Case law

Ellis v. . Greene

191 N.C. 761 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1926

Board of Trustees v. Webb, 155 N. C., 379 ; Tyrrell v. Holloway, 182 N. C., 64 ; S. v. Jennette, 190 N. C., 96 ; Day v. Comrs. of Yadkin, post, 780. In Huneycutt v. Comrs., 182 N. … Comrs. of Johnston Co. v. Lacy, supra; Comrs. v. Boring, supra.

Speller v. . Speller

119 N.C. 356 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

.: The point presented has already been three, times passed upon by this Court: In Martin v. Chasteen, 75 N. C., 96 ; Andrews v. Whisnant, 83 N. C., 446 , and in Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. … Triplett v. Foster, 113 N. C., 389 , citing Bailey v. Brown, supra. Certiorari Denied.

Jones v. Cumberland County Brd. of Education

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 22, 2009

Russell v. Lowes , 108 N.C. App. 762 , 425 S.E.2d 454 (1993). *********** Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the undersigned enters the following: AWARD 1.

State v. Ethridge

168 N.C. App. 359 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 1, 2005

State v. … Here, as in State v.

Stratford v. City of Greensboro

124 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1899

Domain, section 238; Boom v. Patterson, 98 U. S., 403 ; Broadnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 ; Vaughan v. Commissioners, 117 N. C., 434. … In Baltimore v.

Henry v. . Hilliard

155 N.C. 372 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 31, 1911

Browne on Stat. … Browning v. Berry, 107 N. C., 235 ; Jordan v. Furnace Co., 126 N. C., 147 ; Winders v. Hill, 144 N. C., 617 .

MITCHELL v. WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 30, 2020

Defendant Ivey Brown is General Counsel for WSSU. (Id. ¶ 5.) Defendants Robinson, Berry, and Brown (together, “Individual Defendants”) are all employed by WSSU. … Also on August 10, Plaintiff’s counsel questioned Defendant Brown “as to whether he advised the Board of Trustees during the deliberations,” to which Defendant Brown responded, “

Charles Edward Brown v. First Advantage Background Services Corp. and Ashcott, LLC

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 14, 2025

J & J Sports Prods., Inc. v. After Six Prods., Inc., No. 13-CV-591, 2014 WL 644400, at *2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2014) (citing Anderson v. Found. for Advancement, Educ. & Emp. of Am. … Primrose v. Castle Branch, Inc., No. 14-CV-235, 2017 WL 57800, at *8 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 3, 2017) (alteration in original) (quoting Bryant v. Aiken Reg’l Med.

Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

4 F. Supp. 2d 435 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 17, 1998

Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 , 115 S.Ct. 552, 556 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994) (citation omitted). The presumption is strengthened where, as here, the disparate language is used within the same section. … Brown’s response does not rebut the asserted consequences of a cigarette equivalents analysis. 29 . See Portland Cement Ass'n v.

Winston-Salem Fire Fighters Club, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

259 N.C. 582 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963

This statement of the law was quoted with approval by Browning, J., speaking for the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia in Aldridge v. Piedmont Fire Ins. Co., 33 S.E. 2d 634 , 158 A.L.R. 892 . … Zoning Board, 114 A. 2d 331 , 52 A.L.R. 2d 1093 , said: “A ‘club,’ of which there are many different types, is, in substance, merely an organization or association of persons who meet or live together for the purpose of social

Lanvale Properties, LLC v. County of Cabarrus

366 N.C. 142 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 24, 2012

(citing Whitfield v. Longest, 28 N.C. (6 Ired.) 268 (1846); Hellen v. Noe, 25 N.C. (3 Ired.) 493 (1843); Shaw v. Kennedy, 4 N.C. (Taylor) 591 (1817)). … In Porsh Builders, Inc. v.

Wharton v. City of Greensboro

146 N.C. 356 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1907

Lilly v. Taylor, 88 N. C., 490 ; Jones v. Commissioners, 137 N. C., 592. In the well-considered opinion of Mr. … Brodnax v. Groom, supra; Fawcett v. Mount Airy, 134 N. C., 125 ; Wilson v. Commissioners, 74 N. C., 748 ; Tucker v. Commissioners, 75 N. C., 274 . We are of opinion that this issue is valid.

Langley v. Staley Hosiery Mills Co.

194 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1927

The jury was instructed, in accordance with the rule approved in Brown v. Chemical Co., 162 N. … Morrow v. Mills, 181 N. C., 423 ; Brown v. Chemical Co., supra. But we do not find in the record before us any sufficient evidence of the defendant’s consent to this effect.

Fidelity Bank v. Wysong & Miles Co.

177 N.C. 284 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1919

So that, upon a fair and proper construction of the verdict, which should be read in the light of the evidence and what presumably was the charge (Southerland v. Brown, 176 N. C., 187 ; Jones v. R. R., 176 N. … Bunn v. Todd, supra, has frequently been approved since it was decided, tbe two most recent cases which expressly endorse its statement of tbe rule and apply it being Brown v. Adams, 174 N. C., 490 , and Pope v.

Riddick v. Gates Cnty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2026

Background Plaintiff has served as Director of the Gates County Board of Elections since  RIDDICK V. GATES CNTY. … The Gates County Board of Elections is an independent board governed by the State Board of Elections. The Board of County Commissioners in each county compensates its county’s Director of Elections.

Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Payne

342 N.C. 825 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1996

Harris, 279 N.C. 288, 297 , 182 S.E.2d 345, 350 (1971) (quoting Foster v. Hyman, 197 N.C. 189, 191 , 148 S.E. 36, 37 (1929)) (emphasis added); see also O.S. Steel Erectors v. Brooks, 84 N.C. … Brooks v. Ansco & Assoc., 114 N.C.

State v. Holston

134 N.C. App. 599 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 1999

On the day in question, Brown showed up at their house with four other friends. … After an initial conversation, Brown and Defendant walked alone to the street. Defendant then shot Brown five times and claims the shooting was in self defense.

State v. Riley

159 N.C. App. 546 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2003

In State v. Holbrook, 137 N.C. … V.

Nichols v. . Bell

46 N.C. 32 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1853

This objection-is answered by the .cases of Miller v. Irwin, 1st Dev. and Bat. 103. Cooper v. Chambers, 4 Dev. 281 . Adcock v. Fleming, 2 Dev. & Bat. 223 . Ashford v. Robinson, 8 Ired. 116 . 3 Kent’s Com. 122. … Here the plaintiff is described, as being neither black nor white, but of a brown color, between that of an African and a mulatto.

Matter of Elkins

308 N.C. 317 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1983

Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E. 2d 538, 541 (1977); see also Baker v. Varser, 240 N.C. 260 , 82 S.E. 2d 90 (1954). … Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98 , 225 S.E. 2d 816 (1976). However, the rules of evidence before an administrative board permit more latitude than is allowed in court proceedings. Campbell v.