Case law

Overby v. Fayetteville Building & Loan Ass'n

81 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

Smith v. Brown, 3 Hawks, 580 ; Brown v. Brooks, 7 Jones, 93 ; Wilson v. Derr, 69 N. C., 137 ; Reynolds v. Magness, 2 Ire., 26. 7. … Indeed, it may be questioned, as the correctness of the opinion in Armfield v. Brown, 70 N.

Stancil v. Stancil

255 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1961

Holden v. Holden, supra; Stanley v. Stanley, 226 N.C. 129 , 37 S.E. 2d 118 ; Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556 , 31 S.E. 2d 529 ; Davis v. Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 . … Dyer v. Dyer, 212 N.C. 620 , 194 S.E. 278 ; Davis v. Davis, supra; Edmundson v. Edmundson, 222 N.C. 181 , 22 S.E. 2d 576 ; Smith v. Smith, 247 N.C. 223 , 100 S.E. 2d 370 . It will be noted in Davis v.

Lewis v. . Archbell

199 N.C. 205 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1930

The Defiance

3 F.2d 48 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 1924

were otherwise and the evidence admissible, the mere opinion of one or the other of the parties that a maritime lion existed would not of itself create one, for as was said by the Supreme Court in Piedmont, etc., Coal Co. v. … The rule applicable under such circumstances is that announced by Judge Brown in The Vigilancia (D. C.) 58 F. 698 .

Brooks v. Rebarco, Inc.

91 N.C. App. 459 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1988

Brooks, Comr. of Labor v. … Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). The “whole record” test is also applied when the court considers whether an agency decision is arbitrary and capricious. High Rock Lake Assoc. v.

Copper ex rel. Copper v. Denlinger

363 N.C. 784 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 2010

See Corum v. … But see Patsy v. Bd. of Regents, 457 U.S. 496, 516 , 73 L.

Crowe v. Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, Inc.

442 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 2, 1977

As a result the Council voted to set up a Board of Elections and to place this responsibility with such body. The Court will first consider the jurisdictional question. In Crowe v. … White Eagle v. One Feather, 478 F.2d 1311 (8th Cir. 1973); Daly v. United States, 483 F.2d 700 (8th Cir. 1973), and Brown v. United States, 486 F.2d 658 (8th Cir. 1973).

Tierney v. Reed Lallier Chevrolet

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 16, 2008

The video shows plaintiff performing some limited tasks outside his son's business, such as lifting a screen printing board up in the air to look for imperfections and pulling pieces of masking tape off screen printing boards … Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , 124 N.C. App. 320 , 329 , 477 S.E.2d 197 , 2002 (1996).

French v. . Commissioners of New Hanover

74 N.C. 692 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

The power of the Board is express and plenary. … If there is a surplus, after discharging the claim of $16,500, the Board cannot appropriate it to their own, or to other uses than the payment of the bonded debt.

Atkins v. . McAden

229 N.C. 752 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1949

Johnson v. Marrow, 228 N. C. 58 , 44 S. E. (2) 468. … G.S. 115-85; Venable v. School Committee, 149 N. C. 120 , 62 S. E. 902 ; School Commissioners v. Aldermen, supra; Board of Education v. Forrest, 190 N. C. 753 , 130 S. E. 621 ; Board of Education v. Pegram, 197 N.

State v. Hoffman

348 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 9, 1998

State v. Quick, 341 N.C. 141, 145 , 462 S.E.2d 186, 189 (1995). … The trial court thus did not err with regard to prospective juror Brown.

Newton v. School Committee of Charlotte

158 N.C. 186 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1912

Jeffress v. Greenville, 154 N. C., 499 ; Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners, 150 N. C., 116 ; Rosenthal v. Goldsboro, 149 N. C., 128 ; Ward v. Commissioners, 146 N. C., 534 ; Small v. Edenton, 146 N. … C., 527 ; Tate v. Greensboro, 114 N. C., 392 ; Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 .

Jarvis v. Vanderford

116 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1895

Tunstall v. Cobb, 109 N. C., 316 ; State v. Allen, Hawks, 6. This disposes of defendant’s first exception, and also of the second exception, so far as we can see. … Brown v. Brown, 106 N. C., 451 ; Davis v. Higgins, 91 N. C., 382 .

Bishop v. Glazener

245 N.C. 592 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1957

Brown v. Brown, 124 N.C. 19 , 32 S.E. 320 ; Johnston v. Johnston, 213 N.C. 255 , 195 S.E. 807 ; Monen v. Monen, 64 S.D. 581 , 269 N.W. 85 , 108 A.L.R. 404 ; Glatstein v. … Anno. 108 A.L.R., p. 413 et seq., where cases are cited from 27 states, including our case of Brown v. Brown. In Woodhouse v.

Dickens v. . Barnes

79 N.C. 490 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1878

In Capps v. Holt, 5 Jones, Eq., 153, the call was for “ a tract of 150 acres lying on watery branch in Johnson county; and that was held to be too vague. In Hinchey v. Nichols, 72 N. … In Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 , this Court held the description was susceptible of explanation, and was therefore sufficient.

Young v. AAA Realty Co. of Greensboro, Inc.

350 F. Supp. 1382 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 9, 1972

Brown v. Lo Duca, 307 F.Supp. 102 (E.D.Wis.1969); Johnson v. Decker, 333 F.Supp. 88 (N.D.Cal.1971); Crim v. Glover, 338 F.Supp. 823 (S.D.Ohio 1972). … Likewise, the Court finds Brown v. Ballas, supra, unpersuasive. The Brown case, as the instant case, involved alleged racial discrimination by a lessor against a prospective black lessee.

Sturm v. Schamens

99 N.C. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1990

See Flaherty v. Hunt, 82 N.C. App. 112 , 345 S.E.2d 426 , review denied, 318 N.C. 505 , 349 S.E.2d 859 (1986). … Brown proceeding. However, this claim is not supported by the record, nor is it sufficient to support a finding of waiver.

State v. Waycaster

824 S.E.2d 210 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2019

Detective Billie Brown ("Detective Brown") of the McDowell County Sheriff's Department was dispatched to a call of a possible stolen vehicle at Shelba's Diner. … After Detective Brown had arrived at the Diner, Defendant gave Detective Brown consent to search the vehicle, but advised that the vehicle belonged to Beam. Detective Brown then obtained permission to search from Beam.

Murdock v. Chatham County

198 N.C. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2009

Stat. § 153A-47 (2007); see also Jackson v. … Heery v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C. App. 612, 613 , 300 S.E.2d 869, 870 (1983).

Young v. Commissioners of Rowan County

194 N.C. 771 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1927

Yarious phases of special tax elections have been considered by tbis Court in tbe following cases: Howell v. Howell, 151 N. C., 575 ; Gill v. Comrs., 160 N. C., 176 ; Key v. Board of Education, 170 N. … C., 123 ; Wilson v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 638 ; Plott v. Comrs., 187 N. C., 127 ; Sparkman v. Comrs., 187 N. C., 244 ; Causey v. Guilford County, 192 N. C., 298 ; Flake v. Comrs., 192 N. C., 590 .