (1963) ; and Brown v. Brown, 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 (1933).

State v. . Ballance

229 N.C. 764 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1949

such applicant, and if an applicant shall fail to satisfy the Board in any or all of these respects, the Board may decline to admit said applicant to examination, or to issue license." … may offend the undefined ethical standards of the Board.

Abbott Realty Co. v. City of Charlotte

198 N.C. 564 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1930

the board of commissioners, or reduced to writing and approved by the board, or expressly authorized by ordinance or resolution adopted by the board. … McPhail v. Commissioners, 119 N. C., 330 , 25 S. E., 958 . There was error in the judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit. The judgment must be Eeversed.

Johnson v. Pearce

148 N.C. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 28, 2001

Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C. App. 377, 380 , 477 S.E.2d 234, 237 (1996). … Carrier, 214 N.C. 191, 195 , 198 S.E. 619, 621 (1938) (quoting 30 C.J. 1156); see also Brown, 124 N.C. App. at 380 , 477 S.E.2d at 237 ; Cannon v. Miller, 71 N.C.

Q.C. v. WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 26, 2022

Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287, 295 (1985). … Contractors of Am. v.

Hinson v. Britt

232 N.C. 379 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1950

Jordan v. Harris, 225 N.C. 763 , 36 S.E. 2d 270 . … Scott v. Bryan, 210 N.C. 478 , 187 S.E. 756 ; Pemberton v. Greensboro, 205 N.C. 599 , 172 S.E. 196 ; 5 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, section 1689. Affirmed.