Case law

Tennessee Central Railroad v. Campbell

109 Tenn. 655 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1902

Railroad v. Campbell, ante, page 640. … Jackson, 1 Yerg., 294 ; Warner v. *659 State, 13 Lea, 52 ; Johnson v. Harris, 16 Lea, 136 ; State v. Taxing District, 16 Lea, 245 ; Brizendine v. State, 103 Tenn., 677 ( 54 S. W., 982 ).

State of Tennessee v. Antonio Marques Peebles

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 24, 2014

State v. Binette, 33 S.W.3d 215, 217 (Tenn. 2000); State v. Odom, 928 S.W.2d 18, 23 (Tenn. 1996). … See State v. Richards, 286 S.W.3d 873, 880 (Tenn. 2009); see also Ybarra v.

City of Knoxville v. Lively

141 Tenn. 22 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1918

In Foster v. … Chattanooga v. Dowling, 101 Tenn., 343 , 47 S. W., 700 ; Kolb v. Knoxville, 111 Tenn., 311 , 76 S. W., 823 ; Knoxville v. Klasing, 111 Tenn., 134 , 76 S. W., 814 ; City of Nashville v. Mason, 137 Tenn., 169 , 192 S.

Beckler v. State

198 Tenn. 372 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1955

E. 815 ; State v. Mayor, etc., of Jersey City, 1890, 53 N. J. L. 112, 20 A. 829 ; Pollasky v. Schmid, 1901, 128 Mich. 699 , 87 N. W. 1030 , 55 L. R. A. 614. … It then concluded as follows: “We are of opinion, therefore, in this case that the words ‘entire board’ mean all the members of the board in existence, and not all those originally elected.”

State of Tennessee v. Eric Lee Hoosier, Sr.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 29, 2024

(citing Sneed v. Board of Prof’l Responsibility, 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). … App. 1990) (citing State v. Brown, 551 S.W.2d 329, 331 (Tenn. 1977); Farmer v. State, 343 S.W.2d 895, 897 (Tenn. 1961)).

Totton v. Local 43 of United Ass'n

293 F. Supp. 673 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 13, 1966

In the case of United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. … United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. American Mfg. Co., 363 U.S. 565 , 80 S.Ct. 1343 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1403 ; United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., supra; and United Steel Workers of America v.

Wilson, Derrick v. Randstad, Inc.

2022 TN WC 57 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 9, 2022

The Appeals Board has long held that a lack of medical evidence regarding causation does not necessarily eliminate the employer’s obligation to provide a physician panel. Lewis v. Molly Maid, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Appeals Board distinguished the case from Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Com’ty Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

United States v. Bell

81 F. 830 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · Jun 10, 1897

In the case of Brown v. … S. v. Brown. 1 Sawy. 531 , Fed. Cas. No. 14,671. And in State v.

Weatherly v. State

704 S.W.2d 730 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 30, 1985

The board upheld the revocation of petitioner’s parole. … Morrissey v. Brewer, supra.

State Ex Rel. Turner v. Gore

180 Tenn. 333 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1943

People v. Connors, supra. … People v. Lewis, supra. In People v. Conson, 72 Cal.

Linda G. Johnson v. Mark Reineke

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 25, 2004

See, Cawthron v. Scott, 400 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Tenn. 1966). V. … In Weaver v.

Treadway, Brian v. Kenneth Carr

2024 TN WC 88 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 11, 2024

Code Ann. § 20-16- 101; see also Rye v. Women's Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). Here, Carr Brothers submitted affirmative evidence that Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

McGauvran, James v. ATOS Syntel, Inc.

2021 TN WC 153 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 5, 2021

Jacobs v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 4, at *9 (Feb. 7, 2018). … The Appeals Board has held that “a decision to award attorneys’ fees and expenses at an interlocutory stage of a case should be made only in extremely limited circumstances.” Travis v. Carter Express, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp.

Franklin v. Collins Chapel Connectional Hospital

696 S.W.2d 16 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 24, 1985

In support of its second ground for opposition to the application of this rule, defendant relies upon the case of Brown v. … See Summit Hill Associates v. Knoxville Utilities Board, 667 S.W.2d 91 (Tenn.Ct.App.1983) cert. denied (1984). II. EXCLUSION OF EXPERT TESTIMONY.

State of Tennessee v. Jerome Wall

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 18, 2017

Hickman v. State, 153 S.W.3d 16, 19 (Tenn. 2004). … Brown, 479 S.W.3d at 205.

Farnsworth & Chambers Co. v. Local Union 429, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

201 Tenn. 329 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1957

Allen-Bradley Local U.E.R.M.W. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 315 U.S. 740 , 62 S.Ct. 820 . … In the case of Bethlehem Steel Company et al. v. New York Labor Relations Board et al., 330 U.S. 767 , 67 S.Ct. 1026, 1020 , 91 *336 L.Ed. 1234, 1245 , Mr.

Polk, Cornelius v. Sundowner Mgmt. Group

2019 TN WC 133 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 6, 2019

The Appeals Board addressed this presumption in Morgan v. Macy’s, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39 (Aug. 31, 2016). … See Andrews v. Yates Servs., LLC, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 35, at *7-8 (May 23, 2017). Mr.

State of Tennessee v. Mustapha Boutchiche

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 12, 2009

The excluded evidence in State v. Brown, 29 S.W.3d 427, 434 (Tenn. 2000), was also unquestionably relevant to the defense. … Id. at 170; see also State v. Brown, 823 S.W.2d 576, 583 (Tenn. Crim.

TOWNSEND, CARLOS v. HENDRICKSON USA, LLC

2025 TN WC 43 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 14, 2025

The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

State v. Simpson

198 Tenn. 695 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1955

W. (2d) 480, 482 ; Douglas v. Pittman, 239 Ky. 548 , 39 S. W. (2d) 979 ; and that is true even where there remains in office only one member, which is our exact situation in the present case. Barton v. … Glass v. Hopkinsville, 225 Ky. 428 , 9 S. W. (2d) 117 . In Note 87 to the text in C. J. S., the Missouri case of State ex rel. Thurlo v. Harper, 336 Mo. 717 , 80 S.