Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

3.04s

  • Franklin County v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway

    80 Tenn. 521 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1883

    In Otis v. … Joseph v. Kansas City, St.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • WILLIAMS, ASHTON v. PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC.

    2026 TN WC 6 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 27, 2026

    Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(1) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … Young v. Young Elec. Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *16 (May 25, 2016).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tipton County Department of Public Instruction v. Delashmit Electric Company

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 7, 1998

    State v. Bilbrey, 878 S.W.2d 567, 571 (Tenn. App. 1994) (citing State v. Wilson, 194 Tenn. 140, 142-43, 250 S.W.2d 49, 50 (1952)). … Co., Inc. v. Board of Educ., 460 A.2d 609 (Md. App. 1983); D. Wilson Constr. Co., Inc. v. McAllen Independent Sch. Dist., 848 S.W.2d 226 (Tex. App. 1992).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Demotte, Julie v. UPS

    2018 TN WC 151 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 20, 2018

    Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *18 (Nov. 9, 2015); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2017). She has the burden of proof on all essential elements of her claim. Scott v. … Absent an appeal to the Appeals Board, this order shall become final in thirty days. 6.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Planters Bank of Tennessee

    56 Tenn. 455 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

    No other business being before the Board, on motion the Board adjourned.” … Puryear, Adm., v. McGavock et als., MS., * Nashville, 1871.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Jaquan Gathing and Prince Parker

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 19, 2018

    Brown also testified to a conversation she had with Mr. Parker while they were both incarcerated. Mr. Parker had hidden in the bathroom, unbeknownst to Ms. Brown. When Ms. Brown entered the bathroom, Mr. … State v. Pope, 427 S.W.3d 363, 369 (Tenn. 2013) (quoting State v. Hornsby, 858 S.W.2d 892, 897 (Tenn. 1993)). Here, Ms. Brown testified that Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • COX, BRIAN v. LOWE’S INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    2026 TN WC 51 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 21, 2026

    Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., 2018 Tenn. LEXIS 8, at *8 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Jan. 18, 2018). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carroll v. Whitney

    29 S.W.3d 14 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2000

    J.J.A.M.M., Inc., 258 N.J.Super. 399 , 609 A.2d 1299, 1303 (1992); Eberly v. A-P Controls, Inc., 61 Ohio St.3d 27 , 572 N.E.2d 633 , 638 n. 5 (1991); Brown v. … . § 4.22.070(1) (1999); Cline v. White, 183 W.Va. 43 , 393 S.E.2d 923, 925 (1990); Connor v. West Shore Equip, of Milwaukee, Inc., 68 Wis.2d 42, 227 N.W.2d 660, 662 (1975); Board of County Comm'rs v.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Stuart Bowden v. Memphis Bd. Ed.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 16, 1999

    Davis v. Reagan, 951 S.W.2d 766, 768 (Tenn. 1997); Westland West Community Ass’n v. Knox County, 948 S.W.2d 281, 283 (Tenn. 1997). … In Sanders v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Raines Brothers, Inc. v. H. Michael Chitwood

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 3, 2014

    Chitwood began transmitting letters to Matt Brown, Raines’s project manager, detailing various problems with the construction. Mr. Brown responded to Mr. Chitwood’s concerns and addressed the issues raised. … Brown. Eventually, a meeting was conducted in January 2010 with Mr. Chitwood, Mr. Brown, David Hammel (chief operating officer of Raines), and John Steele (Mr. Chitwood’s comptroller) in attendance. At this meeting, Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tracie Marie Shipwash v. Meadowood Apartments

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 31, 2004

    Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp., 919 S.W.2d 26, 35 (Tenn.1996); Presley v. Bennett, 860 S.W.2d 857, 859 (Tenn.1993). … Sloan v. Hall, 673 S.W.2d 548, 551 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frank H. McNiel v. Susan R. Cooper

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 2007

    The Board perfected this appeal. … The Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners (Board) is responsible for licensing and regulating all physicians in Tennessee.2 The Board receives administrative support from the Division of Health Related Boards (Division) in

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oak Ridge Hospital of the Methodist Church, Inc. v. City of Oak Ridge

    57 Tenn. App. 487 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 30, 1967

    Co. v. Cooper, 176 Tenn. 229 , 140 S.W.2d 411 ; City of Nashville v. State Board of Equalization, 210 Tenn. 587 , 360 S.W.2d 458 . … In support of this insistence, appellants rely on and cite T.C.A. 67-502 and the case of City of Nashville v. State Board of Equalization, 210 Tenn. 587 , 360 S.W.2d 458 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of All Assessments

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 20, 1999

    Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn. 1984) (citing CF Indus. v. Tennessee Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 599 S.W.2d 536, 540 (Tenn. 1980)). … Co. v. Clement, 57 Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Federal Deposit Insurance v. Tackett (In Re Tackett)

    67 B.R. 354 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 20, 1986

    Kaye v. Hirsch, 14 B.R. 59, 62 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1981). A debtor’s intent is not relevant where the objection to discharge is based on the failure to keep books and records. See Schultz v. … See Seidle v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hamm v. Hamm

    30 Tenn. App. 122 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 2, 1947

    In support of these views, we are referred to Swan v. Harrison, 42 Tenn. 534 , 545; Lingner v. Lingner, 165 Tenn. 525 , 56 S. W. (2d) 749 ; Brown v. Brown, 167 Tenn. 567 , 72 S. W. (2d) 557 . … R. 1293; Saul v. Saul, 74 App. D. C. 287, 122 F. (2d) 64. This is the view of the courts in this jurisdiction. Brown v. Brown, 155 Tenn. 530, 547 ; 296 S. W. 356 ; Toncray v. Toncray, 123 Tenn. 476, 485 , 131 S.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Shoup Voting MacHine, Corp. v. Hamilton County

    178 Tenn. 14 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1941

    It should be noted that in *18 so far as a'judicial officer is concerned, in Beaver v. Hall, 142 Tenn., 416 , 217 S. W., 649 , this conrt refused to apply the doctrine of Ruohs v. Athens and the authority of Ruohs v. … In that case, although two of a school board of three were ineligible to membership, nevertheless they were assuming, under color of right, with public acquiescence, to act as members of the board.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Melton v. Nolan

    161 Tenn. 293 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1930

    Marr v. Bank, 72 Tenn., 585 ; Shield v. Land Co., 94 Tenn., 148 . 5. … Edmondson v. The Board, 108 Tenn., 565 . 8. That it is violative of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States in that it provides for unreasonable search and seizure.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Grace Fellowhip Church v. Lenoir City Beer Bd. & KVAT Food Stores, Inc.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 15, 2001

    League Central Credit Union v. Mottern, 660 S.W.2d 787, 791 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). Also see: Bennett v. Sutts, 621 S.W.2d 575 (Tenn. 1975). … See Cagle v. Wheeler, 242 S.W.2d 338 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1951), Foust v. May, 660 S.W.2d 487 (Tenn. 1983); First Tenn. Bank Nat. Ass’n. V. Athletic Ind. Intern.,Inc., 1989 WL37261 (Tenn. Ct. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gilbert Olerud v. Dr. Walter M. Morgan, III

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 18, 2011

    Wilson v. Wilson, 987 S.W.2d 555, 562 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). … Alley v. State, 882 S.W.2d 810, 820 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.