Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

3.32s

  • United States v. Eason Oil Co.

    8 F. Supp. 365 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1934

    Cornell v. Coyne, 192 U. S. 418 , 24 S. Ct. 383 , 48 L. Ed. 504 ; Browning v. Waycross, 233 U. S. 16, 22 , 34 S. Ct. 578 , 58 L. Ed. 828 ; Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. … Chicago Board of Trade v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1995)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1995

    State v. … Under the logic of State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 2003

    See also Udall v. … Hennessey v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 4, 552 P.2d 1141 , 1145 (Okla. 1976). In the exercise of discretion, governing boards are held to the arbitrary and capricious standard. Nixon v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Williamson v. Garrison

    363 P.2d 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1961

    The President of the Fort Gibson Board of Trustees, on behalf of said Board, also consented to the amendments on March 30, 1960, pursuant to Ordinance No. 252A, passed by that Board. … The Attorney General concedes in his brief that our decisions in the cases of Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, Okl., 285 P.2d 1034 ; Morris v. Oklahoma City, Okl., 299 P.2d 131 ; Meder v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 23, 1979

    The basic principle concerning the power of an administrative board to adopt rules and regulations was expressed in W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson Inc. … Agencies may not, by rule making, exceed the scope of their statutory, see Adams v. Professional Practices Commission, 524 P.2d 932 (Okla. 1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Semke v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Motor Vehicle Commission

    465 P.2d 441 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1970

    One Chicago Coin’s Play Boy Marble Board v. State, supra. … Jack Lincoln Shops v. State Dry Cleaner’s Board, supra.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-257 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1976

    Concerning that language of Article XXIII, Section 10, the Court in Coyle v. … It is clear from the foregoing, that the Court in Coyle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Robinson

    56 Okla. Crim. 404 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1935

    Cr. 634 , 185 Pac. 831 ; Browning v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 373 , 239 Pac. 272 ; Ables v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 26 , 247 Pac. 423 ; Neff v. State, 39 Okla. Cr. 133 , 264 Pac. 649 . … Wines v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 450 , 124 Pac. 466 ; Robbins v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 294 , 155 Pac. 491 ; Browning v. State, supra; Stamper v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 324 , 220 Pac. 67 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • HICKMAN v. STATE ex rel. SERVICE OKLAHOMA

    530 P.3d 96 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 2023

    Lowery v. … See Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc ., 1992 OK 72 833 P.2d 1218 Hill v. Board of Education, District I-009, Jones, Oklahoma , 1997 OK 10711 , ¶ 5, 944 P.2d 930 Greenwood Centre, Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fite v. Van Antwerp

    201 Okla. 26 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1948

    In the case of Gypsy Oil Co. v. Marsh, 121 Okla. 135 , 248 P. 329 , the essential elements of equitable estoppel are enumerated in a quotation from Texas Co. v. … Louis Trading Co. et al. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Benedictine Fathers of Sacred Heart Mission

    45 Okla. 358 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1914

    Board of County Com’rs of Kingfisher County v. Guarantee State Bank et at., 27 Okla. 736, 117 Pac. 216 ; State et al. v. Cawthorn’s Estate, 31 Okla. 560 , 122 Pac. 522 ; Asher State Bank v. … Baker v. Newton et al., 22 Okla. 658, 98 Pac. 931 . As was said in that case, no procedure is prescribed by the 'Constitution, nor is it provided upon what conditions the writ shall issue.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1990

    This remedy was addressed by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Adair County Excise Board v. Board of County Commissioners of Adair County, 438 P.2d 484 (Okla. 1968). … Adair County at 488; see also, Tulsa County Excise Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pierce Petroleum Corp. v. Osage Coal Co.

    133 Okla. 130 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1928

    A stipulation was entered into at the trial that appeal to the Supreme Court should be perfected in cause No. 8622, Pierce Petroleum Corporation v.' … State Bank of Cushing v. Buzzard, 73 Okla. 250 , 175 Pac. 750 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX PROTEST OF HARE

    398 P.3d 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 2017

    Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶ 10, 85 P.3d 841, 845-46. Rules of construction are not utilized if the language in a statute is unambiguous. Lang v. … Citationizer: Table of Authority Cite Name Level Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 2004 OK 7, 85 P.3d 841, FANNING v. BROWN Discussed 1996 OK 39, 913 P.2d 1322, 67 OBJ 1043, Globe Life & Accident Insur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Medcalf v. Coleman

    74 O.B.A.J. 1863 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 13, 2003

    The Board of Directors ultimately revoked Medcalfs staff privileges. … Id. at ¶ 24, 545 P.2d at 742 . ¶ 12 Another case we find helpful is Theissen v. Watonga Municipal Hospital Board, 1976 OK 66 , 550 P.2d 938 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hillcrest Medical Center v. Lee

    575 P.2d 971 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1978

    In support of this proposition, Appellant relies on State Board of Public Affairs v. … Director of Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gordon v. Laborers' International Union of North America

    351 F. Supp. 824 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1972

    By letter dated June 29, 1972, from V. W. Reed, Labor Co-Chairman and Paul B. Richards, Management Co-Chairman of the Craft Board, the Chapter was advised that the Board was rejecting the proposed agreement, (Def. … (Parks v. IBEW, supra, 314 F.2d at 906.) See also Ranes v. Office Employees, Local 28, 317 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1963); Dunne v. Hoffa, 231 N.Y.S.2d 352 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1962).

    Reversed on other grounds by Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. v. Laborers International Union of North America, 476 F.2d 1388 (1973)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Anderson

    67 Okla. 61 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1916

    Or as stated in State ex rel. v. Brown et al., 73 N. … In Roach v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-111 (1973) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 1973

    In Allen, et al. v. … Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 287 P. 311 , applies the same rule to public officers generally.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Shawnee v. Hewett

    37 Okla. 125 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1913

    Board Police Com’rs, 58 N. J. Law, 133, 32 Atl. 78 ; Meissner v. Boyle, 20 Utah, 316 , 58 Pac. 1110 ; Heath v. Salt Lake City, 16 Utah, 374 , 52 Pac. 602 ; State v. Police Com’rs, 80 Mo. … Mayor of Birmingham, 103 Ala. 357 , 14 South. 793 ; Phillips v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y., 88 N. Y. 245 ; Boylan v. Board Police Com’rs, 58 N. J. Law. 133, 32 Atl. 78 ; Heath v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.