Case law

State v. . Hicks

143 N.C. 689 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1907

See 'also State v. Norman, 13 N. C., 222 ; State v. Tomlinson, 77 N. C., 528 ; State v. Heaton, 81 N. C., 542 ; State v. Lanier, 38 N. C., 658 ; State v. George, 93 N. C., 567 ; State v. Downs, 116 N. … C., 1064 ; State v. Call, 121 N. C., 649 ; State v. Welch, 129 N. C., 580 ; State v. Blackley, 138 N. C., 622 .

Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Martin

203 N.C. 620 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 30, 1932

In Lee and others v. … In Chamberlain v.

McHugh v. North Carolina Department of Environmental, Health & Natural Resources

126 N.C. App. 469 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 1997

Act-Up Triangle v. Commission for Health Services, 345 N.C. 699, 706 , 483 S.E.2d 388, 392 (1997); Amanini v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 114 N.C. App. 668, 674 , 443 S.E.2d 114, 118 (1994). N.C. Gen. … See Preston v. Thompson, 53 N.C.

Sturm v. Schamens

99 N.C. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1990

See Flaherty v. Hunt, 82 N.C. App. 112 , 345 S.E.2d 426 , review denied, 318 N.C. 505 , 349 S.E.2d 859 (1986). … Brown proceeding. However, this claim is not supported by the record, nor is it sufficient to support a finding of waiver.

Plemmons Ex Rel. Teeter v. City of Gastonia

62 N.C. App. 470 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1983

Wilson v. Dowtin, 215 N.C. 547 , 2 S.E. 2d *473 576 (1939); Boyer v. Agapion, 46 N.C. App. 45 , 264 S.E. 2d 364 (1980). … See, e.g., City of Raleigh v.

State v. Love

100 N.C. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 1990

State v. Bailey, 89 N.C. … State v. Young, 312 N.C. 669 , 325 S.E.2d 181 (1985). To qualify as an expert, one need not be a specialist or have a license from an examining board or be engaged in any particular profession.

B. W. Ballard & Co. v. Johnson

114 N.C. 141 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

C., 48 ) and “ all advancements made and expenses incurred in making and saving said crops ” (Brown v. Brown, 109 N. … This view is assumed to be correct in Thigpen v. Maget, 107 N.

State v. Whittle Communications

328 N.C. 456 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1991

Plaintiffs cite Guthrie v. … V, § 2(1). Therefore, we conclude that the contract does not violate article V, § 2(1).

Kamp v. Brookshire

21 N.C. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1974

Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

672 S.E.2d 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 2009

672 S.E.2d 681 (2009) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 3, 2009. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Martha P. Brown, Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins.

State v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

193 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 7, 2008

Trafalgar House Constr., Inc. v. MSL Enters., Inc., 128 N.C. App. 252, 256 , 494 S.E.2d 613, 616 (1998). See also Brown v. Centex Homes, 171 N.C. … See State v.

State v. McLellan

56 N.C. App. 101 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 1982

E.G., Fairbanks v. Cowan, 551 F. 2d 97 (6th Cir. 1977) (father appointed interpreter of sodomy victim who could only make gutteral sounds); United States v. … Joyner sat in the backseat of the car between McLellan and defendant Brown. Defendants Riggins, Jones, and Williams were in the front seat.

Russ v. Hedgecock

161 N.C. App. 334 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 18, 2003

Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, 322 N.C. 271, 276 , 367 S.E.2d 655, 658 (1988). However, this Court held in Dozier v. Crandall, 105 N.C. … Caldwell v. Deese, 288 N.C. 375, 378 , 218 S.E.2d 379, 381 (1975).

Boney-Barnhill v. Nash General Hospital

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 16, 2005

Brown treated plaintiff. 16. Dr. … Brown on September 24, 2002. 23.

McCormac v. Commissioners of Robeson

90 N.C. 441 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

State v. Jones , 1 Ired., 414 ; Mills v. Williams , 11 Ired., 558 ; Love v. Schenck , 12 Ired., 304 ; Taylor v. Commissioners , 2 Jones' Eq., 141; Manly v. Raleigh , 4 Jones' Eq., 370; Hill v. … Commissioners , 67 N.C. 367 ; Com'rs of Currituck v. Com'rs of Dare , 79 N.C. 565 ; Watson v. Commissioners , 82 N.C. 17 ; Cooley Const. Lim., 191-2-3; 1 Dill. Mun.

McCormick v. . Proctor

217 N.C. 23 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1940

In Paul v. … In Turner v.

State Prison of N. C. v. Day

124 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1899

C., 369 ; Wood v. Bellamy supra; Ward v. Elizabeth City, 121 N. … Wood v. Bellamy and Hoke v. Henderson, supra; Cotton v. Ellis, 52 N. C., 545 .

Four Seasons Management Services, Inc. v. Town of Wrightsville Beach

205 N.C. App. 65 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2010

As in [Convent v. Winston-Salem, 243 N.C. 316 , 90 S.E.2d 879 (1956), and Goforth Properties, Inc. v. Town of Chapel Hill, 71 N.C. … In addition, because “the function of a board of adjustment is to interpret local zoning ordinances[, s]ome deference is given to the board’s interpretation of its own city code.” Tucker v. Mecklenburg Cty.

Greenlee v. Young

2 N.C. 5 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1791

Note -The cases of Brown, Campbell & Co. v. the adm’rs of Craig and Cleary, and Alston v. … In Brittain ex’r of Brown v. Johnston, 1 Dev.

Allen v. . Carr

210 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1936

Mann v. N. C. State Board of Examiners in Optometry et al., 206 N. C., 853 . The Supreme Court of the United States, in Graves v. State of Minn., 272 U. … S. v. Van Doran, 109 N. C., 864 ; S. v. Call, 121 N. C., 643 ; S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C., 557 (Barber’s Act).