Case law

Teamsters Local Union No. 515, Affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board

906 F.2d 719 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1990

The Board’s interpretation of the Act on this point is a permissible one, to which we must defer. See, e.g., NLRB v. … Brief for Board at 43. The Board then cites as supporting authority Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v.

Winters v. United States Agency for International Development

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2016

ATC Petroleum, 860 F.2d at 1111, quoting Int’l Org. of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Brown, 698 F.2d 536, 551 (D.C. Cir. 1983). … And even a mixed- case appeal to the Board must comply with filing deadlines. See Schlottman v. Solis, 845 F.

Wetzel v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs

949 F. Supp. 2d 198 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2013

Compare Brown v. EPA, 384 F. … See Brown, 384 F. Supp. 2d at 276-77.

International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Scott's Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Scott's, Inc., International Union of Electrical, Radio Andmachine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

383 F.2d 230 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 6, 1967

Wheeler v. … In N.L.R.B. v.

United States v. Savoy

889 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 5, 2012

Katz v. … Brown’s Mot. 3 (citing United States v. Feliz, 20 F.Supp.2d 97, 104 (D.Me.1998)); United States v. Weaver, 99 F.3d 1372, 1378 (6th Cir.1996).

In Re Zdravkovich

831 A.2d 964 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2003

See, e.g., Miller v. Avirom, 127 U.S.App. D.C. 867, 369-70, 384 F.2d 319, 321-22 (1967); Waugh v. D.C. Dep’t of Employment Servs., 786 A.2d 595, 596 (D.C.2001). … See Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v.

Insurance Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, United Insurance Company of America v. National Labor Relations Board

360 F.2d 823 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 11, 1966

360 F.2d 823 INSURANCE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … See General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200, 206 , 56 S.Ct. 185 , 80 L.Ed. 154 (1935) 12 National Labor Relations Board v. American Nat. Ins.

Cox v. Graphic Communications conference/international Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2009

General Board.” … Brown v. NAS, 844 A.2d 1113, 1117 (D.C. 2004). In this case, Plaintiff discovered Mr.

Munn Bey v. Department of Corrections

839 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2011

Waker v. Brown, 754 F.Supp.2d 62, 64 (D.D.C.2010); see also Cameron v. Thornburgh, 983 F.2d 253, 258 (D.C.Cir.1993); Elkins v. District of Columbia, 610 F.Supp.2d 52, 64 (D.D.C.2009). … Nowhere in the Complaint, however, does Munn Bey explain how Britton and Brown's failure to personally respond to his grievances is a constitutional violation. Doe by Fein v.

S. Simcha Goldman v. Secretary of Defense

734 F.2d 1531 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1984

Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. at 353-58 , 100 S.Ct. at 598-01 (upholding different Air Force regulations). … Unlike the states in Wisconsin v. Yoder, Thomas v. Review Board, and Sherbert v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.

592 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 2009

See FTC v. … See FTC v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., 548 F.3d at 1034, 1041 (Brown, J.); id. at 1050 (Tatel, J.).

Ware v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

157 A.3d 1275 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 2017

See Springer v. … Further, even though petitioner raises an important concern regarding the CRB’s authority to raise issues sua sponte, see Brown v.

Potomac Engineers, Inc. v. Walser

127 F. Supp. 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1954

This statute, in brief, creates a District of Columbia Board of Registration for Professional Engineers, whose function it is to register professional engineers. … The Court concludes that the Board was correct in taking the position that a corporation is not entitled to registration as a professional engineer.

Solomon v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CARGYLE BROWN SOLOMON, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

United States v. Philip Morris Inc.

263 F. Supp. 2d 72 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2003

In Falise v. … See e.g., Blanton v. United States, 213 F. 320, 325 (8th Cir.1914); United States v. Pike, 158 F.2d 46, 47 (7th Cir.1946); United States v. Pearlstein, 576 F.2d 531 (3d Cir.1978); United States v.

Local Union No. 636, United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry v. National Labor Relations Board

430 F.2d 906 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 1970

Moreover, the Board’s application of the “right to control” test completely ignores the teaching of the Supreme Court in National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass’n v. … See Beacon Castle Square Building Corp. v. NLRB, 1 Cir., 406 F.2d 188 , 192 n. 10 (1969) . See also Danielson v. Painters District Council No. 20, etc., S.D.N.Y., 305 F.Supp. 1108, 1113-1117 (1969) ; Rotenberg v.

Martins Okoro v. Pompeo

District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2021

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) GAIL MARTINS OKORO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: May 5, 2021 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

United States v. Angel Torres, A/K/A Victor Sanchez

115 F.3d 1033 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1997

Unnecessary to the court’s disposition of the ease, the Brown footnote, admittedly lending itself to varying interpretations, binds neither us nor the district judge. Although we cited Brown in United States v. … As authority for its reading of the Rule, the Brown court cited United States v. Thompson, 475 F.2d 931 (D.C.Cir.1973). Like Brown , however, Thompson did not involve a motion for new trial.

Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

502 F.3d 176 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 2007

Before: HENDERSON, RANDOLPH and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. … In support, FERC relies on our decision in Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen v. Surface Transportation Board, 457 F.3d 24 (D.C. Cir. 2006). FERC’s reliance is misplaced.

Cna Financial Corporation v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor

830 F.2d 1132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1987

Chrysler Corp. v. Schlesinger, 565 F.2d 1172, 1186 (3d Cir.1977), vacated and remanded sub nom. Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra note 1. 53 . Goland v. … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra note 1, 441 U.S. at 317 , 99 S.Ct. at 1725 , 60 L.Ed.2d at 234 . 148 . See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v.