Case law

State of Tennessee v. Talmadge Hurt

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 20, 2015

He bought the 1998 Mercury Grand Marquis from Charles Brown in 2006. The car was repossessed by Mr. Brown at one point because Defendant failed to make payments. Mr. … State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 549 (Tenn. 1992). A lay opinion should be within the range of knowledge or understanding of ordinary laymen. Boggs, 932 S.W.2d at 474.

DePriest v. Bible

653 S.W.2d 721 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 27, 1980

If, from the facts in the record, reasonable minds could differ as to the cause of the unemployment, then the decision of the Board is final...” Also see Duke v. … While Sherbert v.

Beech, John v. G4S Secure Solutions {USA), Inc.

2021 TN WC 143 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 4, 2021

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). The Court finds he has not carried this burden. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Carter County v. Oliver-Hill Const. Co.

143 Tenn. 649 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1920

Co. v. Crane Co., 219 U. S., 24, 34 , 55 L. … A boarding house might be conducted by the contractor (like some *662 company stores concerning Avhich states have legislated— Keolcee Consol. Coke Co. v. Taylor, 234 U. S., 224 , 58 L. Ed., 1288 , 34 Snp. Ct.

State of Tennessee v. John Allen Hessmer

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 12, 2024

See Carpenter v. State, 136 S.W.3d 608 (Tenn. 2004); Baker v. State, 989 S.W.2d 737 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998); Grant v. State, No. M2007-00052-CCA-R3-PC, 2008 WL 4169985 (Tenn. Crim. App. … State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200, 208-09 (Tenn. 2015). An illegal sentence is defined as “one that is not authorized by the applicable statutes or that directly contravenes an applicable statute.” Tenn. R. Crim.

Ingram, Krystal v. Federal Express Corp.

2025 TN WC 7 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 18, 2025

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2024); Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Federal Express meets this burden, Ms. … Hutchins v. Cardinal Glass Indus., No. E2023-00587-SC- R3-WC, 2024 Tenn. LEXIS 3, at *11 (Jan. 11, 2024). While Ms.

Hammon v. Miller

13 Tenn. App. 458 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 2, 1931

V. … Its charter is set out in chapter 274 of. the Private Acts of 1925, and provides for a Board of Mayor and Aldermen. *460 H. T. V.

Flowers v. Traughber

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 27, 1997

State v. Tester, 879 S.W.2d at 828; Harrison v. Schrader, 569 S.W.2d 822, 825 (Tenn. 1978); San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 16(1973); Baker v. … State v.

State of Tennessee v. Christopher Colligan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 12, 2019

See Tucker v. Morrow, 335 S.W.3d 116, 123 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009), overruled by State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200, 212 (Tenn. 2015). … Although the supreme court in Brown addressed a defendant’s claim for relief under Rule 36.1, the supreme court released State v.

Hunley v. Cohen

288 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 15, 1968

Brown examined his chest, spine, hands and knees. All bone structures were normal and no evidence of arthritis was found. However, Dr. Brown did find arteriosclerosis. Doctor E. K. … Moon v. Celebrezze, 340 F.2d 926 (C.A. 7, 1965); Celebrezze v. Bolas, 316 F.2d 498 (C.A. 8, 1963); Johns v. Celebrezze, 272 F.Supp. 533 (M.D.Tenn., 1967). King v.

State of Tenn. v. Herrington

626 F. Supp. 1345 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 5, 1986

See, e.g., Brown v. Ferro Corp., 763 F.2d 798, 801 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 344 , 88 L.Ed.2d 291 (1985); Johnson v. Sikes, 730 F.2d 644, 648 (11th Cir, 1984). … Atwell v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 670 F.2d 272, 286 (D.C.Cir.1981).

Bernos Coal Co. v. Lujan

739 F. Supp. 1133 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 6, 1989

He also found that the OSM was not privy to the state board’s actions. In the alternative, he held that even if Magistrate Murrian had been correct that these doctrines applied in Excello v. … See U.S. v. Stauffer Chemical Co., 464 U.S. 165 , 104 S.Ct. 575 , 78 L.Ed.2d 388 (1984).

State v. Mitchell

104 Tenn. 336 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1899

Bradley v. Dibbrell, 3 Heis., 522; Hix v. Gosling, 1 Lea, 567 . In Tappan v. … The case of Rogers v. L. & N. R. R. Co. was a suit impeaching the action of a board of directors in leasing a railroad, and the validity of their act was the question to be litigated.

State v. Scott

36 L.R.A. 461 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1897

S., 129 ; Brennan v. Titusville, 153 U. S., 289 ), and a tax. upon their principals would be tantamount to a tax upon the business of those principals (Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat., 444 ; Leloup v. Mobile, 127 U. … Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat., 1 ; Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat., 446 ; Leisy v. Hardin, 135 U. S., 108 .

Jerry Kittrell v. Wilson County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 3, 2011

The Standard of Review The proper method of review of a decision made by a board of zoning appeals, is through a common law writ of certiorari. McCallen v. City of Memphis, 786 S.W.2d 633, 639 (Tenn.1990). … Review under the common law writ of certiorari is generally limited to the record made before the lower tribunal or board. See 27-9-111(b); Jeffries v. Tennessee Dept. of Correction, 108 S.W.3d 862, 877 (Tenn. Ct.

Parker v. Warren County Utility District

2 S.W.3d 170 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1999

Inc. v. Ellerth, 118 S.Ct. 2257 (1998), and Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 118 S.Ct. 2275 (1998). … V. ELLERTH AND FARAGHER V.

Washington v. Ryan

64 Tenn. 622 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

McFaeland, J., dissented as follows: I agree fully in the conclusion, but from so much of the reasoning and comments upon the cases of Brown v. Vanleer, and Green v.

Williams v. Hoffmeister

520 F. Supp. 521 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 23, 1981

Meadows v. Ford Motor Co., 510 F.2d 939 (6th Cir. 1975). Plaintiff relies also on a Fourth Circuit case, E.E.O.C. v. … Gillin v. Federal Paper Board Co., Inc., 479 F.2d 97, 101 (2d Cir. 1973).

Copley v. State

153 Tenn. 189 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1925

S.), 285, and *193 note; State v. Brown, 88 S. E., 21 , 103 S. C., 437, L. R. A. 1916D, 1295, and note, page 1299. In other words, the criminal agency must appear as noted in Ashby v. State, supra. … State v. Brown, 88 S. E., 21 , 103 S. C., 437, L. R. A., 1916 D, 1295.

Ahern v. Ahern

15 S.W.3d 73 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 20, 2000

In Brown v. Latham, this Court 13 distinguished the contempt provisions in Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-9-102 from Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-104(a). Brown, 914 S.W.2d at 889. … Brown, 914 S.W.2d at 888.9 The “offenses” enumerated in Tenn.