Case law

George v. Town of Edenton

294 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1978

Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, supra, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974). … See Williams v. City of San Bruno, 31 Cal. Rptr. 854 (Cal. App. 1963); Johnson v. Board of County Com’rs., 34 Colo.

Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

668 S.E.2d 903 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 2008

668 S.E.2d 903 (2008) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 21, 2008. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Martha P. Brown, Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins.

Towns v. EPES TRANSP.

163 N.C. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 2004

Gillikin v. Burbage, 263 N.C. 317 , 325, 139 S.E.2d 753 , 760 (1965). … See Young v. Hickory Bus.

Wilson v. Hoyle

263 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1964

Jones v. Mathis, 254 N.C. 421, 425 , 119 S.E. 2d 200 , and cases cited. In our view, the record does not support plaintiffs’ contention that Judge Gambill entered judgment on the pleadings. … Bruton v. Light Co., 217 N.C. 1, 7 , 6 S.E. 2d 822 , and cases cited; King v. Neese, 233 N.C. 132, 136 , 63 S.E. 2d 123 , and cases cited; Hayes v. Ricard, 251 N.C. 485, 494 , 112 S.E. 2d 123 ; Bowen v.

McQueen v. Peoples National Bank

111 N.C. 509 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1892

Armfield v. Brown, 70 N. C., 27 ; The Code, § 391. The province of the jury is restricted to passing upon issues of fact raided by the pleadings in the light of the testimony offered. … Armfield v. Brown, supra.

Carlton v. Burke Cty. Bd. of Educ.

262 N.C. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2018

WOOD, Plaintiffs, v. BURKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. … Wood had two school-aged children and was “[v]ery active” in their education. At a Board meeting in January 2011, Wood heard rumors about Stellar closing the schools in Burke County.

Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.

87 N.C. App. 512 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1987

Notwithstanding decisions which have, without discussing whether similar errors resulted in prejudice, treated them as reversible per se-, see, e.g., State v. Stephenson, 218 N.C. 258 , 10 S.E. 2d 819 (1940); Brown v. … State v. Brown, 280 N.C. 588 , 187 S.E. 2d 85 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 121 , 93 S.Ct. 198 (1972); State v. Phillips, 228 N.C. 595 , 46 S.E. 2d 720 (1948); Short v. General Motors Corp., 70 N.C.

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris Inc.

60 F. Supp. 2d 502 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 12, 1999

See Direx Israel, Ltd. v. Breakthrough Med. Corp., 952 F.2d 802, 811 (4th Cir.1991). In Blackwelder Furniture Co. of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Mfg. … See, e.g., Philip Morris Inc. v.

Herring v. . Dixon

122 N.C. 420 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1898

Williams v. Commissioners, 119 N. C., 520 ; Board of Education v. Commissioners, 107 N. C., 110 ; Jones v. Commissioners, Ibid 248; Barksdale v. Commissioners, 93 N. C., 472 ; Cromartie v Commissioners, 87 N. … Broadnax v. Groome, supra; Williams v. Commissioners, supra; Evans v. Commsssioners, supra; Halcombe v. Commissioners, 89 N. C., 346 .

Reynolds Am. Inc. v. Third Motion Equities Master Fund Ltd.

2020 NCBC 35 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 27, 2020

Brown & Williamson Transaction 76. On July 30, 2004, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. … Int’l, Inc. v. Mark Techs. Corp., 342 P.3d 761, 768 (Utah 2014); HMO-W Inc. v. SSM Health Care Sys., 667 N.W.2d 733, 735-36 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003); Brown v. Arp & Hammond Hardware Co., 141 P.3d 673, 677 (Wyo. 2006).

Worley v. Moore

2018 NCBC 113 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 2, 2018

Worley v. Moore, 2018 NCBC 113. … E.g., Griffin v.

Boggan v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.

86 F. Supp. 2d 545 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 18, 2000

Brown v. McLean, 159 F.3d 898, 903 (4th Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 1577 , 143 L.Ed.2d 672 (1999). Indeed, she admits that she declined to do so because of her sister’s illness. … Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); Orsi v.

Application of Rea Construction Company

272 N.C. 715 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1968

Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 . … Lee v. Board of Adjustment, supra.

Van Reypen Associates, Inc. v. Teeter

175 N.C. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 2006

Brown. Mr. Brown, a professional engineer, stated in his affidavit that, after performing forensic mapping and surveys of the damage, based on his professional experience, Mr. … See Venture Properties I v. Anderson, 120 N.C.

Putnam v. Sweep Rite, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 6, 2011

"V. Rights and Duties of Subscriber . . . C. … Brown referred Plaintiff to a specialist in December 2007. 21. Plaintiff continued to treat with Dr. Brown through January 2009 wherein Plaintiff continued to experience severe back pain.

Alexander v. Commissioners of McDowell County

70 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1874

Brown and A. M. Finley be authorized to execute bonds for the amount, and affix the seal of the county, and the bunds so executed shall be valid.” … Campbell v. the city of Kenosha, 5 Wallace, 194, and the cases cited under the head of “ Ketroactive Statutes.” No error. Per Oubiam. Judgment affirmed.

Inland Bridge Co. v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

30 N.C. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 1, 1976

Construction Co. v. Highway Comm., 28 N.C. App. 593 , 222 S.E. 2d 452 (1976). Moreover, G.S. 136-29 has been interpreted to provide for recovery only within the terms and framework of the contract. Teer Co. v. … Construction Co. v. Highway Comm., 28 N.C. App. at 606-607 , 222 S.E. 2d at 461 .

State v. Powell

10 N.C. App. 726 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 12, 1971

In the totality of the arguments before us we are referred to the holdings in State v. Caviness, 7 N.C. App. 541 , 173 S.E. 2d 12 , and State v. King, 6 N.C. … The opinions in State v. Caviness, supra, and State v. King, supra, refer to State v. Mobley, 273 N.C. 471 , 160 S.E. 2d 334 , and the opinion in Mobley refers to State v.

Benzein v. . Robinett

16 N.C. 444 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1830

But if he does not enter for seven, or t\v* nty years, provided the tenant for life 1¡ ves so ionu;, Ire may afterwards, upon the death of the- tenant for lif-, enter by virtue of his remainder, whirl) has fallen into possession … John Brown has a remedy at Law.

Energy Investors Fund, L.P. v. Metric Constructors, Inc.

133 N.C. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1999

Plaintiff also points to Browning v. Levien & Co., 44 N.C. … Browning’s facts differ greatly from the facts of this case, as the partnership in Browning had been dissolved prior to the lawsuit.