Case law

Surratt v. Brown

2015 NCBC 72 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 27, 2015

Surratt v. Brown, 2015 NCBC 72. … The conversion claim is then limited to Brown, and to the extent Plaintiff asserts a conversion claim against the Moving Entity Defendants, any such claim is DISMISSED. v.

State v. Brown

184 N.C. App. 758 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 2007

State v. Brown

361 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2007

State v. Brown

87 N.C. App. 13 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 1, 1987

State v. Smith, 300 N.C. 71, 78 , 265 S.E. 2d 164, 169 (1980). State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E. 2d 585, 587 (1984). … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. at 566 , 313 S.E. 2d at 587 . We further hold, following State v.

Brown v. Hale

259 N.C. 480 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1963

Schiele v. Ins. Co., 171 N.C. 426 , 88 S.E. 764 ; English v. English, 87 N.C. 497 ; Norton v. McLaurin, 125 N.C. 185 , 34 S.E. 269 ; Mann v. Hall, 163 N.C. 50 , 79 S.E. 437 .” In Bierson v. … Moore v. Deal, supra; Jones v. Ice & Fuel Co., supra.

Brown v. . McLean

217 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1940

Creecy v. Pearce, 69 N. C., 67 ; Caroon v. Cooper, 63 N. C., 387 ; Smith v. Gilmer, 64 N. C., 546 ; Chemical Co. v. Walston, supra. … Purvis v. Carstaphan, 73 N. C., 575 ; Gwathmey v. Pearce, 74 N. C., 398 ; Trust Co. v. Benbow, 135 N. C., 303 ; Gore v. Townsend, 105 N. C., 232 ; Chemical Co. v. Walston, supra.

Jimenez v. Brown

131 N.C. App. 818 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1998

Brown” and listing defendant’s post office box. … Copeland Glass, 601 So. 2d 414 (Ala. 1992); Hayden v. Gardner, 381 S.W.2d 752 (Ark 1964); Miller v. Clayco State Bank, 708 P.2d 997 (Kan. App. 1985); Delta Fertilizer, Inc. v.

Swann v. . Brown

51 N.C. 150 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1858

King, 3 Jones’ Rep. 45; Heathcock v. Pennington, 11 Ire. Rep. 640; Couch v. Jones, 5 Jones’ Rep. 402. … PeR Cueiam, v Judgment reversed.

Matthews v. Brown

62 N.C. App. 559 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1983

Brown, the second deed extending the term of contract set out in the first. Brown assigned the two deeds to Georgia-Pacific Corporation. … In addition, Georgia-Pacific Corporation counterclaimed against Brown, charging liability based on warranty of title.

State v. Brown

185 N.C. App. 544 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 21, 2007

State v. Brown

361 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 2007

Blue v. . Brown

178 N.C. 334 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1919

Brown claims red A to be the beginning corner; I don’t understand the map. Mr. Smith’s fence was directly on the line when Mr. Brown bought the land. That is where the surveyors run. … I do not know when the Browns began to claim that black E was not the right corner.” W. A. Smith: I know the land in dispute in this action. I owned the land at one time claimed, by the Browns.

State v. Brown

361 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 27, 2007

Brown v. . Morisey

124 N.C. 292 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1899

Norwood v. Morrow , 20 N.C. 448 . … McCormick v. Monroe , 46 N.C. 13 .

State v. Brown

640 S.E.2d 448 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 26, 2007

640 S.E.2d 448 (2007) STATE v. BROWN. No. COA06-891. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed February 6, 2007. Certification Date February 26, 2007. Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.

Brown v. NC DOC

690 S.E.2d 693 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 2009

BROWN v. NC DOC, Alvin Keller, as Sec. of DOC, and Kenneth Royster, as Superintendent, Raleigh Correctional Center for Women. No. 517P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 22, 2009. Tiare B. … Petitioner Faye Brown shall file her brief in this Court on or before 31 January 2010. By Order of the Court in Conference, this 22nd day of December, 2009.

State v. Brown.

127 N.C. 562 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1900

We suppose the Solicitor, in making this demand, thought his action was authorized under the opinion in Mott v. Board, 126 N. C., 866 , and that it was the duty of the commissioners to draw and summon this grand jury.

State v. Brown

641 S.E.2d 416 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2007

Houston v. . Brown

52 N.C. 161 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1859

Davis v. Brown

241 N.C. 116 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1954

Pridgen, 158 N.C. 337 , 74 S.E. 335 ; Midgett v. Meekins, 160 N.C. 42 , 75 S.E. 728 ; Seawell v. Hall, 185 N.C. 80 , 116 S.E. 189 ; Boyd v. Campbell, 192 N.C. 398 , 135 S.E. 121 ; Jefferson v. … Boyd v. Campbell, supra; Bagwell v. Hines, 187 N.C. 690 , 122 S.E. 659 .