Case law

Titanium Metals Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

392 F.3d 439 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 11, 2005

Freight Sys., Inc. v. … Edison Co. v.

Brown v. Macfarland

22 App. D.C. 412 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1903

Cook v. Board of Police, 39 N. Y. 520 . But no case for the application of the reservation is presented here. … See Brown v. Macfarland, 19 App. D. C. 525; Todd v. Macfarland, 20 App. D. C. 176. — Bepobteb.]

Brown v. District of Columbia

170 A.2d 925 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 19, 1961

But, as we have pointed out in Glenn v. Commissioners of District of Columbia, D. C.Mun.App., 146 A.2d 575, 576 , such a suspension “is not to punish offending drivers but to protect the public.” … See Commonwealth v. Ungar, 190 Pa.Super. 43 , 151 A.2d 782 . It is not unreasonable to require that one whose permit has been lawfully suspended shall take some affirmative action to effect its restoration.

Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP.

267 F. Supp. 2d 61 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2003

Trumbull v. … A (Resume of Patricia Russell Brown).

United States v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 3, 2021

Brown captioned his picture “Boarding LAX.” Id. Flight records confirm that Brown was flying from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C. Id. at 3. … Brown will be detained pending trial. V.

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

627 F.2d 392 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 13, 1980

Board of Trade v. CFTC, No. 77-560, at 4 (D.D.C. Oct. 28, 1977), App. 136, 139. … Ditlow v. Shultz, supra note 22, 170 U.S.App.D.C. at 359-360 , 517 F.2d at 173-174 . 47 . Board of Trade v. CFTC, supra note 4, App. 4, App. 139. 48 . Rural Housing Alliance v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

249 F. Supp. 3d 439 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 2017

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Mpoy v. Fenty, 901 F. Supp. 2d 144, 158 (quoting Brown v. Fogle, 819 F. Supp. 2d 23, 28–29 (D.D.C. 2011)).

Brown v. District of Columbia

888 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 29, 2012

("plaintiff' or "Brown") seeks a preliminary injunction 1 against the University of the District of Columbia David A. … Clarke School of Law ("DCSL"), as well as the University ofthe District of Columbia's ("UDC") Board of Trustees and President Allen L.

Brown v. Robertson

1 Hay. & Haz. 134 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1843

Brown was in the employment of Hon. Daniel Webster, then a •Senator of Congress, at the time of the arrest, the act has uo application to him and affords no justification to the officer making the arrest.

Brown v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.

66 F. Supp. 3d 81 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 3, 2014

Stewart Org., Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29 (1988) (quoting Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612, 622 (1964)). … Id.; see also Kotan v. Pizza Outlet, Inc., 400 F.

District of Columbia v. Brown

739 A.2d 832 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1999

Brown within 30 days of the decision, the OEA Board issued an October 5, 1993 order directing DCPS to submit a written statement concerning the status of the school system’s compliance with the OEA order. … The Board of OEA concluded *838 in Galbreith v. D.C. Public Schools, OEA Dkt No. 2401-0290-81 (1989) that: “[T]he Home Rule Act only protects personnel benefits Employee had on March 2, 1979.

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2025

See Brown v. District of Columbia (“Brown III”), 761 F. … Brown v. District of Columbia (“Brown II”), 928 F.3d 1070, 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2019).

O'Neal's Lessee v. Brown

1 D.C. 69 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802

Brown v. District of Columbia

727 A.2d 865 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1999

See District of Columbia v. Brown, 124 Daily Wash. L. Rptr. 1965 (D.C.Super.Ct. Aug. 27, 1996). … A regulation authorized the Nurses’ Examining Board to issue a license “[u]pon showing of cause satisfactory to it....” Id. (citing 5 DD DCRR § 60.4) (emphasis added).

McNeil v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2018

Cir.); McNeil v. Commissioner, 16-5233 (D.C. Cir.); DePolo v. Ciraolo-Klepper, 16-5308 (D.C. Cir.); Crumpacker v. Ciraolo-Klepper, 17-5054 (D.C. Cir.); McGarvin v. Ryan O. McMonagle, 17-5055 (D.C. Cir.); Podgorny v. … Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 554 (1967) (quoting Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 349 n. 16 (1872)). 8 review the DOJ’s decision to represent Judge Brown.

United States v. Brown

1 D.C. 210 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1804

Brown v. Dist. of Columbia

928 F.3d 1070 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 5, 2019

Brown v. District of Columbia, 322 F.R.D. 51, 61–62 (D.D.C. 2017). … See generally Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition, Brown v. District of Columbia, No. 1:10-cv-02250-ESH (D.D.C. filed Nov. 4, 2016), ECF No. 226.

Freeman v. United States

912 A.2d 1213 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

Brown v. United States, 619 A.2d 1180, 1182 (D.C.1992) (citing cases). … Anderson v.

Brown v. Access Hollywood

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2011

In Neitzke v. … Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). Mindful that a complaint filed by a pro se litigant is held to a less stringent standard than that applied to a formal pleading drafted by a lawyer, see Haz'nes v.

Brown v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2011

Code § 23-110(g); see Williams v. Martinez, 586 F.3d 995, 998 (D.C. … .”); Byrd v. Henderson, 119 F.3d 34, 36-37 (D.C.