Case law

State v. Fleming

106 N.C. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1992

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). Defendant argues that the facts of this case are analogous to those in Brown v. Texas, supra. … We find that the facts in this case are analogous to those found in Brown .

Page Trust Co. v. Rose

192 N.C. 673 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1926

In Ward v. … In Cherry v.

Mize v. County of Mecklenburg

80 N.C. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1986

See also Board of Supervisors v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 225 Va. 235 , 302 S.E. 2d 19 (1983). But, in Town of Boothbay Harbor v. … Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of Comm’rs, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E. 2d 379, 383 (1980).

Four Seasons Management Services, Inc. v. Town of Wrightsville Beach

205 N.C. App. 65 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2010

As in [Convent v. Winston-Salem, 243 N.C. 316 , 90 S.E.2d 879 (1956), and Goforth Properties, Inc. v. Town of Chapel Hill, 71 N.C. … In addition, because “the function of a board of adjustment is to interpret local zoning ordinances[, s]ome deference is given to the board’s interpretation of its own city code.” Tucker v. Mecklenburg Cty.

Holland v. Buck Mountain Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc.

2020 NCBC 90 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 15, 2020

.”); Meiselman v. … Burgess v.

McCormick v. . Proctor

217 N.C. 23 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1940

In Paul v. … In Turner v.

Noland Co. v. . Trustees

190 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1925

Warner v. Halyburton , 187 N.C. 414 (public school building); Ingold v. Hickory , 178 N.C. 614 (public school building); Scheflow v. Pierce , 176 N.C. 91 (sewer system, town of Tarboro); Hutchinson v. … In Hutchinson v. Comrs. , 172 N.C. 844 , the Board of Commissioners of Iredell County, upon notice duly received, paid to a subcontractor (Lon G.

Curl v. AMERICAN MULTIMEDIA

665 S.E.2d 741 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 2008

665 S.E.2d 741 (2008) CURL, et al. v. AMERICAN MULTIMEDIA, et al. No. 21P08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 26, 2008. Guy W. Crabtree, Mark E. Fogel, Durham, for Earl Brown & Emma Brown. James F.

Kirby v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

368 N.C. 847 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 2016

App. at 436-39, 725 S.E.2d at 661-63), and that the “mere recording of project maps do[es] not constitute a taking” (citing, inter alia, Browning v. N.C. … See Town of Midland v. Wayne, 368 N.C. 55, 66, 773 S.E.2d 301, 309 (2015) (stating that “development rights” are “an important feature of the condemned land and not a separate, compensable property right”); Brown v.

Hallmark Clinic v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources

380 F. Supp. 1153 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 30, 1974

Woolfolk v. Brown, 358 F.Supp. 524, 537 (E.D.Va.1973) ; cf. Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178, 204-205 (2d Cir. 1971) (en banc). … McEnteggart v. Cataldo, 451 F.2d 1109, 1112 (1st Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 943 , 92 S.Ct. 2878 , 33 L.Ed.2d 767 (1972); Stolberg v. Members of the Board of Trustees, 474 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1973); Bell v.

Barbee v. Walton's Jewelers, Inc.

40 N.C. App. 760 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1979

See Hamm v. Texaco Inc., 17 N.C. App. 451 , 194 S.E. 2d 560 (1973), and Pergerson v. Williams, 9 N.C. … This Court held in Green v. Eure, Secretary of State, 18 N.C.

In re: R.S., A.S.

254 N.C. App. 678 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2017

Koufman v. Koufman, 330 N.C. 93, 97, 408 2 The trial court also adjudicated April and Chris neglected. However, Emily has withdrawn her appeal in this cause, and Mr. A. did not appeal. … Chambers, Sleight, and Brown.3 Among these findings are the following: 19.

Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North Carolina

85 N.C. App. 669 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1987

Nease, to Lawson Brown, an attorney representing plaintiffs employer, North Central Production Credit Association (NCPCA). A copy of Ms. Nease’s letter to Mr. … Brown concluded with the following paragraph: I have enclosed for your review a copy of the complaint that NCNB plans to file in this matter.

Taborn v. Hammonds

91 N.C. App. 302 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1988

Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). … Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. at 410 , 233 S.E. 2d at 541 .

Fix v. City of Eden

175 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2005

Barnhardt v. City of Kannapolis, 116 N.C. App. 215, 217 , 447 S.E.2d 471, 473 (1994). … Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 522 , 507 S.E.2d 894, 896 (1998). Our legislature, in enacting the current version of N.C. Gen.

North Carolina Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Leake

872 F. Supp. 2d 466 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 18, 2012

certain policy decisions of the Board of Elections (“BOE”). … Co. v. Brown, 651 F.2d 613 , 615 (9th Cir.1980)).

Lea v. Grier

156 N.C. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2003

Forrester v. Garrett, 280 N.C. 117, 122 , 184 S.E.2d 858, 861 (1971). B. … Taking the teachers’ allegations as true, “we conclude that the breach of contract claim as alleged in the complaint was sufficient to withstand [the Guilford County School Board’s] . . . motion to dismiss.” Brandis v.

Ramos v. Wal-Mart

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 27, 2009

Stat. § 97-25 ; Schofield v. Tea Co ., 299 N.C. 582 , 264 S.E.2d 56 (1980); Thompson v. Federal Express Ground , 175 N.C. App. 564 , 623 S.E.2d 811 (2006); Kanipe v. Lane Upholstery , 141 N.C. … Brown is not approved as reasonably necessary. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-25 ; Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 , 265 S.E.2d 389 (1980). 7.

State Ex Rel. Baker v. Hobgood

126 N.C. 149 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1900

This Court has since bald in Dalby v. Hancock, 125 N. C., 325 , that tbe “old Board” was the legal Board. It is settled in Norfleet v. Slaton, 73 N. C., 548 , and Jones v. Jones, 80 N. … In such case tbe appointee of tbe de facto Board,wbicb is subsequently adjudged to be the de jure Board, clearly has tbe title ho the office. Ledford v. Green, 125 N. C., 254 .

NORTHAMPTON CTY. DRAINAGE D. v. Bailey

326 N.C. 742 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1990

Wooten, Jr. and Browning, Sams, Poole, Hill & Hilburn by Robert R. Browning and P. Gwynett Hilburn, Greenville, for plaintiff appellee. Baker, Jenkins & Jones, P.A. by Ronald G. Baker, Ahoskie, for defendants. … We cannot hold that the decision as to how a governing board of a drainage district is chosen is a ministerial act.