Case law

Ferris v. N.C. Bd. of Architecture

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 2024

Background  FERRIS V. N.C. BD. … FERRIS V.

Wirth v. Wirth

193 N.C. App. 657 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 18, 2008

See Allen v. Allen, 168 N.C. … Id.; Brown v. Brown, 112 N.C. App. 15, 19 , 434 S.E.2d 873, 877 (1993). “[A] trial court’s failure to comply with the provisions of the equitable distribution statute constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Pott v.

State v. . Green

95 N.C. 611 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886

To the same effect is State v. Collins, 70 N. C., 241 ; State v. Ellington, 7 Ired., 61 ; State v. Bone, 7 Jones, 121 ; State v Cockerham, 2 Winston, 484. … The last exception was to the ruling of the Court in overruling the challenge of the prisoner to the juror Benjamin Brown.

State v. Holloman.

139 N.C. 642 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1905

Elliott R. & S. (2nd Ed.), sec. 424; State v. Summerfield, 107 N. C., 895 . And its being put into effect can be made dependent upon the action of the board of supervisors. State v. Barringer, 110 N. C., 525 ; State v. … State v. Sharp, 125 N. C., 632, 634 . Under this statute, the State prosecutes for the misdemeanor and the board of supervisors can sue for the penalty. State v. Parker, 91 N. C., 650 ; State v. Bloodworth, 94 N.

United States v. Brooks

221 F. Supp. 852 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 20, 1963

Mills v. United States, 4 Cir., 281 F.2d 736 (1960). … Under these circumstances, the defendant’s motion for a new trial must be denied upon authority of United States v. Johnson, 327 U.S. 106 , 66 S.Ct. 464 , 90 L.Ed. 562 (1946); Jones v.

State v. Woods

109 N.C. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1993

Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of Transp., 303 N.C. 424 , 279 S.E.2d 826 (1981). … In State v. Twitty, 2 N.C. 102 (1794), curtilage was defined as meaning “a piece of ground, either enclosed or not, that is commonly used with the dwelling-house.” See also, State v. Browning, 28 N.C.

State v. Riley

159 N.C. App. 546 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2003

In State v. Holbrook, 137 N.C. … V.

Harden v. City of Raleigh

192 N.C. 395 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 27, 1926

In Rosenthal v. Goldsboro, 149 N. … Parks v. Comrs., 186 N. C., 490 ; Lee v. Waynesville, 184 N. C., 568 ; S. v. Vanhook, 182 N. C., 831 ; Dula v. School Trustees, 177 N. C., 426 ; Rollins v. Winston-Salem, 176 N. C., 411 .

Jerkins v. . Mitchell

57 N.C. 207 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1858

See Walton v. Walton, 14 Ves. Jun. 324; Brown v. Brown, 2 Ired. Eq. 309 . A different rule was laid down by the Supreme Court, under its former organization, in the case of Norwood v. Branch, 2 Car. … That case was, however, brought into doubt by this Court in deciding the above-mentioned case of Brown v. Brown , and was entirely over-ruled in the subsequent one of Johnston v. Johnston, 4 Ired. Eq. 9.

State v. Holston

134 N.C. App. 599 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 1999

On the day in question, Brown showed up at their house with four other friends. … After an initial conversation, Brown and Defendant walked alone to the street. Defendant then shot Brown five times and claims the shooting was in self defense.

Jones v. Cumberland County Brd. of Education

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 22, 2009

Russell v. Lowes , 108 N.C. App. 762 , 425 S.E.2d 454 (1993). *********** Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the undersigned enters the following: AWARD 1.

Langley v. Staley Hosiery Mills Co.

194 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1927

The jury was instructed, in accordance with the rule approved in Brown v. Chemical Co., 162 N. … Morrow v. Mills, 181 N. C., 423 ; Brown v. Chemical Co., supra. But we do not find in the record before us any sufficient evidence of the defendant’s consent to this effect.

State v. Knight

255 N.C. App. 802 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2017

STATE V. … The Board of Education appeals. II.

W. P. Love & Co. v. Young

69 N.C. 65 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1873

v. … The concluding general remarks of Justice Boyden, in Brown v.

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Lenoir County

200 N.C. 494 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1931

R. v. Reid, 187 N. C., 320 ; R. R. v. Forbes, 188 N. C., 151 ; R. R. v. Cherokee County, 195 N. C., 756 . We are not aware of any satisfactory reason why the principle should not apply in the present case. … The appellant cites Armstrong v. Board of Commissioners, 185 N. C., 405 , in support of its position; but that case dealt primarily with Article II, section 29, of the Constitution, and recognized the validity of C.

State v. Coffey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2020

However, to the contrary, Brown is distinguishable. In Brown, - 12 -  STATE V. … Notwithstanding the holding in Brown, the instant case is more analogous to State v.

Laurel Valley Watch, Inc. v. MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES OF WOLF RIDGE, LLC

192 N.C. App. 391 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 2008

(e2) Each decision of the board is subject to review by the superior court by proceedings in the nature of certiorari. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-345 (2005). See, e.g., Riggs v. … In Ward v. New Hanover Cty., 175 N.C.

Henderson v. . McLain

146 N.C. 329 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1907

Dunavant v. Railroad, 122 N. C., 1001 , and cases there cited. The refusal of the Superior Court to set aside the report of a referee on the ground of newly discovered evidence is not reviewable. Vest v. Cooper, 68 N. … Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 , where this section is analyzed. As Avas said in Jones v. Emory, 115 N.

State Ex Rel. Rohrer v. Credle

322 N.C. 522 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1988

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Mississippi, — U.S. —, 98 L.Ed. 2d 877 ; Barney v. Keokuk, 94 U.S. 324 , 24 L.Ed. 224 (1877). In Illinois Cent. R.R. v. … State Board of Agriculture, North Carolina and its Resources, Shellfish, at 151-52 (1896).

Peeler v. . Peeler

109 N.C. 628 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 373 ; Bump, on F. C., pp. 6, 318; Stephenson v. Felton, 106 N. C., 120 ; Osborne v. Wilkes, 108 N. C., 669 ; Woodruff v. Bowles, 104 N. C , 213; Bigelow on Fraud, 136. … Brown v. Mitchell, supra; McLeod v. Bullard, 84 N. C., 515 .