Case law

Ingram v. Chappell

127 Okla. 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1927

See Kellogg v. School Dist. No. 10, 13 Okla. 285 . 74 Pac. 110 . … J., MASON, V. O. J., and HARRISON, PHELPS, LESTER, HUNT, CLARK and RILEY, JJ., concur. Note. — See 37 Cyc. p.1199.

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2001

Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 , 668 (Okla. 1973) (quoting Boydston v. … Ethics Comm'n v. Keating, 958 P.2d 1250 , 1256 (Okla. 1998) (citing City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 459-60 (Okla. 1964)).

Balthrop v. Clark

94 Okla. 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1924

Brown, Guardian, surpa, quoting with approval from the case of Apple et al. v. … Brown, supra, which furnishes the correct rule for our guidance in this case. In the Cole v.

Isaac v. State

83 Okla. Crim. 33 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1946

Defendant cites and principally relies upon the case of Palmer v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 220 , 146 P.2d 592 , as authority for the reversal of this case. Also, the case of Johnson v. State, 59 Okla. … Cr. 283 , 58 P.2d 156 ; Mead v. State, 65 Okla. Cr. 86 , 83 P.2d 404 ; Miles v. State, 41 Okla. Cr. 283 , 273 P. 284 , and Moore v. State, 48 Okla. Cr. 106 , 289 P. 788 .

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 2, 1991

ITS GOVERNING BOARD SHALL BE A BOARD OF EDUCATION CONSISTING OF NOT LESS THAN FIVE (5) NOR MORE THAN (7) MEMBERS ELECTED IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY THE STATE BOARD OF VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION. … OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION V. DAXON, 607 P.2D 683 (OKLA. 1980).

Jones v. Featherston

373 P.2d 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1962

The rule in cases involving breach of warranty is set out in Stewart et al. v. … J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and DAVISON and IRWIN, JJ., dissent.

Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. O'Donnell

64 Okla. 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1917

Co. v. Castleberry, 40 Okla. 613 , 139 Pac. 837 ; C., R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Townes, 43 Okla. 568 , 143 Pac. 681 ; Producers’ Oil Co. v. Eaton, 44 Okla. 55 , 143 Pac. 9 ; Rock Island Milling Co. v. … Co. v.

Opinion No. 79-008 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1979

Inasmuch as members of a board of education customarily assume office by the electoral process, it is clear that none serve by con tract. The leading case defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, 64 Okl. … See also Farley v. Bd. of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917). It is clear under the foregoing authority that a member of a school board or board of education is an "officer."

State Bar v. Retail Credit Ass'n

170 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1934

In Board v. … In Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v.

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 10, 1999

Midwest City v. … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).

Stone v. State

80 Okla. Crim. 124 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1945

Robinson v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 667 , 130 P. 121 ; Oldham v. State, 43 Okla. Cr. 108 , 277 P. 254 ; Rhodes v. State, 30 Okla. Cr. 2 , 234 P. 645 ; Hunter v. State, 63 Okla. Cr. 24 , 72 P. 2d 399 . In Allen v. … Wilson v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 714 , 109 P. 289 ; Holmes v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 541 , 119 P. 430 , 120 P. 300 ; Jolliffee v. State, 21 Okla. Cr. 278 , 207 P. 454 ; MeOullom v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 46 , 209 P. 781 ; Gray v.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1979

Inasmuch as members of a board of education customarily assume office by the electoral process, it is clear that none serve by con tract. The leading case defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, 64 Okla. … See also Farley v. Bd. of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okla. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917). It is clear under the foregoing authority that a member of a school board or board of education is an "officer."

Bentley v. Zelma Oil Co.

76 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1919

by the board of directors May 9, 1914, expressly prohibiting the making of any drilling contracts, except by a majority of the board; it was made without the knowledge or consent of, or any authority from, the board of dü … S.] 472; Eldred v. Okmulgee Loan & Trust Co., 22 Okla. 742 , 98 Pac. 929 ; Allen v. Brown, 6 Kan.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 7, 2003

."); State v. … Wimberly v.

NexStar Media Inc v. Walters

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 11, 2024

Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33, 41 (1989) (emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Manning v. … United States v. New Mexico, 642 F.2d 397, 400 (10th Cir. 1981).

Pennsylvania Co. v. Potter

108 Okla. 49 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1923

. & Loan, 61 Okla. 230 , 157 Pac. 366 ; McKee v. Howard, 38 Okla. 422 , 134 Pac. 44 ; McAdams v. Latham, 21 Okla. 511 , 96 Pac. 584 ; Jenkins v. Brown, 46 Okla. 132 , 148 Pac. 697 . … In the case of Chivers v. Board of Com’rs of Johnston Co., 62 Okla. 2 , 161 Pac. 822 , this court distinguished that case from the case of Town of Byars v.

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1999

Oklahoma Journal Publishing Company v. Oklahoma City, 620 P.2d 452 , 454 (Okl.Ct.App. 1980). … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P. 2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Dickey

113 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925

In the case of Oklahoma News Co. v. … Iln the case of Payne v.

Calkin v. Wolcott

182 Okla. 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1937

In Brown v. … Brown v. Trent, supra; Driskell v. Quinn, supra.

Opinion No. 92-558 (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1992

AND, AS DISCUSSED IN RELATION TO 162 AND 452, THE BOARD IS A "PRINCIPAL OFFICER" WITHIN THE MEANING OF 19 O.S. 180 .65, SEE, ADAIR COUNTY EXCISE BOARD V. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, SUPRA. … IN STATE V.