Case law

Humphrey v. Brown

17 How. Pr. 481 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1859

Brown v. Starkweather

197 A.D.2d 840 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 1, 1993

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly held that petitioner Brown’s proceeding was not timely commenced. … Respondents Stark-weather and Relin were not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see, CPLR 5511; Town of Massena v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 45 NY2d 482, 488 ).

Soper v. . Brown

136 N.Y. 244 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1892

In Sibley v. … (In re Brown, 93 N. Y. 295 , and cases cited.) The judgment should be affirmed. All concur. Judgment affirmed.

Church v. . Brown

21 N.Y. 315 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1860

This case follows that of Brown v. … That the defendants were neither makers nor indorsers of a promissory note, but that their contract was one of guaranty, had been settled before. ( Spies v. Gilmore, 1 Comst., 321; Brown v. Curtis, 2 Comst., 225.)

Brown v. Feeter

7 Wend. 301 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1831

Bennus v. Guyldley, Cro. … In Scheibel v.

Brown v. Ristich

36 N.Y.2d 183 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1975

Church v. Walsh, 244 N. Y. 280, 287 .) … (Matter of Smart v. Francis, 43 A D 2d 623, revd. 35 N Y 2d 872; Matter of Merchant v. New York State Dept. of Mental Hygiene, 41 A D 2d 588; Matter of Reid v. Greenberg, 40 A D 2d 1078; Matter of Traber v.

Brown v. . Foster

108 N.Y. 387 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1888

(Reed v. Randall, 29 N. Y. 358 ; Beck v. Sheldon, 48 id. 365 ; Dutchess Co. v. Harding, 49 id. 321.) *392 The cases cited by the learned counsel for the appellant have been examined. … (Lillywhite v. Devereux, 15 M. & W. 285.)

Brown v. Poritzky

30 N.Y.2d 289 · New York Court of Appeals · May 3, 1972

The Appellate Division reversed on the law holding that Arkawy’s negligence should not be imputed to Brown so as to bar Brown’s recovery in an action against the defendant and ordered a new trial. … As stated earlier, Brown sold his insurance business to Poritzky and as a condition of the sale, Poritzky was to be the exclusive insurance broker for Brown’s real estate holdings.

People v. Brown

197 A.D.3d 433 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 19, 2021

People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 04737 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 04737 Decided on August 19, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … Ind No. 3350N/13 Appeal No. 11923 Case No. 2015-1114 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tajammal Sharief Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Stephen Chu, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Emma L.

Franklin v. . Brown

118 N.Y. 110 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1889

(Witty v. Matthews, 52 N. Y. 512 ; Jaffe v. Harteau, 56 N. Y. 398 ; Edwands v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co. 98 N. Y. 245 ; Cleves v. Willoughby, 7 Hill, 83 ; Mumford v. Brown, 6 Cow. 475 ; Westlake v. … (Edwards v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co. 98 N. Y. 248 ; Howard v. Doolittle, 3 Duer, 475 ; Carson v. Godley, 26 Penn. St. 117; Dutton v. Gerrish, 9 Cush. 89 ; Chadwick v. Woodward, 13 Abb. [N. C.] 441; Coulson v.

Brown v. Williams

4 Wend. 360 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1830

R. 73. 3 Brown’s C. 3. 11 Ves. 410.) These cases speak of discharging or varying the contract with the principal debtor. … In English v. Darby, (2 Bos. & Pul. 62,) Lord Eldon, speaking of the case of Hayling v. Mulhall, (2 Black.

People v. Brown

95 N.Y.2d 942 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 2000

Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review (see, People v Hallman, 92 NY2d 840 ; People v Cloud, 79 NY2d 786 ; People … v Burr, 70 NY2d 354 ). *944 Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

People v. Brown

32 N.Y.2d 172 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1973

(See People v. Corrado, 22 N Y 2d 308, 311, 313.) For example, the defendant’s answers to the officer’s questions were not evasive or unresponsive. (People v. Rosemond, 26 N Y 2d 101, 102-103, 105; People v. … People v. White, 16 N Y 2d 270). Nor was there any report of a car breakin nor any indication that this was a high crime area. (People v. Hunter, 30 N Y 2d 774, 776.)

Brown v. . Leigh

49 N.Y. 78 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1872

Hollister v. Livingston ( 9 How. Pr. Rep., 140 ); Field v. Morse (8 id., 47); Dows v. Green (3 id., 377) are cases of this class. In other cases (Mason v. Whitely, 4 Duer, 611 ; Prindle v. Aldrich, 13 How. … Co. v. Tibbits, 11 id., 168, and others), it has been held that a new cause of action or defence might be set up.

Clark v. Brown

18 Wend. 115 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1837

(Almy v. Harris, 5 Johns. R. 175. Smith v. Drew, 5 Mass. … (Bush v. Brainard, 1 Cowen’s R. 78. Holladay v. Marsh, 3 Wend. R. 142. Rust v. Low, 6 Mass. R. 94 . Little v. Lathrop, 5 Greenl. R. 356.)

People v. Brown

48 N.Y.2d 921 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1979

The defendant contends that the Trial Judge did not apply the proper criteria with respect to the prosecutor’s right to cross-examine the defendant concerning his prior criminal record (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 ). … In addition, since the exclusion of prior convictions is a discretionary determination for the trial courts and fact-reviewing intermediate appellate courts, no further review by this court is warranted (People v Shields,

People v. Brown

40 N.Y.2d 183 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1976

penal interest (People v Wheatman, supra; see, also, United States v Harris, supra). … , People v Wheatman, 29 NY2d 337 , supra; People v Hanlon, 36 NY2d 549, 558 , supra).

McGregor v. . Brown

10 N.Y. 114 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1854

In the case of Green v. … These rules have been modified to some extent in this state, in reference to wild and uncleared lands leased for agricultural purposes. ( Jackson v. Brownson, 7 John., 227 ; Kidd v. Dennison, 6 Barb., 9 .)

Brown v. . Curtiss

2 N.Y. 225 · New York Court of Appeals · May 5, 1849

Brown's note; and we have no right to turn that contract into one of a different kind. This is so plain a principle that it would seem to be enough to mention it, without saying any thing more. … I have contended earnestly, though not always with success, for this doctrine. ( Seabury v. Hungerford, 2 Hill, 80 ; Miller v. Gaston, id . 188; Manrow v. Durham, 3 id . 587; Leggett v. Raymond, 6 id . 639.)

People v. Brown

145 N.Y.S.3d 805 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 22, 2021

People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 04001 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 04001 Decided on June 22, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … Ind No. 824/18 Appeal No. 14105 Case No. 2019-02627 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rudolph Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Robert S.