Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.71s
Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.
162 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1933
The protest is a collateral attack upon a judgment entered in the district court of Lincoln county in the case of Wilson v. Board of Education of the City of Stroud. … AYe think the pleadings and the findings of the district court of Lincoln county in Wilson v. Board of Education of Stroud, Okla., bring it within the rule announced in Re Protest of St.
Cited 3 timesPublished182 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1938
Livingston v. Brown, 100 Okla. 17 , 227 P. 124 . The testimony of Davis showed that he sought out Sewell and after negotiations obtained the letter or document dated April 19, 1934. … Williams v. Casparis Bros., 113 Okla. 51 , 238 P. 438 . In the absence of fraud or mistake, not pleaded here, Davis by accepting the written contract became bound by its recitals. Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 1994
The Board of Regents of Murray State College (the "Board") is created by statute at 70 O.S. 3407 .2. As a statutorily created board, it is subject to the supreme law-making power of the Legislature. Okla. Const. … Article V , Section 36 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedYazel v. William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc.
364 P.3d 1281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2014
of Equalization (Board),. … Jones v. State of Oklahoma ex rel, Office of Juvenile Affairs, see note --, supra; King v. King, 2005 OK 4, 122 , 107 P.3d 570 , Fuller v. Odom, 1987 OK 64 , T4, 741 P.2d 449, 453 ; Darnell v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTRUSTY v. STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
2016 OK 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 2016
Price v. … , or performed by a laboratory that is exempt from the Board rules pursuant to Section 759 of this title. . . . 8 Tapp v.
Cited 1 timesPublished108 Okla. 49 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1923
. & Loan, 61 Okla. 230 , 157 Pac. 366 ; McKee v. Howard, 38 Okla. 422 , 134 Pac. 44 ; McAdams v. Latham, 21 Okla. 511 , 96 Pac. 584 ; Jenkins v. Brown, 46 Okla. 132 , 148 Pac. 697 . … In the case of Chivers v. Board of Com’rs of Johnston Co., 62 Okla. 2 , 161 Pac. 822 , this court distinguished that case from the case of Town of Byars v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1978
Johnson v. Ward, 541 P.2d 182 (Okl., 1975). A plain reading of these statutes reveals that the district attorney can give opinions, advice, and provide defense services only to county officers and employees. … In an analogous case, Board of County Commissioners v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1985
Schooler v. Lisle , 299 S.W.2d 792 (Ky. 1957); Solomon v. North Shore Sanitary District , 269 N.E.2d 457 (Ill. 1971). … In Arthur v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 2004
of Examiners in Optometry ("Board"). … State Bd. of Embalmers Funeral Dir. v. Guardian Funeral Home, 429 P.2d 732 , 736 (Okla. 1967) (quoting Moore v.
Cited 0 timesPublished651 P.2d 671 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1982
Loggins v. Wetumka General Hospital, Okl., 587 P.2d 455 (1978); Sooner Const. Co. v. Brown, Okl., 544 P.2d 500 (1975).
Cited 5 timesPublished78 Okla. Crim. 45 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1943
That it was on the drain board of the sink. … Cr. 203 , 93 P. 2d 549 ; Nott v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 432 , 107 P. 2d 366 ; Mitchell v. State, 73 Okla. Cr. 184 , 119 P. 2d 99 ; Sims v. State, 73 Okla. Cr. 321 , 121 P. 2d 317 ; Brown v. State, 74 Okla.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 2000
Macy v. Freeman, 814 P.2d 147 , 153 (Okla. 1991). Thus, the statute itself dictates that the sheriff serve not merely on the board, but as its chair. … Morrison v. Ardmore Industrial Development Corp., Okl., 444 P.2d 816 (1963). Morrison, supra, cited an earlier decision of this Court (Woodward v.
Cited 0 timesPublished327 P.2d 655 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1958
We held in Key County Election Board of Oklahoma County v. … In Roberts Board of Commissioners of Craig County v.
Cited 23 timesPublished604 P.2d 844 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1979
Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) where the United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded the action of the Supreme Court of New Mexico in Schware v. … Board of Bar Examiners, 60 N.M. 304 , 291 P.2d 607 (1955).
Cited 17 timesPublished70 Okla. Crim. 228 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1940
Lee v. State, 67 Okla. Cr. 283 , 94 P. 2d 5 ; Pulliam v. State, 61 Okla. Cr. 18 , 65 P. 2d 426 ; Adams v. State, 62 Okla. Cr. 167 , 70 P. 2d 821 ; Russell v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 164 , 194 P. 242 ; Williams v. … Ann. § 1066; Merritt v. State, 55 Okla. Cr. 87 , 25 P. 2d 340 ; Anthony v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 494 , 159 P. 934 ; Fritz v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 342 , 128 P. 170 .
Cited 33 timesPublishedTEXAS COUNTY IRR. & WATER RES. ASSN v. Okl. Water Res. Bd.
803 P.2d 1119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1991
For the earlier appeal see Oklahoma Water Resources Board, v. … See Magnolia Pipeline Company v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, infra note 14, 167 P.2d at 888; Board of Educ., Vici Pub. Schools v. Morris, Okl., 656 P.2d 258, 261 [1983]. [14] Magnolia Pipeline Company v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 1971
BOARD OF LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO REGULATE EXPENSES PAID MEMBERS OF LEGISLATURE The Board of Legislative Compensation does not have authority under Article V , Section 21 , Oklahoma Constitution, to fix … The Board on Legislative Compensation is created in Article V , Section 21 , Oklahoma Constitution. The Board is empowered to review and change the compensation of the members of the Legislature.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 5, 1979
United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520 , 81 S.Ct. 294 (1961), 5 L.Ed. 268 ; Youngblood v. Consolidated School District No. 3, Payne County, 104 Okl. 235 , 230 P. 910 (1924); Stigall v. … by a board member's employer where the board member has a direct or indirect interest in the contract.
Cited 0 timesPublished761 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1991
Board of Educ. v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 864 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982); United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654 , 82 S.Ct. 993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).
Cited 9 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 5, 2006
In Board of Commissioners v. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna