Case law

Jernigan v. State

279 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1971

A similar result was reached in Koyce v. United States Board of Parole, 306 F. 2d 759 (D.C. … In Zerbst v.

Allen v. Sea Gate Ass'n, Inc.

119 N.C. App. 761 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1995

Green v. Duke Power Co., 305 N.C. 603, 608 , 290 S.E.2d 593, 596 (1982). … See Hawthorne v. Realty Syndicate, Inc., 43 N.C.

Brooks v. Rebarco, Inc.

91 N.C. App. 459 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1988

Brooks, Comr. of Labor v. … Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). The “whole record” test is also applied when the court considers whether an agency decision is arbitrary and capricious. High Rock Lake Assoc. v.

In Re the Appeal of Reeves Broadcasting Corp.

273 N.C. 571 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1968

Belks Department Store, Inc., v. Guilford County, supra. Abuse of discretion is not shown, and error of law prejudicial to the taxpayer does not appear. … In re Wallace, 267 N.C. 204 , 147 S.E. 2d 922 ; Vance v. Hampton, 256 N.C. 557 , 124 S.E. 2d 527 ; Hertford v. Harris, 263 N.C. 776 , 140 S.E. 2d 420 ; Lowe v. Jackson, 263 N.C. 634 , 140 S.E. 2d 1 .

Suiter v. . Brittle

90 N.C. 19 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Smith v. Lyon, 82 N. C., 2 ; Brown v. Williams, 83 *21 N. C., 684; Brown v. Williams, 84 N. C., 116 ; Wiley v. Lineberry, 88 N. C., 68 ; State v. O’Kelly, 88 N. C., 609 ; State v. Randall, 88 N. C., 611 .

Cook v. Union Zoning Bd. of Adjustment

185 N.C. App. 582 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 2007

"[A]ny person aggrieved" has standing to appeal the decision of a board of *466 adjustment pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 153A-345(b) (2003). See Lloyd v. … Heery v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C.App. 612 , 613, 300 S.E.2d 869 , 870 (1983) (internal citations and quotations omitted).

Newton v. School Committee of Charlotte

158 N.C. 186 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1912

Jeffress v. Greenville, 154 N. C., 499 ; Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners, 150 N. C., 116 ; Rosenthal v. Goldsboro, 149 N. C., 128 ; Ward v. Commissioners, 146 N. C., 534 ; Small v. Edenton, 146 N. … C., 527 ; Tate v. Greensboro, 114 N. C., 392 ; Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 .

Kirby v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

368 N.C. 847 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 2016

App. at 436-39, 725 S.E.2d at 661-63), and that the “mere recording of project maps do[es] not constitute a taking” (citing, inter alia, Browning v. N.C. … See Town of Midland v. Wayne, 368 N.C. 55, 66, 773 S.E.2d 301, 309 (2015) (stating that “development rights” are “an important feature of the condemned land and not a separate, compensable property right”); Brown v.

Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union County

317 N.C. 51 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1986

Durham County v. Addison, 262 N.C. 280 , 136 S.E. 2d 600 ; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 . … In Atkins v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Union County, 53 N.C.

Stancil v. Stancil

255 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1961

Holden v. Holden, supra; Stanley v. Stanley, 226 N.C. 129 , 37 S.E. 2d 118 ; Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556 , 31 S.E. 2d 529 ; Davis v. Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 . … Dyer v. Dyer, 212 N.C. 620 , 194 S.E. 278 ; Davis v. Davis, supra; Edmundson v. Edmundson, 222 N.C. 181 , 22 S.E. 2d 576 ; Smith v. Smith, 247 N.C. 223 , 100 S.E. 2d 370 . It will be noted in Davis v.

Murdock v. Chatham County

198 N.C. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2009

Stat. § 153A-47 (2007); see also Jackson v. … Heery v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C. App. 612, 613 , 300 S.E.2d 869, 870 (1983).

State v. Fleming

106 N.C. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1992

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). Defendant argues that the facts of this case are analogous to those in Brown v. Texas, supra. … We find that the facts in this case are analogous to those found in Brown .

Holland v. Buck Mountain Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc.

2020 NCBC 90 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 15, 2020

.”); Meiselman v. … Burgess v.

State v. Gordon

287 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1975

State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972). The constitutional right to a speedy trial prohibits arbitrary and oppressive delays by the prosecution. State v. Brown, supra; State v. … State v. Brown, supra; State v. George, 271 N.C. 488 , 156 S.E. 2d 845 (1967).

Crowe v. Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, Inc.

442 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 2, 1977

As a result the Council voted to set up a Board of Elections and to place this responsibility with such body. The Court will first consider the jurisdictional question. In Crowe v. … White Eagle v. One Feather, 478 F.2d 1311 (8th Cir. 1973); Daly v. United States, 483 F.2d 700 (8th Cir. 1973), and Brown v. United States, 486 F.2d 658 (8th Cir. 1973).

State Ex Rel. Cromartie v. Parker

121 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

Land Co. v. Beatty, 69 N. C., 329 ; Logan v. Wallis, 76 N. C., 416 ; Street v. Tuck, 84 N. C., 605 ; Doughty v. Railroad, 78 N. C., 22 ; Hodges v. Railroad, 105 N. C., 170 . … The action does not go to the power or authority of the Board to act in any way as a Board, but to the separate right of each individual defendant to remain a member of that Board.

Hallmark Clinic v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources

380 F. Supp. 1153 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 30, 1974

Woolfolk v. Brown, 358 F.Supp. 524, 537 (E.D.Va.1973) ; cf. Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178, 204-205 (2d Cir. 1971) (en banc). … McEnteggart v. Cataldo, 451 F.2d 1109, 1112 (1st Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 943 , 92 S.Ct. 2878 , 33 L.Ed.2d 767 (1972); Stolberg v. Members of the Board of Trustees, 474 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1973); Bell v.

Page Trust Co. v. Rose

192 N.C. 673 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1926

In Ward v. … In Cherry v.

Barbee v. Walton's Jewelers, Inc.

40 N.C. App. 760 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1979

See Hamm v. Texaco Inc., 17 N.C. App. 451 , 194 S.E. 2d 560 (1973), and Pergerson v. Williams, 9 N.C. … This Court held in Green v. Eure, Secretary of State, 18 N.C.

The Defiance

3 F.2d 48 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 1924

were otherwise and the evidence admissible, the mere opinion of one or the other of the parties that a maritime lion existed would not of itself create one, for as was said by the Supreme Court in Piedmont, etc., Coal Co. v. … The rule applicable under such circumstances is that announced by Judge Brown in The Vigilancia (D. C.) 58 F. 698 .