Case law

Brown v. Hight

33 App. D.C. 260 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1909

The defendant Brown and the intervener Mercer in their answers tender themselves as ready and willing to pay said sum upon the order of the court, and we think it was *268 error for the trial court not to direct complainant

Coe v. Brown

44 App. D.C. 455 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1916

Brown, on the following counts: “1.

Brown v. Hardy

510 F.2d 223 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1975

510 F.2d 223 166 U.S.App.D.C. 270 Brown v. Hardy No. 74-1430 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 2/28/75 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

McNeil v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 2019

BACKGROUND The Court has previously described the facts of this case, see McNeil v. Brown, No. 17- cv-2602, 2018 WL 4623057, at *1 (D.D.C. … Slate v. Am. Broad. Cos., Inc., 12 F.

United States v. Brown

503 F. Supp. 2d 217 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2007

United States v. Reed, 639 F.2d 896, 904 (2d Cir.1981). … BROWN and MILAGROS L. MORALES caused Witness B to provide material and untruthful information about the Club U matter. 3 . Defs.' Mem. to Dismiss at 8 n. 2 (citing United States v.

Stephanie Brown v. Allen Sessoms

774 F.3d 1016 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 2014

Dissatisfied, Brown sued the Board of Trustees of UDC (Board) and Sessoms (collectively, UDC defendants). She alleged one federal claim and six local-law claims. … This language makes clear that the Board is not required to review Brown’s tenure application.

United States v. Brown

504 F.3d 99 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 2007

As additional support for this argument, Brown cites Bartak v. … Brown cites two Eleventh Circuit cases as support for his argument. In United States v.

ITT Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

251 F.3d 995 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 2001

NLRB v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105, 112 (1956); see also Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, 502 U.S. 527, 534 (1992); Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hosp. at Stanford v. NLRB, 97 F.3d 583, 587 (D.C. Cir. 1996). … of the hospital"); NLRB v.

Brown v. Carter

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 7, 2018

Brown, 2015 WL 4450109, at *1; see id. at 2 (noting that “[t]his suit is the latest iteration of plaintiff’s quest for the return of the $2,727.00”); Brown v. … (citing Brown v. Dep’t of the Navy, No. 86-1582 (D.D.C. Aug. 11, 2003)).

Proctor v. Hackers' Board

268 A.2d 267 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1970

Ritter v. City of Pontiac, 276 Mich. 416 , 267 N.W. 641, 643 (1936). See Czarra v. … Doubt about the validity of delegating to the Hackers’ Board authority to enforce this broadly-worded statute has previously been expressed. Frazier v. Silver, 186 F.Supp. 625 (D.D.C.1960). Contra, Green v.

Brown v. Bureau of Prisons

498 F. Supp. 2d 298 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2007

See White v. … See Preiser v.

Brown v. Marsh

711 F.2d 419 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 23, 1983

711 F.2d 419 229 U.S.App.D.C. 141 Brown v.

Rocha v. Brown & Gould, LLP

61 F. Supp. 3d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2014

.: 8, 10 : BROWN & GOULD, LLP, : DANIEL A. BROWN, and : DAVID M. … The next day, defendants Brown & Gould and Daniel Brown were served with the Superior Court summons, complaint, and initial order and addendum.

United States v. James Brown, A/K/A Steven Brown

16 F.3d 423 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 29, 1994

United States v. … V.

Brown v. United States

13 F.2d 298 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 10, 1926

Those statements were signed by the defendants, with the exception of Blanche Brown, who, while admitting the truthfulness of her statement, declined to sign, saying: “No; I never sign any statement in the station house. … There was neither inducement to nor coercion of the defendants, within the meaning of the rule laid down in Bram v. United States, 168 U. S. 532 , 18 S. Ct. 183 , 42 L. Ed. 568 , Ziang Sung Wan v. United States, 266 U.

Szymkowicz v. President and Directors of the College of Georgetown University

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2025

Hedgepeth v. … Ass’n v. D.C.

United States v. Brown

597 F.3d 399 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 5, 2010

The district court denied Brown’s motion for a new trial. *404 United States v. Brown, 535 F.Supp.2d 80 (D.D.C.2008). II. Brown’s challenge to his conviction focuses on two rules of evidence. … Each addresses Brown’s concern, acknowledged by this court in United States v.

Rousseau v. Brown

21 App. D.C. 73 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1903

Brown, filed September 8, 1900. … Boral and Kymer v. Ecob, 97 O.

Rocha v. Brown & Gould, LLP

101 F. Supp. 3d 52 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2015

See COMPTEL v. FCC, 945 F. … Rocha cites Hedgepeth v.

Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP.

267 F. Supp. 2d 61 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2003

Trumbull v. … A (Resume of Patricia Russell Brown).