Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.53s
690 S.E.2d 693 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 2009
BROWN v. NC DOC, Alvin Keller, as Sec. of DOC, and Kenneth Royster, as Superintendent, Raleigh Correctional Center for Women. No. 517P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 22, 2009. Tiare B. … Petitioner Faye Brown shall file her brief in this Court on or before 31 January 2010. By Order of the Court in Conference, this 22nd day of December, 2009.
Cited 1 timesPublished127 N.C. 562 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1900
We suppose the Solicitor, in making this demand, thought his action was authorized under the opinion in Mott v. Board, 126 N. C., 866 , and that it was the duty of the commissioners to draw and summon this grand jury.
Cited 1 timesPublished241 N.C. 116 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1954
Pridgen, 158 N.C. 337 , 74 S.E. 335 ; Midgett v. Meekins, 160 N.C. 42 , 75 S.E. 728 ; Seawell v. Hall, 185 N.C. 80 , 116 S.E. 189 ; Boyd v. Campbell, 192 N.C. 398 , 135 S.E. 121 ; Jefferson v. … Boyd v. Campbell, supra; Bagwell v. Hines, 187 N.C. 690 , 122 S.E. 659 .
Cited 5 timesPublished267 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1966
State v. Brown, 266 N.C. 55 , 145 S.E. 2d 297 . *191 In our opinion this assignment of error is without merit since the jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment.
Cited 2 timesPublished131 N.C. 264 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 11, 1902
C., 214 ; Summerrow v. Baruch, Ibid., 202; People v. Dye, 75 Cal., 108 ; Hubback v. Ross, 96 Cal., 426 ; Bergtholdt v. Porter, 114 Cal., at page 689; and were therefore properly excluded. … To which Brown made no reply. This is relied upon by plaintiffs as some evidence to show agency, but we do not it does. Brown did not consent to do so.
Cited 3 timesPublished80 N.C. App. 661 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 1986
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Weaver, 310 N.C. 93, 103, 310 S.E. 2d 338, 344 (1984). … Kanoy v. Hinshaw, 273 N.C. 418 , 160 S.E. 2d 296 (1968). Under the circumstances of the instant case we consider Judge Walker’s questions asked of the jury non-prejudicial. See State v.
Cited 4 timesPublished197 N.C. 738 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1929
Jenkins v. Parker, 192 N. C., 188 , 134 S. E., 419 ; Baker v. Edwards, 176 N. C., 229 , 97 S. E., 16 ; Driller Co. v. Worth, 117 N. C., 515 , 23 S. … Power Co. v. Taylor, 194 N. C., 231 , 139 S. E., 381 ; Speas v. Bank, 188 N. C., 524 , 125 S. E., 398 .
Cited 3 timesPublished248 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1958
S. v. Lassiter, 208 N.C. 251 , 179 S.E. 891 . See also S. v. Shew, 194 N.C. 690 , 140 S.E. 621 ; S. v. Barbee, 197 N.C. 248 , 148 S.E. 249 . … S v. Lassiter, supra. Venire de novo.
Cited 3 timesPublished150 N.C. 441 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1909
The words “in an east direction” along the road, should have been “west,” as the plaintiff avers and as is evident' (Wiseman v. Green, 127 N. C., 288 ), but that fact has no bearing on the controversy. … Cullen v. Absher, 119 N. C., 441 .
Cited 2 timesPublished120 N.C. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1995
The facts of this case are set forth in State v. Brown, 116 N.C. App. 445 , 448 S.E.2d 131 (1994). … State v. Corn, 307 N.C. 79, 85 , 296 S.E.2d 261, 266 (1982). N.C. Gen.
Cited 5 timesPublished18 N.C. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1973
Schrecengost that “this man (indicating Brown) to whom I am now taking a look ... is the man that was standing in front of me in Horne’s Motor Lodge on the night of December 25th when I was shot and robbed,” or that defendant … State v. McVay and State v. Simmons, 279 N.C. 428 , 183 S.E. 2d 652 (1971). This assignment of error is overruled.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna