Case law

Kamp v. Brookshire

21 N.C. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1974

Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources

37 N.C. App. 86 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1978

Board of Education v. Lamm, 6 N.C. App. 656 , 171 S.E. 2d 48 (1969), affirmed 276 N.C. 487 , 173 S.E. 2d 281 (1970). … See, e.g., Turner v. Board of Education, 250 N.C. 456 , 109 S.E. 2d 211 (1959). The Court has discussed the importance of the element of control. In Turner v.

In re Will of Jenkins

157 N.C. 429 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1911

Browning, wife of Levi Browning, who seem to have had the best claim upon his bounty, and appointed as his executor Hon. E. L. Travis, who had been his attorney and legal adviser. … Brown v. Eaton, 91 N. C., 26 . We will now proceed to consider the other question, whether the paper was found in a proper place of deposit.

Finch v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NA

156 N.C. App. 343 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 2003

Woodard v. … Testator was a member of the local Wachovia Board of Directors, and trusted Wachovia’s decision-making capabilities.

Allen v. . Carr

210 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1936

Mann v. N. C. State Board of Examiners in Optometry et al., 206 N. C., 853 . The Supreme Court of the United States, in Graves v. State of Minn., 272 U. … S. v. Van Doran, 109 N. C., 864 ; S. v. Call, 121 N. C., 643 ; S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C., 557 (Barber’s Act).

De Luca v. Stein

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 2018

DE LUCA and THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiffs, v. … Vernon, Vernon, -8-  DE LUCA V. STEIN Opinion of the Court Wooten, Brown & Andrews, P.A. v.

Ferris v. N.C. Bd. of Architecture

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 2024

Background  FERRIS V. N.C. BD. … FERRIS V.

Armstrong Ex Rel. Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. Armstrong

235 N.C. 733 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 1952

Brown v. Brown, 195 N.C. 315 , 142 S.E. 4 ; Bolling v. Barbee, 193 N.C. 787 , 138 S.E. 163 ; Darden v. Matthews, 173 N.C. 186 , 91 S.E. 835 . … Hallyburton v. Carson, 86 N.C. 290 ; 57 Am. Jur., Wills, Sec. 608, p. 417. And tbe testator’s intent in making the codicil may be found in tbe codicil itself. Homer v. Brown, 16 U.S. 354 , 14 L. Ed. 970 .

Matter of Trulove

54 N.C. App. 218 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981

Compare Parrish v. Real Estate Licensing Board, 41 N.C. … For example, in State v.

Taylor Home of Charlotte Inc. v. City of Charlotte

116 N.C. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1994

Plaintiff’s remaining arguments concern the merits of the Board’s decision to rescind the building permit. The Board’s hearing on the matter was conducted as a quasi-judicial proceeding, see County of Lancaster, S.C. v. … It is the duty of a board of adjustment to interpret a local ordinance and to apply that interpretation to the facts before the board. Midgette v. Pate, 94 N.C. App. 498, 502 , 380 S.E.2d 572, 575 (1989).

Garrison v. Southern Railway Co.

150 N.C. 575 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1909

We hold that, upon well-settled rules of construction, proper allowance is. made for the difficulties suggested by Judge Brown. In this case the statute is not applied to interstate commerce. The case of Railroad v. … Justice Brown in Railroad v. Illinois, 177 U.

McCormac v. Commissioners of Robeson

90 N.C. 441 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

State v. Jones , 1 Ired., 414 ; Mills v. Williams , 11 Ired., 558 ; Love v. Schenck , 12 Ired., 304 ; Taylor v. Commissioners , 2 Jones' Eq., 141; Manly v. Raleigh , 4 Jones' Eq., 370; Hill v. … Commissioners , 67 N.C. 367 ; Com'rs of Currituck v. Com'rs of Dare , 79 N.C. 565 ; Watson v. Commissioners , 82 N.C. 17 ; Cooley Const. Lim., 191-2-3; 1 Dill. Mun.

Boney-Barnhill v. Nash General Hospital

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 16, 2005

Brown treated plaintiff. 16. Dr. … Brown on September 24, 2002. 23.

State v. Whittle Communications

328 N.C. 456 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1991

Plaintiffs cite Guthrie v. … V, § 2(1). Therefore, we conclude that the contract does not violate article V, § 2(1).

Langley v. Taylor

245 N.C. 59 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1956

Be that as it may, the principle applied in case of Town of Old Fort v. … Old Fort v. Harmon, supra.

Charter Medical, Ltd. v. Zigmed, Inc.

173 N.C. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 2005

Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C.App. 281 , 283, 350 S.E.2d 111 , 113 (1986). … Cameron-Brown, 83 N.C.App. at 284 , 350 S.E.2d at 114 (citing International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 , 66 S.Ct. 154 , 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945)).

Williams v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RALEIGH

595 F. Supp. 2d 627 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 9, 2008

Zinkand v. Brown, 478 F.3d 634, 637 (4th Cir.2007); Bogart v. Chapell, 396 F.3d 548, 555 (4th Cir.2005); Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat’l Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396, 403 (4th Cir.1998). … Bullington v.

James v. New Hanover Regional Medical Center

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 5, 2007

Brown recommended surgery. 6. On June 9, 2004 Dr. Brown operated to decompress the L4-5 and L5-S1 interspaces in plaintiff's back. … Brown for a surgical opinion. 8. Dr. Brown had previously discussed with plaintiff the next surgical option, which would involve a fusion.

Carter v. . R. R.

165 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1914

The Court held, in Browne v. R. … Browne v. R. R. , 108 N.C. 34 ; Hutchison Carriers, sec. 641. In Lambeth v. R.

Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

672 S.E.2d 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 2009

672 S.E.2d 681 (2009) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 3, 2009. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Martha P. Brown, Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins.