Case law

State v. . Baskerville

141 N.C. 811 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1906

jurisdiction as follows: *Page 618 ( a ) Exclusive original jurisdiction over all offenses arising from the violation of the provisions of this act, or of all violations of ordinances, by-laws, rules, and regulations of the board … Brown , 159 N.C. 469 ; S. v. Dunlap, ib. , 493; S. v. Lawing , 164 N.C. 497 ; S. v. Tate , 169 N.C. 374 ; Oil Co. v. Grocery Co., ib. , 522; Faison v. Comrs. , 171 N.C. 415 ; S. v. Boyd , 175 N.C. 792 . *Page 623 (820)

Smith v. Beasley

298 N.C. 798 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1979

Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co., 268 N.C. 23 , 149 S.E. 2d 625 (1966). Where facts are stipulated, they are deemed established as fully as if deter *801 mined by jury verdict. Moore v. … Koury v. Follo, 272 N.C. 366 , 158 S.E. 2d 548 (1968). In weighing the credibility of the testimony, the jury has the right to believe any part or none of it. Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485 , 141 S.E. 2d 875 (1965).

County of Lancaster v. Mecklenburg County

334 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1993

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E.2d 129 (1974); Jarrell v. Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476 , 128 S.E.2d 879 (1963). … Woodhouse v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 211 , 261 S.E.2d 882 (1980); Keiger v. Board of Adjustment, 278 N.C. 17 , 178 S.E.2d 616 (1971); In re Ellis, 277 N.C. 419 , 178 S.E.2d 77 ; Jackson v.

Laurel Valley Watch, Inc. v. MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES OF WOLF RIDGE, LLC

192 N.C. App. 391 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 2008

(e2) Each decision of the board is subject to review by the superior court by proceedings in the nature of certiorari. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-345 (2005). See, e.g., Riggs v. … In Ward v. New Hanover Cty., 175 N.C.

Devore v. Samuel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2022

Root for third-party defendant-appellant Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. DIETZ, Judge.  DEVORE V. … DEVORE V.

State Prison of N. C. v. Day

124 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1899

C., 369 ; Wood v. Bellamy supra; Ward v. Elizabeth City, 121 N. … Wood v. Bellamy and Hoke v. Henderson, supra; Cotton v. Ellis, 52 N. C., 545 .

Deffet Rentals, Inc. v. City of Burlington

27 N.C. App. 361 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1975

See Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 (1946). … See Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974).

Hirschman v. Chatham Cty.

250 N.C. App. 349 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 2016

In Whitson v. Camden County Board of Commissioners, COA12-1282, 2013 WL 3770664, at *1 (N.C. Ct. App. … Caudle v.

State v. Davis

266 N.C. App. 618 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2019

Compare State v. Stowes , 220 N.C. … State v. Smarr , 146 N.C.

Southern Railway Co. v. Cherokee County

195 N.C. 756 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1928

R. v. Comrs., 188 N. C., p. 265; Bond v. Tarboro, 193 N. C., p. 248; Hunt v. Cooper, 194 N. C., 265 . … R. v. Reid, 187 N. C., 320 ; R. R. v. Forbes, 188 N. C., 151 ; Oliver v. Comrs., 194 N. C., 380 .

Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

670 S.E.2d 904 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 9, 2008

670 S.E.2d 904 (2008) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 9, 2008. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Martha P. Brown, Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins.

Johnson v. Thalle Const. Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 30, 2008

Stat. § 97-2 ; Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. 129 N.C. App. 361 (1998). 2. … Stat. § 97-2 (6); Harding v. Thomas Howard Co ., 256 N.C. 427 (1962). *Page 7 3.

Willowmere Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Hous.

250 N.C. App. 292 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2016

Mosler v. … For example, in Beech Mountain Property Owners' Assoc v.

State v. Love

100 N.C. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 1990

State v. Bailey, 89 N.C. … State v. Young, 312 N.C. 669 , 325 S.E.2d 181 (1985). To qualify as an expert, one need not be a specialist or have a license from an examining board or be engaged in any particular profession.

Johnson v. Thalle Construction Company

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 30, 2008

Stat. § 97-2 ; Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. 129 N.C. App. 361 (1998). 2. … Stat. § 97-2 (6); Harding v. Thomas Howard Co. , 256 N.C. 427 (1962). *Page 7 3.

Chapel Hill Title & Abstract Co. v. Town of Chapel Hill

190 N.C. App. 487 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 2008

In Donnelly v. Board of Adjustment of the Village of Pinehurst, 99 N.C. … See also Helms v.

Flowerree v. City of Concord

93 N.C. App. 483 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1989

See Southern Equipment Co. v. Winstead, 80 N.C. App. 526 , 342 S.E. 2d 524 (1986). … Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v.

Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Martin

203 N.C. 620 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 30, 1932

In Lee and others v. … In Chamberlain v.

In Re Reassignment of Hayes

261 N.C. 616 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1964

This means that the court must hear or try the case on its merits from beginning to end as if no trial or hearing had been held by the Board and without any presumption in favor of the Board’s decision.” Hiner v. … Utilities Comm. v. Trucking Co., 223 N.C. 687 , 28 S.E. 2d 201 .

Federowicz v. N.C. Bd. of Chiropractic Exam'rs

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 20, 2024

V. … - 17 -  FEDEROWICZ V.