Case law

Red Rock Mental Health v. Roberts

940 P.2d 486 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1997

Union Indemnity Co. v. Sating, 166 Okl. 133 , 26 P.2d 217, 226, 228 (1933). See Board of Law Library Trustees v. State, Okl., 825 P.2d 1285, 1291 (1991); Spain v. Kemell, Okl., 672 P.2d 1162, 1164-1165 (1983); Bryan v. … Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., Old., 804 P.2d 1138, 1139 (1991); Brown & Root v. Dunkelberger, 196 Okl. 116 , 162 P.2d 1018, 1020 (1945) (overruled in part on other grounds by Tulsa Hotel v.

State Ex Rel. Dunlop, State Treas. v. Cruce

31 Okla. 486 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1912

The leading case of this class is Sutherland v. Governor, 29 Mich. 320 , 18 Am. Rep. 89 . People ex rel. Broderick v. Morton, 156 N. Y. 136, 50 N. E. 791 , 41 L. R. A. 231, 66 Am. St. … In Betts v.

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1986

Absent a rule setting out the procedure to be used by the Board to change a beneficial use designation to a lower designation because of a mistake, the Board may not make such a change. See, Adams v. … At such time as the Board properly adopts such a rule or regulation, the Board may change a beneficial use designation to a less stringent one to correct a factual error. V .

Starr v. Haygood

54 Okla. 403 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1915

To support the claim that this suit involves the question of the title to land numerous authorities are cited, including Link v. Schlegel, 33 Okla. 458 , 126 Pac. 576 , Northcutt v. … Bastable, 39 Okla. 124 , 134 Pac. 423 , Marshall v. Burden, 25 Okla. 554 , 106 Pac. 846 , and the more recent case of Gross v. Baker, 47 Okla. 361 , 148 Pac. 734 .

Georgia State Savings Ass'n v. Elias

192 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1943

McCarty v. Lumry, 170 Okla. 156 , 38 P. 2d 937 ; Smith v. First National Bank of Chandler, 114 Okla. 293 , 245 P. 653 ; Brown v. Coppadge, 54 Okla. 88 , 153 P. 817 . … Garland v. Frazier, 177 Okla. 493 , 61 P. 2d 188 ; Garrett v. Reinhart, 169 Okla. 249 , 36 P. 2d 884 ; Pierce Oil Corporation v. Myers, 117 Okla. 161 , 245 P. 863 ; Skelly Oil Co. v.

Application of Bd. of Regents, Etc.

595 P.2d 785 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1979

Proceeds from sale of the 1979 Series Bonds is to complete Phase V of the steam and chilled water plant servicing the Health Sciences Center located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. … Phase V consists of expansion and improvement of the system.

Opinion No. 68-282 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 1, 1968

In the case of Benson v. Department of Labor, 180 Wn. 655 , 41 P.2d 404 , the Washington court held that those hired by an authorized agent of the county and compensated by county funds are county employees. … In Chavez v. Sprague, 209 C.A.2d 101, 25 Cal.Rptr. 603 , the California court held that a volunteer member of a county hospital staff is a county employee for the purposes of being immune from suit by indigent patients.

Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 54 of Lincoln Cnty. v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 67 of Payne Cnty.

418 P.3d 693 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 2018

Wyandotte County v. … In Board of Commr's of Carter County v. Joint Sch. Dist.

ADECCO INC. v. Dollar

254 P.3d 729 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 7, 2011

Brown v. Mom's Kitchen, LLC, 2004 OK CIV APP 66, ¶ 11 , 96 P.3d 808, 810 . Pursuant to 85 0.8. … Conaghan v.

Haas v. Holloman

327 P.2d 655 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1958

We held in Key County Election Board of Oklahoma County v. … In Roberts Board of Commissioners of Craig County v.

Blackwell

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Aug 6, 2026

Bailey v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 69 of Canadian Cnty., 896 F.3d 1176, 1181 (10th Cir. 2018). Here, only the second and fourth elements are in dispute. 4 Plaintiff relies on Brown v. … See Brown, 124 F.4th at 1267 (noting the third Garcetti/Pickering element is known as "Pickering balancing"). The second prong favors plaintiff.

Yazel v. William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc.

364 P.3d 1281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2014

of Equalization (Board),. … Jones v. State of Oklahoma ex rel, Office of Juvenile Affairs, see note --, supra; King v. King, 2005 OK 4, 122 , 107 P.3d 570 , Fuller v. Odom, 1987 OK 64 , T4, 741 P.2d 449, 453 ; Darnell v.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

162 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1933

The protest is a collateral attack upon a judgment entered in the district court of Lincoln county in the case of Wilson v. Board of Education of the City of Stroud. … AYe think the pleadings and the findings of the district court of Lincoln county in Wilson v. Board of Education of Stroud, Okla., bring it within the rule announced in Re Protest of St.

Del State Bank v. Salmon

548 P.2d 1024 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1976

The opinion adopts as the rule governing the parties that stated in Knapp v. … The National Life opinion also cites and quotes from Schonwald v.

Burns v. Slater

559 P.2d 428 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1974

The State Election Board is a State agency officially residing in Oklahoma County and any action against the Board must be brought in Okla *429 homa County. See, Department of Corrections v. … In Lubin v. Panish, 415 U.S. 709 , 94 S.Ct. 1315 , 39 L.Ed.2d 702 (1974), a California statute requiring all candidates to pay filing fees was struck down when challenged by an indigent candidate.

Opinion No. 74-235 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1975

In the case of Perma-Stone Oklahoma City Company v. … In the case of Realty Mortgage and Sales Company v.

United States v. Roberson

108 F. Supp. 423 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1952

Estep v. United States, 1945, 327 U.S. 114 , ©6 S.Ct. 423, 90. L.Ed. 507. . … Imbodcn v. United States, 6 'Cir., 1952, 194 F.2d 508 ; Niznik v. United States, 6 Cir., 1949, 173 F.2d 328 , and Id., 6 Cir., 1950, 184 F.2d 972 ; United States v. Stiles, 3 Cir., 1948, 169 F.2d 455 ; United States v.

Opinion No. 75-197 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 1975

Our previous opinion answered your question in the negative and relied upon a recent opinion of the Florida Supreme Court in Canney v. … In State v.

Peerson v. Mitchell

205 Okla. 530 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1950

V., and Hal Peerson were the owners or keepers of a brown and white spotted bird dog which was ill-tempered, mean, vicious, dangerous, and accustomed to attacking people, all of which was known to defendants; that during … Jaco v. Baker, supra; Bank of Williamsville v. Amherst Motor Sales, Inc., supra; Humphreys et al. v. Heller, supra; Beam v. Karaim, supre; Yackel v. Nys, supra. In Jaco v.

Hume v. Wyand

68 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1918

Education, Oklahoma City, v. … An examination of the later case (Smartt, Sheriff, v. Bd. Co.