Case law

Wright & Edwards v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

68 O.B.A.J. 915 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1997

Employment Security Commission v. Board of Review, 914 P.2d 1088 (Okla.App.1996). See also, Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Okla. Employment Security Commission, 913 P.2d 1377 (Okla.App.1996). … We held, in Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v.

Opinion No. 76-363 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 25, 1977

Specifically, the payment of money to private organizations has been held to be violative of this constitutional provision, Children's Home and Welfare Association v. … Childers, 197 Okl. 243 , 171 P.2d 613 (1946), and Veterans of Foreign Wars of U.S., Department of Oklahoma v. Childers, 197 Okl. 331 , 171 P.2d 618 (1946).

Wieland v. Gordon (In re Gordon)

509 B.R. 359 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2014

Warren (In re Warren), 512 F.3d 1241, 1248 (10th Cir.2008) (quoting Gullick-son v. Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290, 1292 (10th Cir.1997)). . In re Juzwiak, 89 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir.1996). . § 727(a)(2)(A). . … Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290 , 1293 n. 1 (10th Cir.1997). . In re Carey, 938 F.2d at 1077 . . Strunk, 671 F.2d at 396 . . Standefer v. Standefer, 26 P.3d 104, 108 (Okla.2001).

Shilkett v. State

29 Okla. Crim. 17 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1925

Barmore v. Robertson, 302 Ill. 422 , 134 N. E. 815 , 22 A. L. R. 835. … The statute, by inference at least, gives the state board of health power to make and enforce reasonable regulations ; but there is no allegation in the information that the board of health promulgated any rules relative

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1985

Schooler v. Lisle , 299 S.W.2d 792 (Ky. 1957); Solomon v. North Shore Sanitary District , 269 N.E.2d 457 (Ill. 1971). … In Arthur v.

Fields v. Victor Building & Loan Co.

73 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1918

In the case of Adams v. Burke, 201 Ill. 395 , 66 N. … Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Rogers, 49 Okla. 67 , 148 Pac. 161 ; Burton v. Lithic Mfg. Co., 73 Ore. 605 , 144 Pac. 1151 ; Camden Land Co. v. Lewis, 101 Me. 78 , 63 Atl. 523 .

Opinion No. (1993)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1993

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS RECEIVED YOUR LETTER ASKING, IN EFFECT, THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: MAY THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF REGISTERED DENTISTS (THE "DENTAL BOARD") CEASE THE ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY CERTIFICATES OF ABILITY TO PRACTICE … TRUNK V. HERTZ CORP., 200 N.E.2D 894, 896 (OHIO APP. 1964); WOLVERINE SHOE AND TANNING CORP. V. ALDEN'S. INC., 35 F.R.D. 342 , 343 (W.D. MICH. 1964).

Spellman ex rel. Spellman v. Mount

696 P.2d 510 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1984

In Runyon v. … Ely v. Richard L.

In re Harlin

393 P.3d 202 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2017

Ellington v. Horwitz Enterprises, 2003 OK 37 , 68 P.3d 983 . This Court approves court rules and forms only as a matter of procedure. … See, e.g., Cornett v. Carr, 2013 OK 30, ¶ 13 , 302 P.3d 769, 773 (concluding that Rule 9(a) of the Rules of the District Courts directly conflicted with 12 O.S.

TEXAS COUNTY IRR. & WATER RES. ASSN v. Okl. Water Res. Bd.

803 P.2d 1119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1991

For the earlier appeal see Oklahoma Water Resources Board, v. … See Magnolia Pipeline Company v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, infra note 14, 167 P.2d at 888; Board of Educ., Vici Pub. Schools v. Morris, Okl., 656 P.2d 258, 261 [1983]. [14] Magnolia Pipeline Company v.

Opinion No. 73-141 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1973

The circumstance of an insufficient number of students was presented to the Supreme Court of Oregon in the case of Funston v. District School Board for School District No. 1 in Multnomah County, 278 P. 1075 (1929). … In the recent case of Bruinsma v.

Smith v. State of Oklahoma

452 P.2d 819 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1969

Smith’s brother, whose name was Brown. Then Sorg took the defendant, defendant’s wife, and Brown, first to the Planet Motel, which was full, then to the Holiday Inn. … This Court repeats its finding in Williams v.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1992

ACCORDING TO YOUR LETTER, A NONPROFIT OKLAHOMA CORPORATION HAS ASKED THE OKLAHOMA BOARD OF PRIVATE VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS (BOARD) TO EXEMPT IT FROM THE BOARD'S LICENSING REQUIREMENTS BECAUSE IT IS A TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATION UNDER … V. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, 620 P.2D 452 (OKLA. CT. APP. 1979). STATUTES DEALING WITH THE SAME GENERAL SUBJECT SHOULD BE CONSTRUED TOGETHER IN ORDER TO ARRIVE AT THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT IN ANY PARTICULAR SECTION. TWA V.

Wilkinson v. McGehee

651 P.2d 671 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1982

Loggins v. Wetumka General Hospital, Okl., 587 P.2d 455 (1978); Sooner Const. Co. v. Brown, Okl., 544 P.2d 500 (1975).

Opinion No. 80-196 (1981) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 28, 1981

No. 52 v. Antone, Okl., 384 P.2d 911 (1963), contained the following discussion: "As we pointed out in Gurney v. … Attorney General's Opinion No. 79-060, Gurney v. Ferguson, supra, and Board of Education of Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 52 v.

Voight v. Saunders

206 Okla. 318 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1952

In Makrauer v. Board of Adjustment, City of Tulsa, 200 Okla. 285 , 193 P. 2d 291 , this court was considering similar amendatory, rezoning ordinances of Tulsa. … James, County Treasurer, v. State ex rel. Finney, etc., 160 Okla. 99 , 15 P. 2d 591 ; Foote v. Town of Watonga, 37 Okla. 43 , 130 P. 597 . Affirmed. HALLEY, V. C.

Question Submitted by: Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Zemp Behenna

2026 OK AG 8 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 11, 2026

Deputy Sheriff's F.O.P., Lodge 188 v. Bd. of Cnty. … The Jail Trust is overseen by nine trustees: One Board member, the Oklahoma County Sheriff, one appointee by each of the three Board members, and four appointees chosen by a majority vote of the Board. Id. , art. VII.

Opinion No. 78-210 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 7, 1978

See also Investment and Securities Company v. Robbins, D.C. Wash., 49 F. Supp. 620 ; The Southern Railways Company v. Oklahoma City, 12 Okl. 82 , 69 P. 1050 (1902). … Pell v. Ball, S.C., Spears, EQ. 48, 83; Clark v. Lucas County Board of Review, Iowa, 44 N.W.2d 748 .

Sheridan v. Deep Rock Oil Corporation

201 Okla. 312 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1947

It was 44 inches from the center of this board to the crown of the tank car. … Osborn v. Chickasha Gas & Electric Co., 123 Okla. 198 , 251 P. 480 .

Heenan v. Davis

182 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1938

Livingston v. Brown, 100 Okla. 17 , 227 P. 124 . The testimony of Davis showed that he sought out Sewell and after negotiations obtained the letter or document dated April 19, 1934. … Williams v. Casparis Bros., 113 Okla. 51 , 238 P. 438 . In the absence of fraud or mistake, not pleaded here, Davis by accepting the written contract became bound by its recitals. Brown v.