Case law

Ecoplexus Inc. v. Cty. of Currituck

257 N.C. App. 9 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 19, 2017

ECOPLEXUS V. … Standard of Review “A legislative body such as the Board, when granting or denying a conditional use permit, sits as a quasi-judicial body.” Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v.

Fraley v. Orange Cnty. Bd. of Elections

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2025

FRALEY, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Defendant. Appeal by Plaintiff from order entered 23 March 2023 by Judge Allen Baddour in Orange County Superior Court. … State v. Lloyd, -3-  FRALEY V. ORANGE CNTY. BD.

Matter of Moore

308 N.C. 771 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1983

Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 83 L.Ed. 126, 140 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 (1938); accord, Commissioner of Insurance v. … In re Elkins, — N.C. —, 302 S.E. 2d 215 (1983); Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977).

In Re Will of Williams

215 N.C. 259 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1939

Marr v. Marr , 39 Tenn. 306 . . . . Ashe, J. , in Brown v. Eaton , 91 N.C. p. 30 , said: `Where a person has two or more depositories of his valuable papers and effects, the finding in either will suffice. … Winstead v. Bowman , 68 N.C. 170 .' Hill v. Bell , 61 N.C. 122 ; Hughes v. Smith , 64 N.C. 493 ; Cornelius v. Brawley , 109 N.C. 542 ; In re Sheppard's Will , 128 N.C. 54 ; Harper v. Harper , 148 N.C. 453 ."

In Re Roberts

150 N.C. App. 86 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2002

Warren County Bd. of Educ. v. Wilkinson, 500 So.2d 455, 459 (Miss. 1986) (citing Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 217 , 72 L. Ed. 2d 786 (1982); Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 500 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 884 (1954); Pierce v. … See Givens v. Poe, 346 F.

Taylor Home of Charlotte Inc. v. City of Charlotte

116 N.C. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1994

Plaintiff’s remaining arguments concern the merits of the Board’s decision to rescind the building permit. The Board’s hearing on the matter was conducted as a quasi-judicial proceeding, see County of Lancaster, S.C. v. … It is the duty of a board of adjustment to interpret a local ordinance and to apply that interpretation to the facts before the board. Midgette v. Pate, 94 N.C. App. 498, 502 , 380 S.E.2d 572, 575 (1989).

State v. . Lawrence

213 N.C. 674 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1938

In S. v. … Coble v. Comrs. , 184 N.C. 342 ; Gunter v. Sanford , 186 N.C. 452 ; S. v. Yarboro , 194 N.C. 498 ; Plott v. Ferguson , 202 N.C. 446 ; Glenn v. Board of Education , 210 N.C. 525 .

State v. Nixon

117 N.C. App. 141 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1994

State v. Lynch, 327 N.C. 210, 224 , 393 S.E.2d 811, 819 (1990). … See State v. Patterson, 335 N.C. 437 , 439 S.E.2d 578 (1994).

Morgan v. . Fraternal Association

170 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1915

WALKER, J., dissenting; BROWN, J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. Civil action to recover on a policy of insurance. … Nicholson v. Lumber Co. , 156 N.C. 59 ; Tuttle v. Raney , 98 N.C. 513 .

State v. Williamson

74 N.C. App. 114 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1985

State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E. 2d 741 (1967). … See State v. Maines, supra. As the District of Columbia Court of Appeals stated in United States v.

Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

207 N.C. 787 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1935

C., 278 , 154 S.E., 604 ; Cogdell v. R. R., 129 N. C., 398 , 40 S. E., 202 . *789 5. That a showing sufficient to support the plaintiff’s claim carries the case to the jury. Brown v. R. R., 195 N. C., 699 , 143 S. … Eller v. R. R., 200 N. C., 527 , 157 S. E., 800 ; Poovey v. Sugar Co., 191 N. C., 722 , 133 S. E., 12 ; Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C., 245 . 7.

State v. Spann

199 N.C. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 1, 2009

State v. Chapman, 359 N.C. 328, 374 , 611 S.E.2d 794, 827 (2005). … State v. Frazier, 319 N.C. 388, 390 , 354 S.E.2d 475, 477 (1987).

North Carolina Ex Rel. Stein v. Bowen

2022 NCBC 64 · North Carolina Business Court · Oct 27, 2022

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011).  23. Specific jurisdiction exists when “the controversy arises out of the defendant’s contacts with the forum state.” Tom Togs, Inc. v. … v.

State v. Turner

281 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1972

He had at first asked for a lawyer and had Attorney Brown called, but Attorney Brown was unable to represent him. … These facts do not constitute a voluntary waiver of counsel as this Court construes the requirement in Miranda v. Arizona, supra.

Layman v. Alexander

294 F. Supp. 2d 784 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 21, 2003

See id.; see also Brown v. Gilmore, 278 F.3d 362, 367 (4th Cir.2002). … Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 828 , 114 S.Ct. 1970, 1974 , 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (Eighth Amendment requires provision of medical care to prisoners who require it); Brown v.

Taylor v. Elizabeth City Pasquotank Public School Board of Education

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 12, 2023

She was politically active in the protests surrounding the April 2021 killing of Andrew Brown. On June 4, 2021, plaintiff was frightened to find a black plastic rat on her desk. … Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 283 (1986).

State v. Caraway

175 N.C. App. 795 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2006

Defendant, Spane and Brown got out of the car. The four men then robbed Ben and Buchanan at gunpoint. … State v. Barfield, 127 N.C. App. 399, 401 , 489 S.E.2d 905, 907 (1997) (citing State v. Davis, 101 N.C. App. 409, 411 , 399 S.E.2d 371, 372 (1991)).

Pilley v. Smith

230 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1949

Whitley v. Arenson, 219 N.C. 121 , 12 S.E. 2d 906 . … Brown v. Brown, 168 N.C. 4 , 84 S.E. 25 . The question is now moot.

Inland Bridge Co. v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

30 N.C. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 1, 1976

Construction Co. v. Highway Comm., 28 N.C. App. 593 , 222 S.E. 2d 452 (1976). Moreover, G.S. 136-29 has been interpreted to provide for recovery only within the terms and framework of the contract. Teer Co. v. … Construction Co. v. Highway Comm., 28 N.C. App. at 606-607 , 222 S.E. 2d at 461 .

Lanvale Properties, LLC v. County of Cabarrus

366 N.C. 142 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 24, 2012

(citing Whitfield v. Longest, 28 N.C. (6 Ired.) 268 (1846); Hellen v. Noe, 25 N.C. (3 Ired.) 493 (1843); Shaw v. Kennedy, 4 N.C. (Taylor) 591 (1817)). … In Porsh Builders, Inc. v.