Case law

Bateman v. Glenn Ex Rel. Glenn

459 P.2d 854 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1969

In Cosmo Construction Company v. … Nobles v. Crockett, Okl., 319 P.2d 1007 .

Gilbert v. Welchel

162 Okla. 133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1933

Scott v. Woods Lumber Co., 86 Okla. 185 , 207 P. 449 . … Cohee v. Turner & Wiggins, 37 Okla. 778 , 132 P. 1082 .

Jones v. Featherston

373 P.2d 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1962

The rule in cases involving breach of warranty is set out in Stewart et al. v. … J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and DAVISON and IRWIN, JJ., dissent.

Ingram v. Chappell

127 Okla. 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1927

See Kellogg v. School Dist. No. 10, 13 Okla. 285 . 74 Pac. 110 . … J., MASON, V. O. J., and HARRISON, PHELPS, LESTER, HUNT, CLARK and RILEY, JJ., concur. Note. — See 37 Cyc. p.1199.

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2001

Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 , 668 (Okla. 1973) (quoting Boydston v. … Ethics Comm'n v. Keating, 958 P.2d 1250 , 1256 (Okla. 1998) (citing City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 459-60 (Okla. 1964)).

Isaac v. State

83 Okla. Crim. 33 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1946

Defendant cites and principally relies upon the case of Palmer v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 220 , 146 P.2d 592 , as authority for the reversal of this case. Also, the case of Johnson v. State, 59 Okla. … Cr. 283 , 58 P.2d 156 ; Mead v. State, 65 Okla. Cr. 86 , 83 P.2d 404 ; Miles v. State, 41 Okla. Cr. 283 , 273 P. 284 , and Moore v. State, 48 Okla. Cr. 106 , 289 P. 788 .

United States v. Roberson

108 F. Supp. 423 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1952

Estep v. United States, 1945, 327 U.S. 114 , ©6 S.Ct. 423, 90. L.Ed. 507. . … Imbodcn v. United States, 6 'Cir., 1952, 194 F.2d 508 ; Niznik v. United States, 6 Cir., 1949, 173 F.2d 328 , and Id., 6 Cir., 1950, 184 F.2d 972 ; United States v. Stiles, 3 Cir., 1948, 169 F.2d 455 ; United States v.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 2, 1991

ITS GOVERNING BOARD SHALL BE A BOARD OF EDUCATION CONSISTING OF NOT LESS THAN FIVE (5) NOR MORE THAN (7) MEMBERS ELECTED IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY THE STATE BOARD OF VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION. … OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION V. DAXON, 607 P.2D 683 (OKLA. 1980).

Opinion No. 75-197 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 1975

Our previous opinion answered your question in the negative and relied upon a recent opinion of the Florida Supreme Court in Canney v. … In State v.

Opinion No. 79-008 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1979

Inasmuch as members of a board of education customarily assume office by the electoral process, it is clear that none serve by con tract. The leading case defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, 64 Okl. … See also Farley v. Bd. of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917). It is clear under the foregoing authority that a member of a school board or board of education is an "officer."

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1988

HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY. 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985). … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. MOSS, 509 P.2D 666 (OKLA. 1973).

Stone v. State

80 Okla. Crim. 124 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1945

Robinson v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 667 , 130 P. 121 ; Oldham v. State, 43 Okla. Cr. 108 , 277 P. 254 ; Rhodes v. State, 30 Okla. Cr. 2 , 234 P. 645 ; Hunter v. State, 63 Okla. Cr. 24 , 72 P. 2d 399 . In Allen v. … Wilson v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 714 , 109 P. 289 ; Holmes v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 541 , 119 P. 430 , 120 P. 300 ; Jolliffee v. State, 21 Okla. Cr. 278 , 207 P. 454 ; MeOullom v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 46 , 209 P. 781 ; Gray v.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 7, 2003

."); State v. … Wimberly v.

NexStar Media Inc v. Walters

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 11, 2024

Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33, 41 (1989) (emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Manning v. … United States v. New Mexico, 642 F.2d 397, 400 (10th Cir. 1981).

Pennsylvania Co. v. Potter

108 Okla. 49 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1923

. & Loan, 61 Okla. 230 , 157 Pac. 366 ; McKee v. Howard, 38 Okla. 422 , 134 Pac. 44 ; McAdams v. Latham, 21 Okla. 511 , 96 Pac. 584 ; Jenkins v. Brown, 46 Okla. 132 , 148 Pac. 697 . … In the case of Chivers v. Board of Com’rs of Johnston Co., 62 Okla. 2 , 161 Pac. 822 , this court distinguished that case from the case of Town of Byars v.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1991

DIERKS V. WALSH, 218 P.2D 920 (OKLA. 1950). … AND/OR POSSIBLE BOARD ACTION.

Simpson v. White

195 Okla. 375 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1945

Further, that when plaintiff’s foot slipped through the board, one of the defendants’ employees said that the board should have been fixed; that the board looked like it might have been rotten. … Co. v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Dickey

113 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925

In the case of Oklahoma News Co. v. … Iln the case of Payne v.

Powell v. State Industrial Commission

208 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1953

The board, referring to the board claimant said struck his feet, had blown around and claimant was standing “kind of” on the board. This board was placed over a depression underneath the press. William W. … Johnson v. Ben Franklin Ref. Co., 194 Okla. 347 , 151 P. 2d 428 ; Banning v. Peru-Laclede Syn., 179 Okla. 382 , 65 P. 2d 976 ; Hollis v. Mid-Continent Pet. Corp., 174 Okla. 544 , 51 P. 2d 498 ; Souder v.

Roselle v. State

509 P.2d 486 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1973

C-71-524, Appellant, Joe Ro-selle, was convicted for the offense of Contempt in a Summary Proceedings on the 20th day of September, 1971, before District Court Judge Elvin Brown. … In the cases of Re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 , 68 S.Ct. 499 , 92 L.Ed. 682 (1947) and Mayberry v.